Property developer is refused permission to open his holiday let after backlash from locals over 'horrendous' 18ft window
A property developer has been refused permission to open his holiday let over a 'horrendous' giant window.
Villagers were left fuming after the huge 18ft window was added to the property in the Welsh countryside without planning permission.
Although the home was initially recommended for approval in January, a wave of objections from locals came over the 'disrespect' of fitting the tall window.
Planners have now rejected backdated permission for Karl Jones's development at Penisarwaun near Caernarfon, North Wales, to be a holiday let.
Villagers said allowing the holiday let would be a 'harmful effect on a small, quiet area of rural Wales.'
They feared a holiday accommodation would cause traffic, litter and noise - and residents would lose their privacy.
Planning officer Keira Sweenie argued that the holiday let was not excessively large and met policy requirements.
She added that completing work before obtaining permission 'was not a valid reason to refuse.'
This 18ft window left locals in North Wales fuming after it was fitted without permission
Pictured: The original home before the 'horrendous' large window was fitted
Pictured: The planning application that was submitted by the housing developer
The developer was given 'an opportunity' to minimise overlooking and requested to provide documents detailing the operating rules of the holiday let to ease concerns from neighbours.
But planners said 'none were submitted'.
Local councillor Elwyn Jones said the development had proceeded 'without any kind of planning application and affected several nearby properties.'
'The message here is, if you are uncertain, then do it anyway, don't respond, and everything will go through in the end,' he said. 'That is what I see from this.'
'I saw the original building, and this is certainly not at the original height - there is no way to prove that now because the development has been completed.
'Should a usual application have come in with this, due to its location and the building, I'm almost certain it would have been refused.'
Cllr Gruff Williams added: 'When it came up last time, we didn't ask for a pair of curtains, we asked for them to block off windows to avoid overlooking - the developer does not care about our decisions.'
Cllr Louise Hughes noted that the developer 'just went ahead anyway disregarding the planning process'.
The redeveloped house has a modern look with a large glass front
The house has an absolutely stunning view out over the countryside of North Wales
Its interior has also been redone with plush turquoise sofas and a wooden finish
One bedroom has an orange velvet bed while the walls are painted navy blue
'He also ignored concerns of local people living next door. I was at the site visit and quite frankly that window is absolutely enormous and out of character,' she said.
'What sort of message does this send out? ''Don't worry because the planning committee will pass it anyway''.
'Yes, OK, I suppose it is within planning policy but it's the integrity of this decision, he's not made any movement to sort out the problems. I am not happy, it is a lack of respect for planning process and the planning committee.'
There is more glass for an indoor balcony in the new version of the house
The previous property had small windows and was not as modern at the new house
Cllr Gruff Williams said: 'When it came up last time we asked for them to block off windows to avoid overlooking - the developer does not care about our decisions'
Cllr Gareth Jones agreed, adding: 'I visited the site. That large window is horrendous. I don't know how it can be approved. It is massive. It does have a significant impact on amenities. It is obtrusive.'
Cllr Hughes said: 'It might be within the rules but is it morally right?'
'He has shown a lack of respect for every aspect of the planning application.
'It sends a message out there [to] do what you want, stake your claim, build what you like, let's have a drive-in McDonald's while you are at it.'
The committee voted on December 9, with five in favour of refusal and four against.
Most watched News videos
- New video shows Epstein laughing and chasing young women
- British Airways passengers turn flight into a church service
- Epstein describes himself as a 'tier one' sexual predator
- Skier dressed as Chewbacca brutally beaten in mass brawl
- Two schoolboys plummet out the window of a moving bus
- Holly Valance is shut down by GB News for using slur
- Police dog catches bag thief who pushed woman to the floor
- Melinda Gates says Bill Gates must answer questions about Epstein
- JD Vance turns up heat on Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor
- Buddhist monks in Thailand caught with a stash of porn
- China unveils 'Star Wars' warship that can deploy unmanned jets
- Trump slams Kaitlan Collins for lack of smiling over Epstein grilling
