Skip to main content
Print subscriptions
Sign in
My account
Account overview
Billing
Profile
Emails & marketing
Data privacy
Settings
Help
Comments & replies
Sign out
Search jobs
Search
switch to the
US edition
switch to the
UK edition
switch to the
Australia edition
switch to the
International edition
switch to the
Europe edition
current edition:
US edition
The Guardian - Back to home
News
US news
US politics
World news
Climate crisis
Middle East
Ukraine
US immigration
Soccer
Business
Environment
Tech
Science
Newsletters
Wellness
Opinion
The Guardian view
Columnists
Letters
Opinion videos
Cartoons
Sport
Soccer
NFL
Tennis
MLB
MLS
NBA
WNBA
NHL
F1
Golf
Culture
Film
Books
Music
Art & design
TV & radio
Stage
Classical
Games
Lifestyle
The Filter
Wellness
Fashion
Food
Recipes
Love & sex
Home & garden
Health & fitness
Family
Travel
Money
What term do you want to search?
Search with google
Support us
Print subscriptions
US edition
switch to the
UK edition
switch to the
Australia edition
switch to the
International edition
switch to the
Europe edition
Search jobs
Digital Archive
Guardian Licensing
Live events
About Us
The Guardian app
Video
Podcasts
Pictures
Inside the Guardian
Guardian Weekly
Crosswords
Wordiply
Corrections
Tips
Facebook
Twitter
Search jobs
Digital Archive
Guardian Licensing
Live events
About Us
News
Opinion
Sport
Culture
Lifestyle
Show
More
Soccer
NFL
Tennis
MLB
MLS
NBA
WNBA
NHL
F1
Golf
More
The question
Wednesday
1
October
2014
The Question: is the counter-counter more crucial than the counterattack?
Jonathan Wilson:
The ability to stop counterattacks separates Europe’s best teams from the rest. Manchester City’s failure to stop their opponents breaking forward is costing them dearly
The Question: is the counter-counter more crucial than the counterattack?
Older
Newer
Topics
Roma
Uefa
Champions League
Manchester City
Close
The Question: is the counter-counter more crucial than the counterattack?