Justice Secretary David Gauke showed 'no leadership' and should 'fall on his sword' and QUIT for refusing to challenge the decision to release black cab rapist John Worboys, MPs say

• e-mail

David Gauke (pictured in Parliament today) had suggested that he would mount a legal challenge against the Parole Board decision to release the rapist, but later U-turned

Justice Secretary David Gauke today faced calls to 'fall on his sword' and quit over his refusal to challenge the release black cab rapist John Worboys.

Mr Gauke had suggested that he would mount a legal challenge against the Parole Board decision to release the rapist, but later U-turned.

The serial sex attacker would have been free to walk the streets of Britain if his victims had not crowdfunded their own legal challenge and won their landmark High Court case to keep him locked up.

Today a Tory minister admitted Mr Gauke had 'made a mess' of the case while Conservative MPs also rounded on him and said he should consider resigning.

A Tory MP told the Telegraph he should quit over the scandal. They said: 'He f**ked up, he could not have f**ked up more.

'He showed no leadership at all, he allowed himself to be rolled by officials. He is fighting for his future, he has to take responsibility and consider his position.'

A Conservative minister told Mail Online: 'We seem to have made quite a mess of this. 

'It's a problem when you don't push back against advice. David raised hopes he was going to step in and then backed off.

'But David is well liked and has been a good minister. It isn't going to finish him.'

The victims of John Worboys (pictured)  stepped in to crowdfund their own legal challenge and today won their landmark High Court case to keep him locked up

Labour MP John Woodcock said Mr Gauke should go, telling The Sun: 'This ruling is a massive relief and shows David Gauke's refusal to appeal the parole board's decision was a monumental misjudgement.

'John Worboys would be free to walk the streets if it had been left to the government.

'There is clearly something badly wrong in the Ministry of Justice and Mr Gauke bears responsibility for the screw-up - he should fall on his sword.'

Meanwhile, bookies have slashed the odds of him being the next minister to leave the Government. 

The under fire Cabinet minister  had to go to the House of Commons to explain his decision after today's landmark ruling. 

Speaking during the Commons clash, Labour's shadow justice secretary Richard Burgon said the minister must 'accept responsibility in the failings for the dossier presented by the Ministry of Justice'.

Clashing with the minister in the Commons today, he added: 'Can you give more information on why he chose not to pursue his own judicial review.

Labour's shadow justice secretary Richard Burgon said the minister must 'accept responsibility in the failings for the dossier presented by the Ministry of Justice'.

'And to be blunt, do you regret your decision to pursue a cheap headline and brief the weekend newspapers in advance before properly checking if you could pursue a judicial review? 

'It is not just me asking this question, it has been reported that his conservative colleagues are asking this question a well  to the extent that the Prime Minister has been moved to say today that she still has full confidence in him.'

What are the reforms to the way parole boards operate does David Gauke want to bring in?

The Justice Secretary (pictured today) said he wanted to bring in reforms that would shatter the the secrecy that currently surrounds parole board decisions

David Gauke today vowed to usher in radical reforms to shatter the secrecy surrounding the way parole boards work in the wake of criticism over the John Worboys case.

The Justice Secretary said he wanted to bring in reforms that would shatter the  the secrecy that currently surrounds parole board decisions.

He wants to abolish the much criticised Rule 25 so that summaries of the decisions reached by parole boards can be given to victims affected.

And he said he also wants to create a system so that parole board decisions can go to an appeal which is heard by a judge led panel.

He told the Commons about his 'his intention to 'conduct further work to examine the Parole Board rules in their entirety'.

He added: 'As a result of the work that has been completed to date, I have already decided to abolish Rule 25 and will do so as soon as possible after the Easter recess,

'This will enable us to provide for the Parole Board to make available summaries of the decisions they make to victims. In addition, I will bring forward proposals for Parole Board decisions to be challenged.

'I intend to consult on the detail of these proposals by the end of April alongside other proposals to improve the way that victims are kept informed about the parole process.

'I will make a statement to Parliament this afternoon and set out our response to the judgment - and our next steps - in more detail.'

 

Advertisement

The Labour frontbencher said that it was only down to the tireless efforts of victims that Worboys, 60, is staying behind bars.

And he called for legal aid to be given to people mounting judicial review challenges.

Mr Burgon said: 'Personally I don't think it's right that victims of people like John Worboys have to crowdfund to pursue justice, because justice cannot depend on the depths of your pockets.'

He added: 'There have been widespread failings in this case from the very outset.'

Meanwhile, Ladbrokes said they slashed the odds of Mr Gauke being the next minister to leave Theresa May's Government from 50/1 to 5/1.

But Mr Gauke defended his decision saying that he followed the legal advice and made it clear he would not stand in the way of victims bringing their own case. 

He said: 'I made no secret that I was considering a judicial review …

'The reality was that the victims were in a better position to bring a successful case than I was.

'What is also very important is that we should ensure in the future that where the parole board reaches a conclusion that reaches certain criteria there is an ability for the parole board to be able to look again at this.' 

And he also apologies to the many victims of Worboys over the handling of the case.

He said: 'This case should have been much more effectively dealt with in terms of the Parole Board hearing.

'There should have been much greater probing, there should have been much greater testing of the case that Worboys was making to the Parole Board.

'And I deeply regret that that did not happen and I share the anger that he does the victims therefore had to go through this process and I'm sorry that that happened.'

And several Tory big-hitters backed the Justice Secretary and said it was right that he followed the legal advice.

Former justice secretary Ken Clarke came to the defence of Mr Gauke, saying that it would have been 'scandalous' to ignore the original legal advice not to launch a judicial review.

He said: 'It would be absolutely scandalous if he as Justice Secretary had ignored the legal advice he got, which sounds to be perfectly sensible on the basis of the facts available to him.

Worboys' black cab (pictured) was used to pick up victims who were offered cut price fares

'It would be a very bad day if ministers started intervening in criminal sentencing cases in response to campaigning and did not judge them objectively according to the rule of law and the public interest.'

Mr Gauke today vowed to overhaul how the parole board operates in response to the wave of public anger sparked by the Worboys case. 

He said he wanted to bring in reforms that would shatter the  the secrecy that currently surrounds parole board decisions.

The Justice Secretary said he wants to abolish the much criticised Rule 25 so that summaries of the decisions reached by parole boards can be given to victims affected.

And he said he also wants to create a system so that parole board decisions can go to an appeal which is heard by a judge led panel.

He told the Commons: 'As a result of the work that has been completed to date, I have already decided to abolish Rule 25 and will do so as soon as possible after the Easter recess,

'This will enable us to provide for the Parole Board to make available summaries of the decisions they make to victims. In addition, I will bring forward proposals for Parole Board decisions to be challenged.

'I intend to consult on the detail of these proposals by the end of April alongside other proposals to improve the way that victims are kept informed about the parole process.

'I will make a statement to Parliament this afternoon and set out our response to the judgment - and our next steps - in more detail.'    

Worboys was due to be released from prison but judges at London's High Court ordered the parole board to review their flawed decision to free him.

The serial sex attacker was prosecuted for attacks on 12 women but police believe he may have more than 100 victims making him perhaps the most prolific sex attacker ever.

The judges found there were flaws in the decisions to release him and the chairman of the Parole Board, Professor Nick Hardwick, was forced to quit today in response to the scandal.

One of the victims said: 'I can get on with my life again without looking over my shoulder. The constant reminders in the news have been distressing and made me want to hide.'

But there is growing anger at the Justice Secretary that the women were forced to bring the case themselves, rather than the government taking action.

Today's ruling means the decision over whether to release Worboys will go back before a different parole panel.

A  new decision is not expected for several months, during which Worboys will remain behind bars. 

A prison van carrying Worboys leaves the Royal Courts of Justice after the hearing in February