Stick to the facts when telling a story: Flamboyant tales can make hard-hitting information less meaningful, study finds

  • Northwestern University researchers looked at effectiveness of conveying facts
  • They replicated findings with two other studies, which substantiated results 
  • Suggests stories direct people away from weak data and reduce processing

Storytelling can detract from the credibility of cold, hard facts, new data suggests.  

Researchers from Northwestern University, Illinois, studied nearly 400 adults and found that shrouding information in anecdotes often detracts from their impact.  

They found flamboyant tales should be used for weak facts as it can increase their persuasiveness.

But the academics warned that when it comes to strong facts they are more persuasive on their own and do not need to be accompanied with a narrative.  

Scroll down for video  

Keep it simple: The researchers from Northwestern University found that facts alone led to more persuasion than a story with the facts embedded within it

Keep it simple: The researchers from Northwestern University found that facts alone led to more persuasion than a story with the facts embedded within it

WHAT WAS STUDIED? 

To test this interplay between facts, stories, and persuasion, Krause and Rucker had 397 U.S. adults evaluate a set of either all strong or all weak facts about a fictitious brand of cell phone called Moonstone. 

The researchers found that facts alone led to more persuasion than a story with the facts embedded within it.

Krause replicated the first study, this time with 389 U.S. adults, and observed similar results.

A third study occurred in a lab setting, and changed the content. In this experiment, 293 people read about a fictitious flu medicine, either on its own or embedded within a story.

Advertisement

'Stories persuade, at least in part, by disrupting the ability to evaluate facts, rather than just biasing a person to think positively,' says Rebecca Krause, who coauthored the paper with Derek Rucker.  

To test this theory, the pair studied 397 U.S. adults who evaluated a set of facts about a fictitious mobile phone brand, called Moonstone. 

Half of the people read only 'facts' about the product, while the other half read stories which contained 'facts'. 

The researchers found that facts alone led to more persuasion than a story with the facts embedded within it. 

Ms Krause replicated the first study, this time with 389 U.S. adults, and observed similar results.

A third study occurred in a lab setting, and changed the content. In this experiment, 293 people read about a fictitious flu medicine, either on its own or embedded within a story.

Once again, they found that facts were more readily believed when presented alone. 

Stories help persuasion when facts are weak, but they hurt persuasion when facts are strong

Stories help persuasion when facts are weak, but they hurt persuasion when facts are strong

These results, the researchers suggest, could be because stories direct people away from weak information and reduce people’s general processing. 

As a consequence, stories help persuasion when facts are weak, but they hurt persuasion when facts are strong. 

'Knowing that stories may provide the most persuasive benefit to those with the least compelling arguments could be important given concerns about fake news,' suggests Ms Krause. 

'But this does not mean a story is indicative of weak facts. Rather, when you feel especially compelled by a great story you might want to give more thought and consideration to the facts to determine how good they are.'

The study was published in the Society for Personality and Social Development.    

WHAT ARE THE NINE WAYS TO SPOT A LIAR?

The big pause: Lying is quite a complex process for the body and brain to deal with. First your brain produces the truth which it then has to suppress before inventing the lie and the performance of that lie. 

This often leads to a longer pause than normal before answering, plus a verbal stalling technique like ‘Why do you ask that?’ rather than a direct and open response.

The eye dart: Humans have more eye expressions than any other animal and our eyes can give away if we’re trying to hide something. 

When we look up to our left to think we’re often accessing recalled memory, but when our eyes roll up to our right we can be thinking more creatively. Also, the guilt of a lie often makes people use an eye contact cut-off gesture, such as looking down or away.

The lost breath: Bending the truth causes an instant stress response in most people, meaning the fight or flight mechanisms are activated. 

The mouth dries, the body sweats more, the pulse rate quickens and the rhythm of the breathing changes to shorter, shallower breaths that can often be both seen and heard.

Overcompensating: A liar will often over-perform, both speaking and gesticulating too much in a bid to be more convincing. These over the top body language rituals can involve too much eye contact (often without blinking!) and over-emphatic gesticulation.

The more someone gesticulates, the more likely it is they might be fibbing (stock image)

The more someone gesticulates, the more likely it is they might be fibbing (stock image)

The poker face: Although some people prefer to employ the poker face, many assume less is more and almost shut down in terms of movement and eye contact when they’re being economical with the truth.

The face hide: When someone tells a lie they often suffer a strong desire to hide their face from their audience. This can lead to a partial cut-off gesture like the well-know nose touch or mouth-cover.

Self-comfort touches: The stress and discomfort of lying often produces gestures that are aimed at comforting the liar, such as rocking, hair-stroking or twiddling or playing with wedding rings. We all tend to use self-comfort gestures but this will increase dramatically when someone is fibbing.

Micro-gestures: These are very small gestures or facial expressions that can flash across the face so quickly they are difficult to see. Experts will often use filmed footage that is then slowed down to pick up on the true body language response emerging in the middle of the performed lie. 

The best time to spot these in real life is to look for the facial expression that occurs after the liar has finished speaking. The mouth might skew or the eyes roll in an instant give-away.

Heckling hands: The hardest body parts to act with are the hands or feet and liars often struggle to keep them on-message while they lie. 

When the gestures and the words are at odds it’s called incongruent gesticulation and it’s often the hands or feet that are telling the truth.

Advertisement