Fidelity slashes fund charge
FUND giant Fidelity has challenged the investment industry by slashing the annual charge on one of its key funds to just 0.1%.
Fidelity, the UK's largest mutual fund manager, has made the bold move on its Fidelity MoneyBuilder UK Index fund, which aims to mirror the performance of the FTSE All-Share index.
Funds track stock markets using automated systems rather than relying on well-paid managers to pick stocks so charges tend to be lower.
However, Fidelity claims some firms are ripping off investors. Richard Wastcoat, Fidelity's UK managing director, said: 'Index funds are commodity products and should be bought primarily on price. There is no reason for fund companies to charge upwards of 1% on these funds, let alone levy an initial charge as well.'
The most well known offender is the giant Virgin fund, which charges 1% a year on £2bn of investors' money. The fund, which ranks in the top five most widely-held among This is Money Power Portfolio users, was among the first index trackers to be offered to small investors in the late Nineties, attracting huge interest when the stock market was booming.
Providers have since launched far cheaper UK trackers. M&G, for example, charges 0.3% a year while independent financial adviser Hargreaves Lansdown offers an HSBC FTSE All-Share tracker for a 0.25% yearly fee.
Fitzrovia, a fund analyst, measures the entire cost of investing with a total expense ratio (TER). The ratio takes into account other costs of running fund not included in the annual fee.
Fitzrovia says the cheapest trackers are Abbey National Stockmarket 100 Tracker Growth (0.35%), F&C FTSE All-Share Tracker (0.35%), Liontrust Top 100 (0.39%), M&G (0.49%). Fidelity says its tracker TER is now the lowest on the market at 0.3%.
However, Hargreaves Lansdown also claims their TER is the lowest. HL repackages an HSBC tracker that is usually only available to City insitutions. The company claims the fund carries no other additional charges because of the way it is packaged, so the TER matches the annual fee of 0.25% - cheaper than Fidelity's 0.3%, although this is not validated by a third party analyst such as Fitzrovia.
'We welcome this move by Fidelity as its good for the industry,' said Ben Yearsley of Hargreaves Lansdown. 'Most trackers, at 1%, are four times more expensive than they should be and this helps to highlight that.'
An argument continues to rage in the fund management industry about the widsom of trackers vs 'actively managed' funds. The low fees on trackers compare to 'active' funds run by managers which typically charge 1.5% a year, plus a fee of between 1% and 5% on any new money invested.
• TIPS & TACTICS: Independent fund recommendations
• FREE TiM SERVICE: Order fund brochures
The move by Fidelity is also a sign of growing confidence among fund management companies, keen to cash in on fresh optimism among investors following a near-60% rise in the FTSE 100 in the past two-and-a-half years.
Fidelity's Richard Waistcoat added: 'This is also part of a wider Fidelity campaign to champion the benefits of stock market investment – a crucial message if we want to close the savings gap.
'In recent years, some people have abandoned the stock market in favour of cash, so missing the opportunity for improved returns. We hope this fee cut will help to rekindle the equity habit.'
Most watched Money videos
- Here's the one thing you need to do to boost state pension
- Is the latest BYD plug-in hybrid worth the £30,000 price tag?
- Phil Spencer invests in firm to help list holiday lodges
- Jaguar's £140k EV spotted testing in the Arctic Circle
- Five things to know about Tesla Model Y Standard
- Reviewing the new 2026 Ineos Grenadier off-road vehicles
- Richard Hammond to sell four cars from private collection
- Putting Triumph's new revamped retro motorcycles to the test
- Can my daughter inherit my local government pension?
- Is the new MG EV worth the cost? Here are five things you need to know
- Daily Mail rides inside Jaguar's first car in all-electric rebrand
- Markets are riding high but some investments are still cheap
-
How to use reverse budgeting to get to the end of the...
-
China bans hidden 'pop-out' car door handles popularised...
-
At least 1m people have missed the self-assessment tax...
-
Britain's largest bitcoin treasury company debuts on...
-
Bank of England expected to hold rates this week - but...
-
Irn-Bru owner snaps up Fentimans and Frobishers as it...
-
One in 45 British homeowners are sitting on a property...
-
Elon Musk confirms SpaceX merger with AI platform behind...
-
Sellers ripped carpets and appliances out of my new home....
-
My son died eight months ago but his employer STILL...
-
Satellite specialist Filtronic sees profits slip despite...
-
Plus500 shares jump as it announces launch of predictions...
-
Overpayment trick that can save you an astonishing...
-
Civil service pensions in MELTDOWN: Rod, 70, could lose...
-
UK data champions under siege as the AI revolution...
-
Shoppers spend £2m a day less at Asda as troubled...
-
AI lawyer bots wipe £12bn off software companies - but...
-
Prepare for blast-off: Elon Musk's £900bn SpaceX deal...




























