Paul Ingrassia

As America stands at a pivotal juncture, discover how the new Department of Justice aims to restore the rule of law and rebuild public trust in our legal system.

Explore how the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division is shifting from progressive ideals to a more balanced approach, addressing years of perceived judicial overreach and its implications for justice.

As President Trump prepares to take office, his vision for the Department of Justice promises a dramatic shift towards restoring the rule of law. Discover the bold changes he plans to implement.

As the H-1B visa debate heats up, discover the critical insights that Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy may be overlooking. Read on for a deeper understanding.

As mass deportations loom on the horizon, the implications for America’s immigration policy and national identity are more pressing than ever. Explore the critical challenges ahead.

Explore the complex intersection of law and justice in the Eastman case, as we unravel the implications of legal tactics in the pursuit of accountability.

Juan Merchan’s recent court order challenges the very foundations of due process and presidential immunity, raising critical questions about the integrity of New York’s legal system. Discover the implications of this controversial ruling.

Explore how Donald Trump’s transformative influence is reshaping America’s political landscape and what it means for the future of global politics in this insightful analysis.

Donald Trump’s recent recognition as Time Magazine’s “Person of the Year” marks a pivotal moment in American history. Discover how his remarkable comeback and transformative presidency are reshaping the nation’s political landscape and cultural discourse. Read more to explore the implications of this milestone.

As Donald Trump reemerges on the global stage, his recent visit to Paris symbolizes a renewed hope for Europe, grappling with crises of identity and strength. Explore how his leadership offers a path toward stability and independence for the West.

America, since its inception, has been a place of opportunity for aspiring, high-skilled people.

The Constitution of the United States is the law of the land.

And some reflections on justice.

On November 5th, the American people gave Donald Trump one of the most resounding and consequential political mandates in generations.

On this Thanksgiving, Americans have so many blessings to count.  It was a little over four months ago that several gunshots were fired at the next President of the United States.

President Trump can undo much of the damage from the Biden regime’s nightmarish last four years shortly after he takes the Oath on January 20th.

Donald Trump’s presidential transition currently underway has by all accounts been a smooth and seamless process.

Mapping out an agenda for restoring faith in the justice system while also holding those who have weaponized the law against Donald Trump and his supporters over the last four years accountable.

President Trump is already making history with his cabinet – a motley list of government reformers, from Tom Homan (Border Czar) to Tulsi bard (DNI) to Matt Gaetz (AG) to Pete Hegseth (Defense Secretary) to Robert F.

Donald Trump’s resounding victory over Kamala Harris was historically consequential: it was the first time a Republican presidential candidate carried both the electoral college and popular vote in twenty years.

It’s been a little over a week since Donald Trump’s landslide victory over Kamala Harris – and the deep state she represents – marking the historic culmination of a roaring political comeback by the soon to be 47th President.  Donald Trump’s victory was significant for myriad reasons: in the electoral college, it was the most consequential performance by a Republican presidential candidate since 1988.  Donald Trump also won the popular vote – by an order of magnitude greater than any Republican candidate, including his previous two bids in 2016 and 2020, ever.  As it stands, President Trump is on track to generate almost 80 million votes – a feat made even more remarkable by the unprecedented conditions under which it took place.

No election in American history has pitted such diametrically opposed visions against one another as does the 2024 race.  Simply put, this is a contest to preserve America as we know it against the creeping tide of tyranny and barbarism, which threatens to destroy everything we purportedly cherish as a nation: This runs the gamut from our right to speak freely to the expectation of a free and impartial justice system, which treats everyone – regardless of political persuasion – equally under the law.  Beyond the loftier issues of this race are the lower ordered expectations necessary to the bare minimums of nationhood: borders, fair elections, opposite gendered bathrooms and locker rooms.   The radical Left-wing ideology of wokeism, which has been internalized by the Democratic Party – and embodied in its chosen candidate, is the antithesis of virtually everything the Founding Fathers envisaged for the United States of America.  Kamala

Mike Crispi and his team spearheads historic early vote turnout for Donald Trump in New Jersey.

In less than one week’s time, Donald Trump will be officially elected as the nation’s forty-seventh president, a most remarkable political feat – the light at the end of the tunnel following four harrowing, tragic years that were among the darkest in living memory for this country.

An Update On What Polls And Prediction Markets Are Saying About The Seven Key Swing States This Election Season – WI, MI, PA, NC, GA, AZ, and NV.

Donald Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign is in a far better position now – far better, based on the polling and a survey of all the available evidence — than in his previous two victorious presidential runs.

America has the potential to become an industrial behemoth.  That it has not already with a quarter of the twenty-first century now in the rearview mirror is an absolute travesty.

Donald Trump long ago coined a term that so perfectly describes the disastrous results of Kamala’s past week of politicking: Choke Artist.  If there was ever a perfect encapsulation of what that term means in real time, it would be the series of unfortunate events that has now precipitated a nightmare scenario for the Kamala campaign.

The following content is sponsored by Birch Gold.

Kamala Harris and Tim Walz have made a penchant for chastising “hate speech” and “misinformation” on the campaign trail this election season.  While those words might not seem like much to those less familiar with how our constitutional form of government, and specifically the First Amendment, is supposed to work, they are offensive to those of us who understand a thing or two about the Constitution – particularly, the notable omission of a so-called “hate speech” clause.

From Demosthenes to Donald: How President Trump’s Rhetorical Innovation Places Him In Good Company Among Great Western Orators Americans already have a good sense that Donald Trump is a maestro of political rhetoric.  When he burst onto the national stage in 2016, it was in large part owing to a salesmanesque rhetoric, which made it easy to communicate often complex problems and ideas, from the fledgling border crisis to the stupidity of our ruling class, to mass audiences in sound bites that were as informative as they were entertaining.   But that does not capture the entire picture of how Donald Trump has revolutionized political rhetoric, or the way we talk about political things, and how his mastery of oratory has evolved over the years to incorporate new innovations previously unseen in our national lexicon.

It is a sad, borderline tragic commentary on modern American life that fewer and fewer of our countrymen would recognize Thomas Jefferson’s foreboding words that offer a solemn coda to our Declaration of Independence: “We mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.” Today, such famous canonical phrases (even among the educated professions) of America’s legal pantheon go often unrecognized with scandalous and increasing regularity.

The tides have shifted in MAGA world – and those reverberations are being felt not only in politics, but across all of American society.

Jack Smith’s redacted presidential immunity motion is a complete nothing burger.

Anyone who enters politics for no other reason than to obtain power should be the last one granted it, for these types throughout history always become the most dangerous.

The visceral scenes this past weekend out of Asheville, North Carolina, a town ravaged by Hurricane Hellene, coupled with a report by ICE, the federal government agency tasked with tracking illegal migration, that over 435,000 convicted criminals – a staggering figure that includes 13,000 murderers – have infiltrated our country under the Biden-Harris administration, cut a portrait of mind-numbing, civilization-ending incompetence, that should frankly scandalize and embarrass every single red-blooded American, for the sheer magnitude of the depravity, one that has no precedent in our history.

We are now within the 40-day window until Election Day – and all eyes are on the Keystone state.  Over the next couple of weeks, both President Trump and Senator JD Vance have multiple rallies scheduled in Pennsylvania, including one in Butler County scheduled for October 5th.

Because there is a great deal of uncertainty with any election, a good rule of thumb in presidential politics, especially in the era of rampant cheating and electoral fraud, is to control what you can and do not give the enemy any unforced errors.  A case in point: Nebraska, a state with five electoral votes.  Nebraska is only one of two states in the union (the other being Maine) where its electoral votes are not allocated on a winner take all basis.  This quirk has been Nebraska’s law since 1992, where the state legislature voted to implement a by-district allocation system.  In practical terms, what this means is the region that includes Democrat-leaning Omaha will occasionally break from the remaining four electors, which have always voted Republican since the law’s enactment some thirty years ago.   Although not always the case, Barack Obama carried the one electoral vote encompassing the Omaha

By Paul Ingrassia and Ed Martin Over the past four years, Catholic Americans have been targeted by name: by the FBI in the Richmond memo is the most famous.  And Catholic Americans have been hunted by the DOJ.  They have been targeted by the fake news media hitting them with quotes by the Pope.  More than ever, a national election will decide the fate of Catholic Americans.  Catholic Americans must choose to save themselves and our nation.

The 45th President is riding the momentum of a historic two-week stretch, which has observed a number of extraordinary moments in a campaign that has already been replete with so many of them.  This started with a rousing debate performance that captured the national media’s attention in a way that only the master showman could.  To this day, the President’s memorable line regarding Haitian migrants – “they’re eating the dogs, they’re eating the cats” – has become a cultural sensation, drowning out virtually all other coverage of the debate, and even becoming a viral hit on social media platforms like TikTok.

Contrary to what the pundit class would like you to believe, President Trump’s debate performance against Kamala Harris on Tuesday was one of his best – particularly in terms of the outcome it yielded.  The chosen location city of Philadelphia was more than just ceremonial; Philadelphia is the largest city in the most pivotal battleground state of Pennsylvania, which boasts 19 electoral votes – more than any other of the seven “key” swing states.  Thus, the President went into the night with the task of appealing to undecided and Independent voters, situated particularly in Pennsylvania and adjacent rustbelt battleground states like Michigan and Wisconsin.

President Trump delivered a vintage debate performance last night, taking on not only Kamala Harris, but ABC’s two debate monitors, David Muir and Linsey Davis, whose hostile questions and fact-checking primarily, if not exclusively, were directed at the 45th President.   The 45th President displayed a masterclass in polemics to over 50 million viewers – with fair-minded commentators ranking it among one of the President’s best.

There’s much to be cautiously optimistic about down this homestretch of the campaign season, with President Trump’s poll numbers widening almost by the day now over Kamala Harris, whose manufactured honeymoon period now appears to be in the distant past.

More than any other election year since the advent of television has the results of a presidential debate proved so consequential.  As of this writing, President Trump has the momentum on his side.

Americans Are Desperately Waiting For The Greatest Jobs President Ever To Return To The White House Last week’s jobs report by the Bureau of Labor Statistics presented an absolutely nightmarish scenario for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.  Based on the report, the economy lost over 438,000 full-time jobs, continuing a harrowing trend of paltry job growth since mid-June of last year.  Outside of government services, virtually no new jobs were created whatsoever.  Perhaps most distressing of all, a staggering 1.3 million native-born American jobs, across every demographic group, have been lost over the past year.  Meanwhile, 1.2 million jobs have been created for foreign-born workers, a significant portion of these being illegal laborers, who have flooded our country to the tune of tens of millions as a result of the catastrophic immigration policies of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

The political and legal world was taken by storm on Thursday when a video of SDNY Chief of Public Affairs, Nicholas Biase, surfaced on X, the social media platform, in which Biase criticized the “nonsense” lawfare being waged by Alvin Bragg, Letitia James, and Fani Willis against President Donald Trump.  The DOJ spokesman denounced these witch-hunts as a “perversion,” “travesty,” and “mockery” of the justice system, calling them “disgusting” and “nonsense” attempts to tarnish the reputation of an innocent man, in order to acquire notoriety and fame in the process.

September has officially arrived.  With the change in the calendar, the air in many regions of the country has already gotten noticeably crisper.  Autumn looms.   And as swift as the seasonal tides have changed, so too has the momentum in this presidential contest.

The takeaway of any honest viewer of Kamala Harris’ much-lambasted interview with CNN’s Dana Bash this past week is that of someone overwhelmed – burdened, one might say – by the stresses of campaigning, and for that reason, wholly unsuited to the office that she seeks.  Even though the Left would beg to differ, one can still level a criticism against a so-called “person of color” that is not based on race or gender, but rather, stands alone as an objective assessment of the candidate’s performance.

Kamala Harris is a slick political opportunist, who will say and do anything that is required of her to win the general election.

By now, it should be common knowledge that Kamala Harris has been serving as Joe Biden’s “border czar” for much of the past four years.  In this role, she owns the disaster at the border more than any other Biden administration official, including the president himself.  Since taking office in January of 2021, more than ten million illegal aliens have unlawfully penetrated the US-Mexico border.  These border crossers have brought untold amounts of illegal drugs, like fentanyl, and violent crime, including homicide, rape, and human trafficking, that have propelled the crime figures in virtually every major American city to the highest recorded rates ever.   Women and children have been disproportionately harmed by the Biden-Harris open border; stories like Laken Riley, Rachel Morin, and Jocelyn Nungaray – all young American women with years of life still to go, murdered in cold blood by an illegal who should never in a million

What better way to derail the momentum of an overall lackluster Democratic National Convention than to have the greatest third-party challenger for the presidency of the last three decades, who just so happened to be a member of America’s most famous Democratic political dynasty, endorse the Republican candidate for President of the United States: Donald J.

President Trump has a 3-point lead over Kamala Harris, according to the results of this week’s Rasmussen poll.

Not that it needed to be repeated, but the Democratic Party’s agenda now being rolled out at this week’s convention includes some of the most radical ever seen from a major political party in American history.  Kamala Harris, whose father was a Marxist economist, has embraced a smorgasbord of socialist policies, ranging from price controls to sky-high taxes on ‘unrealized capital gains,’ to even more mass migration – all with the apparent design to put Maduro’s Venezuela or Castro’s Cuba to shame.  If not that, what else?

The specter of 82-year-old Biden opening a half-empty Democratic National Convention alongside 76-year-old Hillary Clinton, whose obvious envy of the prospect that not she but another woman would be coronated Democratic nominee was a pathetic, borderline tragic, display of the party that once produced such giants like Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, and John F.

At long last, the Kamala Honeymoon appears to be flaming out.

  Donald Trump’s X Space last Monday with Elon Musk, in which the 45th President sat-down with the world’s richest man for a sprawling, nearly 3-hour long conversation reminiscent of a sort of high-tech fireside chat of an earlier age, was in every sense of the term, record-breaking.  The wide-ranging discussion that touched on everything from the assassination attempt on President Trump’s life, to electric vehicles and energy policy, to the prospect of nuclear war – was noteworthy for its substance and depth.

On Monday, in yet another affront to America’s justice system, the Department of Justice sentenced a 72-year-old woman to a half year house arrest, with restrictions on her internet use, 12 month probation, and a $103,000 fine.  Rebecca Lavrenz, who is known as the “J6 praying grandma,” never committed a violent crime, let alone a felony.  Before January 6th, 2021, she had a squeaky-clean record without so much as a speeding ticket.  Now, she is, in the blistering words of the government, “a threat to future acts of political violence like that which engulfed the nation on January 6.” Despite that ominous rhetoric, it’s unclear – even with having read the Government’s recently issued Sentencing Memo several times over thoroughly – just, what, precisely, she did.