Back Biosthmors • Talk:Circumcision • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Page Talk:Circumcision (Log · Page History)
User Biosthmors (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 63
Minor edits 4 (6.3%)
(Semi-)automated edits 0 (0%)
Reverted edits 0 (0%)
atbe1 4.3
Added (bytes)2 17,363
Deleted (bytes) -103
Minor edits · 4 (6.3%)
Major edits · 59 (93.7%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 0 (0%)
Manual edits · 63 (100%)
Reverted edits · 0 (0%)
Unreverted edits · 63 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
2013-06-03 23:51 Diff · History 444 →Good work: new section
2013-02-26 21:29 Diff · History 290 →Babies circumcision paraphernalia, and other objects related to the american culture of neonatal circumcisions: re
2013-02-25 21:13 Diff · History 181 →missing sections from this Circumcision article rendering it substandard for "good article" status recently awarded: re
2013-02-25 21:09 Diff · History 228 →missing sections from this Circumcision article rendering it substandard for "good article" status recently awarded: re
2013-02-25 01:55 Diff · History 168 →Claims: re
2013-02-25 01:54 Diff · History 233 →Men rights: re
2013-02-16 20:08 Diff · History 402 →MO of circumcision advocates here: re
2013-02-16 20:04 Diff · History 205 →Editing with an agenda: re
2013-02-13 01:25 Diff · History 235 →Potential source: re
2013-02-13 01:10 Diff · History 1 →Potential source: ce
2013-02-13 01:10 Diff · History -69 →Potential source: ce
2013-02-13 01:09 Diff · History 640 →Potential source: re
2013-02-13 00:51 Diff · History 403 →Potential source: re
2013-02-12 21:40 Diff · History -4 →Neutrality and GA status disputed: ce
2013-02-12 21:38 Diff · History 281 →Neutrality and GA status disputed: re
2013-02-12 21:30 Diff · History 256 →Potential source: re
2013-02-12 21:27 Diff · History 407 →Neutrality and GA status disputed: re
2013-02-12 21:12 Diff · History -24 →Potential source: re
2013-02-12 21:10 Diff · History 207 →Potential source: new section
2013-02-11 18:53 Diff · History 134 →Where are we on length?: re
2013-02-11 18:30 Diff · History 93 →Where are we on length?:
2013-02-11 18:29 Diff · History 103 →Where are we on length?: new section
2013-02-11 18:25 Diff · History 161 →Edits from 11 Feb 2013: re
2013-02-11 17:59 Diff · History -6 →References number 34 and 56 seem to link to the same page:
2013-02-11 17:59 Diff · History 148 →References number 34 and 56 seem to link to the same page: re
2013-02-11 17:57 Diff · History 520 →WHO global Trends and Determinants 2007 pdf: re
2013-02-11 17:54 Diff · History 417 →Edits from 11 Feb 2013: re
2013-02-10 20:35 Diff · History 163 →Circumcision as a major cause of meatal stenosis: re
2013-02-10 18:49 Diff · History 205 →Circumcision as a major cause of meatal stenosis: re
2013-02-09 23:31 Diff · History 197 →Masturbation more difficult in circumcised men: re
2013-02-09 23:30 Diff · History 648 →Masturbation more difficult in circumcised men: re
2013-02-06 18:22 Diff · History 225 →blanket reversion of 5 edits with no discussion and bizarre assertion of including unsourced material: re
2013-02-06 18:19 Diff · History 179 →Circumcision as a major cause of meatal stenosis: re
2013-02-06 18:15 Diff · History 315 →Edit request on 6 February 2013: re
2013-02-02 22:30 Diff · History 677 →Neutrality of this article seems to have vanished: re
2013-02-02 22:19 Diff · History 313 →Circumcision as a major cause of meatal stenosis: re
2013-01-17 06:09 Diff · History 12 →Sexual effects of circumcision: re
2013-01-17 06:09 Diff · History 0 →Sexual effects of circumcision:
2013-01-17 06:08 Diff · History 608 →Sexual effects of circumcision: re
2012-12-31 03:21 Diff · History 106 →On this article: re
2012-12-30 21:55 Diff · History 204 →On this article: re
2012-12-30 21:22 Diff · History 129 →On this article: re
2012-12-30 21:19 Diff · History 383 →On this article: re
2012-12-29 00:34 Diff · History 309 →Adult Circumcision for cosmetic or aesthetic reasons -is this considered in the literature and should it get mention in the article ?: re
2012-12-28 23:11 Diff · History 226 →gender reassignment due to botched circumcision -paragraph from "genital mutilitation" article - should this get mention in "Circumcision"?: another thought...
2012-12-28 23:09 Diff · History 629 /* gender reassignment due to botched circumcision -paragraph from "genital mutilitation" article - should this get mention in "Circumcision"? / re
2012-12-28 23:02 Diff · History 938 →Ethical and legal issues /non physician circumcisions/ parallels with FGM ?: re
2012-12-28 03:51 Diff · History 183 →Ethical and legal issues /non physician circumcisions/ parallels with FGM ?: re
2012-12-27 20:03 Diff · History 320 →Ethical and legal issues /non physician circumcisions/ parallels with FGM ?: re
2012-09-20 15:37 Diff · History 217 →Medical aspects: thanks again
2012-09-19 18:39 Diff · History 251 →Medical aspects: new section
2012-09-17 00:22 Diff · History 11 →POV?: reword
2012-09-17 00:17 Diff · History 524 →POV?: reply
2012-09-16 16:41 Diff · History 0 →POV?:
2012-09-16 16:40 Diff · History 1 →POV?:
2012-09-16 16:39 Diff · History 1,134 →POV?: replies
2012-09-14 17:53 Diff · History 137 →POV?: reply
2012-09-14 17:47 Diff · History 244 →POV?: new section
2012-09-07 04:14 Diff · History 721 →Primary sources vs. secondary sources: new section
2012-09-06 21:31 Diff · History 116 →Outdated statements: reply
2012-09-06 19:11 Diff · History 316 →Outdated statements: reply
2012-09-05 19:34 Diff · History 249 →Outdated statements: new section
2012-09-05 18:33 Diff · History 316 →Possible content: new section
All times are in UTC.