Talk:Q21510851
Add topicAutodescription — allowed qualifiers constraint (Q21510851)
Useful links:
View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
Report on constraint conformation of “allowed qualifiers constraint” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
allowed qualifiers constraint⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) — on Wikidata Graph Builder ; depth= [1 - 2 - 3 - 5 - 10 ] - Generic queries for classes
See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
Always allowed qualifiers?
[edit]There are certain qualifiers, namely sourcing circumstances (P1480) and nature of statement (P5102), that ought to be allowed on all statements, regardless of the presence of this constraint. Is there 1) a technical means of achieving that, and 2) support for implementing that? Swpb (talk) 18:55, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
- I agree, but more specifically with reason for deprecated rank (P2241) and reason for preferred rank (P7452) RPI2026F1 (talk) 22:59, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Prohibited qualifier?
[edit]Can we have something like "prohibited qualifiers constraint"? While editing NDL Authority ID (P349), I want to specify replacement property (P6824) for some dis-allowed qualifiers. Or is it possible? fryed-peach (talk) 15:55, 6 April 2024 (UTC)