This paper examines the multifaceted role of silence in the medieval romance La Mort Artu and its psychoanalytic and symbolic implications. Far from being a mere absence of speech, silence emerges as a vector of meaning, desire, and inner...
moreThis paper examines the multifaceted role of silence in the medieval romance La Mort Artu and its psychoanalytic and symbolic implications. Far from being a mere absence of speech, silence emerges as a vector of meaning, desire, and inner conflict, shaping both narrative structure and character subjectivity. Through a dual approach—narratological and psychoanalytic—the study distinguishes between the silence of the work (narrative omissions, ellipses, and structural gaps) and the silence within the work (the characters’ muteness and withheld speech). These two dimensions reveal a writing system in which the unsaid becomes a secondary language, expressing repressed impulses, moral prohibitions, and unconscious tensions.
Drawing on Freud’s concepts of repression, the death drive, and sublimation, as well as Lacan’s notion of symbolic castration, this analysis highlights silence as both a defensive mechanism and a site of revelation. The muteness of the characters—especially in relation to adultery and incest—reflects a deep struggle between passion and law, guilt and the chivalric ideal. Silence thus functions as both a tragic motor and a principle of order, a symptom of a collapsing Arthurian world.
Ultimately, La Mort Artu emerges as a narrative where speech exhausts itself before fate, and where silence—echoing psychoanalytic theory—embodies the temptation of return to non-being, the ultimate fusion of desire and death.