Smart bosses learn to bend
BOSSES who turn down requests for flexible working are missing a golden opportunity to boost productivity, according to new research. And it can be costly, too - pregnant executive Michelle Langton won £40,000 and the right to work part-time when she took City law firm Herbert Smith to an employment tribunal.

Working Families, a charity that aims to improve work-life balance, found that flexible workers reckon they are more productive, while those on normal hours believe that flexible working would improve their output.
Evidence suggests that flexible workers are far less likely to call in sick. There is also a clear link between productivity, work-life balance and good management, with the most productive workers feeling that they are the best-managed.
Reluctant employers are being swayed by the financial benefits of flexible working. Professor Cary Cooper, an expert in organisational psychology at Lancaster University, worked on the research and says: 'The fact is that the only way to get policy-makers to listen is to show them the impact.' Telecoms giant BT has embraced flexible working, with options that include working from home, job sharing and parttime positions.
David Dunbar, BT's head of work styles, has worked flexibly for years. He is in London for two days of the working week and spends the rest of it at his home office in Belhaven, near Edinburgh. David, 41, says: 'I'm not at my best in the morning, but I can get a lot done later in the day. If I was tied to a nine-to-five office job, I would definitely not be as productive.'
Staff at MSN, part of Microsoft, can work from home, operate flexitime or compressed working and take sabbaticals. Strikingly, 85% of its employees now work flexibly, including 49% of men, and business growth has increased by 66%.
Sarah Jackson, chief executive of Working Families, says: 'Flexible workers are not only more committed and motivated, but more productive, too. Flexible working is clearly linked to increased productivity and financial gains.
'Those who continue to see it purely as costly in terms of time will lose out on major short-term and long-term benefits to their organisations.'
Most watched Money videos
- Here's the one thing you need to do to boost state pension
- Is the latest BYD plug-in hybrid worth the £30,000 price tag?
- Phil Spencer invests in firm to help list holiday lodges
- Jaguar's £140k EV spotted testing in the Arctic Circle
- Five things to know about Tesla Model Y Standard
- Reviewing the new 2026 Ineos Grenadier off-road vehicles
- Richard Hammond to sell four cars from private collection
- Putting Triumph's new revamped retro motorcycles to the test
- Can my daughter inherit my local government pension?
- Is the new MG EV worth the cost? Here are five things you need to know
- Daily Mail rides inside Jaguar's first car in all-electric rebrand
- Markets are riding high but some investments are still cheap
-
How to use reverse budgeting to get to the end of the...
-
China bans hidden 'pop-out' car door handles popularised...
-
At least 1m people have missed the self-assessment tax...
-
Britain's largest bitcoin treasury company debuts on...
-
Bank of England expected to hold rates this week - but...
-
Irn-Bru owner snaps up Fentimans and Frobishers as it...
-
One in 45 British homeowners are sitting on a property...
-
Sellers ripped carpets and appliances out of my new home....
-
Elon Musk confirms SpaceX merger with AI platform behind...
-
My son died eight months ago but his employer STILL...
-
Satellite specialist Filtronic sees profits slip despite...
-
Plus500 shares jump as it announces launch of predictions...
-
Overpayment trick that can save you an astonishing...
-
Shoppers spend £2m a day less at Asda as troubled...
-
Civil service pensions in MELTDOWN: Rod, 70, could lose...
-
UK data champions under siege as the AI revolution...
-
AI lawyer bots wipe £12bn off software companies - but...
-
Prepare for blast-off: Elon Musk's £900bn SpaceX deal...
