0% found this document useful (0 votes)
196 views2 pages

Fair Fight Action vs. Raffensperger - Order (Dec. 16, 2019)

The court will hold a hearing on December 19th at 2pm to consider the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. The court orders the defendants to file…
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
196 views2 pages

Fair Fight Action vs. Raffensperger - Order (Dec. 16, 2019)

The court will hold a hearing on December 19th at 2pm to consider the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. The court orders the defendants to file a response brief by 5pm on December 17th. Additionally, to allow time for the hearing and ruling, the court uses its inherent authority to order the defendants to maintain the status quo and not conduct any voter purges until further court order.

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
196 views2 pages

Fair Fight Action vs. Raffensperger - Order (Dec. 16, 2019)

The court will hold a hearing on December 19th at 2pm to consider the plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. The court orders the defendants to file…
You are on page 1
2
 
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 1:18-CV-5391-SCJ ORDER
The Court will hold a hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Temporary
Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (Doc. No. [159]) on
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 19, 2019 at 2:00 P.M.
 The following expedited briefing schedule shall govern. Defendants shall file a response brief by
5 P.M., DECEMBER 17, 2019
. In the interim
and pursuant to the Court’s inherent
authority to control the litigation and the conduct of litigants, the Court further
ORDERS
 that Defendants shall maintain the status quo (i.e., no voter purge) in
FAIR FIGHT ACTION, INC.,
et al.
 , Plaintiffs, v. BRAD RAFFENSPERGER,
et al.,
 Defendants.
Case 1:18-cv-05391-SCJ Document 162 Filed 12/16/19 Page 1 of 2
 
2
order to allow the Court sufficient time to hold the above-stated hearing and issue a proper ruling.
1
 
IT IS SO ORDERED
 this _______ 
 
day of December, 2019.  _____________________________________
HONORABLE STEVE C. JONES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
 
See generally Martin v. Automobili Lamborghini Exclusive, Inc., 307 F.3d 1332, 1335 (11th Cir. 2002) (discussing inherent authority).
16ths/Steve C. Jones
Case 1:18-cv-05391-SCJ Document 162 Filed 12/16/19 Page 2 of 2
576648e32a3d8b82ca71961b7a986505