Stick to the facts when telling a story: Flamboyant tales can make hard-hitting information less meaningful, study finds
- Northwestern University researchers looked at effectiveness of conveying facts
- They replicated findings with two other studies, which substantiated results
- Suggests stories direct people away from weak data and reduce processing
Storytelling can detract from the credibility of cold, hard facts, new data suggests.
Researchers from Northwestern University, Illinois, studied nearly 400 adults and found that shrouding information in anecdotes often detracts from their impact.
They found flamboyant tales should be used for weak facts as it can increase their persuasiveness.
But the academics warned that when it comes to strong facts they are more persuasive on their own and do not need to be accompanied with a narrative.
Scroll down for video
Keep it simple: The researchers from Northwestern University found that facts alone led to more persuasion than a story with the facts embedded within it
'Stories persuade, at least in part, by disrupting the ability to evaluate facts, rather than just biasing a person to think positively,' says Rebecca Krause, who coauthored the paper with Derek Rucker.
To test this theory, the pair studied 397 U.S. adults who evaluated a set of facts about a fictitious mobile phone brand, called Moonstone.
Half of the people read only 'facts' about the product, while the other half read stories which contained 'facts'.
The researchers found that facts alone led to more persuasion than a story with the facts embedded within it.
Ms Krause replicated the first study, this time with 389 U.S. adults, and observed similar results.
A third study occurred in a lab setting, and changed the content. In this experiment, 293 people read about a fictitious flu medicine, either on its own or embedded within a story.
Once again, they found that facts were more readily believed when presented alone.
Stories help persuasion when facts are weak, but they hurt persuasion when facts are strong
These results, the researchers suggest, could be because stories direct people away from weak information and reduce people’s general processing.
As a consequence, stories help persuasion when facts are weak, but they hurt persuasion when facts are strong.
'Knowing that stories may provide the most persuasive benefit to those with the least compelling arguments could be important given concerns about fake news,' suggests Ms Krause.
'But this does not mean a story is indicative of weak facts. Rather, when you feel especially compelled by a great story you might want to give more thought and consideration to the facts to determine how good they are.'
The study was published in the Society for Personality and Social Development.
Most watched News videos
- New video shows Epstein laughing and chasing young women
- British Airways passengers turn flight into a church service
- Epstein describes himself as a 'tier one' sexual predator
- Skier dressed as Chewbacca brutally beaten in mass brawl
- Two schoolboys plummet out the window of a moving bus
- Buddhist monks in Thailand caught with a stash of porn
- Melinda Gates says Bill Gates must answer questions about Epstein
- Police dog catches bag thief who pushed woman to the floor
- Holly Valance is shut down by GB News for using slur
- JD Vance turns up heat on Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor
- China unveils 'Star Wars' warship that can deploy unmanned jets
- Sarah Ferguson 'took Princesses' to see Epstein after prison
