Help with pension calculation
I am in a final-salary pension scheme and paying AVCs. Due to a change to my pension scheme I now have to decide whether to increase my contributions by 3.25% to get the same amount of pension at 60 or take a reduced pension at 60. Alternatively I could stay working until 62 to get the original amount of pension.
Would I be better off increasing my AVCs instead of paying additional pension contributions and then get a larger lump sum from the AVCs?
I calculate that at 60 my pension would be £1,580pa less if I do not increase my pension contributions but my lump sum would be £17,000 more if AVCs increased instead. At 62, when I expect to retire, I would get £1210pa less pension but my AVC lump sum would be £21,000 more.
As the lump sum is non taxable and the pension would be taxed, which way would I be better off? My pension would rise with inflation each year up to 5% cap. What is the likely return on savings if I invested the lump sum and each year took the difference in pension from the lump sum investing the rest? I am 49 years old. EB, Sunbury-on-Thames
Danny Cox, Chartered Financial Planner with IFA Hargreaves Lansdown, replies: In simple terms, you have calculated that you are being asked to pay 3.25% more to avoid losing £1,580 of pension per annum or you could pay this 3.25% into the AVC which would enable to you get £17,000 more tax free cash but at the expense of income.
The key question is whether, over time, the income stream will be worth more than the capital.
If we put this another way - could the £17,000 generate for you £1,580 per annum gross, an equivalent rate of return of 9.2%?
You should also bear in mind that the pension of £1,580 per annum will be index linked and have some spouse's benefit on your death. It is therefore more valuable if you are married and both you and your husband are in good health.
If you wanted to 'buy' this income stream on the open market it would cost you around £30,000 and, based on average life expectancy, it will be in payment until you are around age 85. This makes the £17,000 you would get as an alternative look less good value for money. But you would always have the capital.
Most watched Money videos
- Here's the one thing you need to do to boost state pension
- Phil Spencer invests in firm to help list holiday lodges
- Is the latest BYD plug-in hybrid worth the £30,000 price tag?
- Jaguar's £140k EV spotted testing in the Arctic Circle
- Can my daughter inherit my local government pension?
- Five things to know about Tesla Model Y Standard
- Reviewing the new 2026 Ineos Grenadier off-road vehicles
- Putting Triumph's new revamped retro motorcycles to the test
- Richard Hammond to sell four cars from private collection
- Is the new MG EV worth the cost? Here are five things you need to know
- Steve Webb answers reader question about passing on pension
- Daily Mail rides inside Jaguar's first car in all-electric rebrand
-
China bans hidden 'pop-out' car door handles popularised...
-
FTSE 100 soars to fresh high despite metal price rout:...
-
At least 1m people have missed the self-assessment tax...
-
Irn-Bru owner snaps up Fentimans and Frobishers as it...
-
Fears AstraZeneca will quit the London Stock Market as...
-
Britain's largest bitcoin treasury company debuts on...
-
Thames Water's mucky debt deal offers little hope that it...
-
One in 45 British homeowners are sitting on a property...
-
Elon Musk confirms SpaceX merger with AI platform behind...
-
How to use reverse budgeting to get to the end of the...
-
Bank of England expected to hold rates this week - but...
-
Insurer Zurich admits it owns £100m stake in...
-
Satellite specialist Filtronic sees profits slip despite...
-
Plus500 shares jump as it announces launch of predictions...
-
Overhaul sees Glaxo slash 350 research and development...
-
Mortgage rates back on the rise? Three more major lenders...
-
Revealed: The sneaky tricks to find out if you've won a...
-
Porch pirates are on the rise... and these are areas most...
