Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Page | Talk:0.999... (Log · Page History) |
| User | Loadmaster (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 62 |
| Minor edits | 5 (8.1%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 0 (0%) |
| Reverted edits | 0 (0%) |
| atbe1 | 64.7 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 22,678 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -12,218 |
Minor edits
·
5 (8.1%)
Major edits
·
57 (91.9%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
0 (0%)
Manual edits
·
62 (100%)
Reverted edits
·
0 (0%)
Unreverted edits
·
62 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-10-19 21:27 | Diff · History | 406 | →Origins of recurring decimals: Muddy waters |
| 2017-10-18 20:35 | Diff · History | 100 | →Origins of recurring decimals: add |
| 2017-10-18 20:32 | Diff · History | 509 | →Origins of recurring decimals: Recurring decimal is in fact a representation of an rational number |
| 2017-02-14 18:31 | Diff · History | 169 | →Induction proofs and 0.999.....: addendum |
| 2017-02-14 18:28 | Diff · History | 665 | →Induction proofs and 0.999.....: Probably not useful as an instructive argument |
| 2016-02-11 18:12 | Diff · History | 33 | →Simple Explanation for a Pedestrian Mind?: more |
| 2016-02-11 18:10 | Diff · History | 1,113 | →Simple Explanation for a Pedestrian Mind?: Another take on this |
| 2014-07-10 22:20 | Diff · History | 504 | →Cauchy sequences: new section |
| 2014-01-06 22:01 | Diff · History | 199 | →Is 0.999... a rational number?: 0.999... is a repeating decimal |
| 2013-12-06 17:13 | Diff · History | 601 | →Repeating decimal: More specifically, another justification for the equality |
| 2013-12-06 17:04 | Diff · History | 14 | →Notice: mv new sect to bottom |
| 2013-12-04 19:27 | Diff · History | 703 | →Repeating decimal: new section |
| 2013-11-08 19:27 | Diff · History | 353 | →0.999... = 1 is just a trivial truth about the convergence of a sequence: Already covered in the article |
| 2013-10-30 02:34 | Diff · History | 455 | →Question (by an amateur): (0.999...)...(0.999...) = 1 |
| 2013-10-17 16:28 | Diff · History | 399 | →Merge with 1 (number): "0.999..." is a perfect title |
| 2013-10-10 18:10 | Diff · History | 303 | →.999... = 1/1 by long division: Same argument given a few years ago |
| 2013-10-03 18:26 | Diff · History | 311 | →1 - (.99999...)^2 = x: Somewhat interesting, 0.999...^2 = 0.999... |
| 2013-08-15 18:11 | Diff · History | 336 | →Adding clarification in the beginning on the nature of the "proof" of .999... = 1: 0.999... is not a a sequence |
| 2013-05-04 18:28 | Diff · History | 157 | →Another example: I.e., avoid subtraction examples |
| 2013-04-15 16:58 | Diff · History | 495 | →Another example: True in theory, not in practice |
| 2013-03-25 20:22 | Diff · History | 657 | →Another example: new section |
| 2013-03-25 20:03 | Diff · History | 553 | →Article title: Against rename |
| 2013-02-12 01:17 | Diff · History | 1 | →Misrepresentation of the hyperreals: |
| 2013-02-12 01:16 | Diff · History | 687 | →Misrepresentation of the hyperreals: Is Katz's notation different than the standard? |
| 2013-02-07 19:15 | Diff · History | 407 | →Time to remove this article from Wikipedia: Not worth quoting |
| 2013-02-07 19:01 | Diff · History | 18 | Added missing sect title |
| 2013-02-07 18:56 | Diff · History | 1 | →Time to remove this article from Wikipedia: Added missing indents |
| 2013-01-28 21:05 | Diff · History | 235 | →Isn't this article assuming that the decimal system is absolute?: 0.222... (base 3) = 1 |
| 2013-01-28 21:02 | Diff · History | 22 | mv new sect to end of page |
| 2013-01-23 18:59 | Diff · History | 647 | →"Simple visual verification": How about an image showing 9/10+9/100+9/1000+... = 1? |
| 2012-08-16 00:34 | Diff · History | 226 | →SILLY redirects: 0.99 redirect to 99%? |
| 2012-08-12 18:55 | Diff · History | 412 | →SILLY redirects: 0.9999... et al redirects |
| 2012-01-23 23:30 | Diff · History | 355 | →Cannot be written as stated.: recurring digits vs. infinite number of digits |
| 2011-07-13 19:47 | Diff · History | 92 | →Image for 0.999...: cf. image File:PI.svg for pi |
| 2011-07-11 19:05 | Diff · History | 412 | →How many nines in a repeating decimal?: it's proably an commonly accepted notational convention |
| 2011-07-11 19:00 | Diff · History | 161 | →Image for 0.999...: keep |
| 2011-07-05 17:37 | Diff · History | 370 | →Image for 0.999...: new section |
| 2011-04-27 17:46 | Diff · History | 522 | →Nonzero or non-zero: not clear which way is better |
| 2010-10-17 17:27 | Diff · History | 149 | →It's a falacy: but it's not a fallacy |
| 2010-02-26 05:31 | Diff · History | 355 | →An obvious explanation for the confusion: Does 0.999... represent something other than a real number? |
| 2010-02-25 03:48 | Diff · History | 337 | →An obvious explanation for the confusion: but not for the reals |
| 2010-02-23 22:02 | Diff · History | 11 | →An obvious explanation for the confusion: clarify |
| 2010-02-23 21:59 | Diff · History | 802 | →An obvious explanation for the confusion: mathematical reasoning, not popularity |
| 2010-02-20 19:51 | Diff · History | 506 | →An obvious explanation for the confusion: distinct digit sequences and equality |
| 2010-02-20 05:09 | Diff · History | 424 | →An obvious explanation for the confusion: unless multiple mappings exist |
| 2009-12-02 23:50 | Diff · History | 312 | →first paragraph should: monkeys can |
| 2009-11-07 02:09 | Diff · History | 467 | →Sources: see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (mathematics) |
| 2009-07-27 20:13 | Diff · History | 12 | added missing sect title |
| 2009-07-01 18:53 | Diff · History | 335 | →Image in lede: Intro image Image:999 Perspective.svg is very appropriate |
| 2009-05-22 14:20 | Diff · History | -12,002 | →The Cyclical Paradox of the First Proof: moved discussion to Talk:0.999.../Arguments as per page heading instructions |
| 2009-05-19 16:28 | Diff · History | 315 | →Wow: and sci.math ng |
| 2009-03-30 18:31 | Diff · History | 255 | →Proposed new opening.: limits, I like |
| 2009-03-27 14:48 | Diff · History | 580 | →Proposed new opening.: fundamental reason |
| 2009-02-14 02:24 | Diff · History | 1,577 | →Another long division: Not designed to convince anyone, designed to show mathematical consistency |
| 2009-02-14 01:54 | Diff · History | -216 | →Another long division: on second thought, maybe it doesn't |
| 2009-02-14 01:52 | Diff · History | 215 | →Another long division: related to continued fractions? |
| 2009-02-13 16:07 | Diff · History | 719 | →Another long division: new section |
| 2006-11-02 22:47 | Diff · History | 633 | →How can it be a real number and a hyperreal?: is too a hyperreal |
| 2006-11-02 00:02 | Diff · History | 201 | →Proofs need to be reexamined: length of [0,1) |
| 2006-11-01 23:58 | Diff · History | 92 | →How can it be a real number and a hyperreal?: more |
| 2006-11-01 23:53 | Diff · History | 522 | →How can it be a real number and a hyperreal?: hyperreals are not relevant |
| 2006-10-26 23:28 | Diff · History | 256 | →image: |
All times are in UTC.