Key research themes
1. How does aesthetic appeal influence visual attention and decision-making mechanisms in preferential looking?
This research theme investigates the role of subjective aesthetic evaluations—such as appeal, attractiveness, and beauty—in shaping visual attention patterns and decision biases during preferential looking tasks. Understanding this interplay is crucial for elucidating how aesthetic properties impact cognitive processes like search efficiency, gaze allocation, and choice behavior in real-time.
2. What are the cultural and perceptual factors that modulate directionality and symmetry preferences during preferential looking?
This theme explores how cultural backgrounds, perceptual familiarity, and stimulus properties influence directional biases and symmetry preferences—key visual features involved in aesthetic evaluation during preferential looking. These studies examine cross-cultural divergences, effects of stimulus symmetry on attractiveness judgments, and how these preferences are instantiated in eye movement and choice behavior.
3. How do physical attributes and masked occlusion affect perceived attractiveness in preferential looking contexts?
This theme addresses how specific physical features—including facial symmetry, lip appearance, tooth shade, and mask wearing—modulate attractiveness perceptions during preferential looking or related rating tasks. These studies reveal how both visible traits and occlusive conditions impact aesthetic evaluations, with implications for understanding real-world social visual preferences.








































![Number of switches during control and test trials by age and language group (Experiments 1 and 2). looked less at the matching screen during the 2nd half of the test trial; in contrast, 2-year-old Turkish learners show an increased preference for the match during the 2nd half. The ANOVA for the 3-year-old group yielded only a significant effect of trial [F(1,64) = 14.272, p<.001, Np = .18]. Similar patterns are observed within each language. An ANOVA for the English learners yielded only a significant interac- tion of trial and age [F(1,72) = 4.433, p=.015, Nb = .11], with 3-year-olds showing stronger matching preferences during the 2nd half of the trial than 1- and 2-year-olds, whereas for the Turkish learn- ers the ANOVA yielded only a main effect of trial type [F(1,106)=4.772, p=.03, np = .04]. Degree of comprehension (captured by the difference between test and control scores) was not correlated with Mullen subscores in either language group.](https://figures.academia-assets.com/50225519/table_004.jpg)





![Ficure 6. ACTIVE performance, as a function of (A) absolute target location (in degrees and centimeters, measured from the bottom-left of the screen), and (B) relative target location (relative to gaze-position at trial-onset). The green circles and red crosses in (A) indicate individual hit anc miss trials, respectively, for all infants. The circular histogram in (B) indicates percent correct for 12 equal bins (7 bins was arbitrary, but did not qualitatively affect the result), and the mean across all bins (red, dashed circle). Black dashed lines in (A) and (B) show the four location quadrants used during statistical analyses (see body text). The apparent annulus of points in ([A]; radius = 8°) reflects the fact that the probability of a centra fixation at trial-onset was greater than chance (either because the previous target was located there, or because of the content of the intertria cartoon).](https://figures.academia-assets.com/46405326/figure_006.jpg)











