Key research themes
1. How does sensorimotor experience and motor system activation causally influence action perception and understanding?
This research theme investigates the extent to which neural activity in the motor system is critical for perceiving and understanding others’ actions. It examines whether observation-related motor activations are causally necessary for action perception, or merely correlational, with a focus on sensorimotor learning and brain stimulation methods to establish causality. Understanding this relationship is vital for theories of social cognition and embodied simulation that argue for motor contributions in action understanding.
2. How are observed actions and object events represented and coded in the brain, and what neural mechanisms underlie their perception and integration?
This theme explores the neural coding of actions and non-animate object events in the action observation network (AON), emphasizing whether the brain represents these event types via a shared neural code invariant to the animacy and modality of stimuli. Research here employs multivariate pattern analyses to dissociate representation content from general stimulus features, shedding light on fundamental neural mechanisms of event perception and action understanding beyond classic mirror neuron literature.
3. How do temporal and multisensory integration mechanisms enable the coupling of perception and action, and what are the perceptual consequences of these interactions?
This research area focuses on temporal coordination between action execution and perceptual processing and the sensory integration that supports unified conscious experience across senses relevant for coordinated behavior. Investigations include how action preparation affects perceptual timing, the conditions for multisensory integration based on temporal asynchrony, and the role of peripersonal space in coordinating perception and action. This has implications for understanding cross-modal perception, sensorimotor predictions, and sensorimotor control in social and individual contexts.

![Figure 3: An infant both within and abstracted from the environment. (e.g. Gesell and Thompson 1934, 1938, McGraw 1945, Shirley 1931) that continues to influence how we understand children’s embodiment and, indeed, on how we understand childhood at all. Research during this period represented a new scientific interest in children built upon the relatively new idea that their growth and change was a developmental process (Rose 1999). Possibly the most influential of the ‘Golden Age’ researchers[1], Arnold Gesell viewed Darwin as having ‘saved’ infants from the dubious attentions of philosophy and theology by positioning them as ‘proper’ objects of scientific interest (Thelen and Adolph 1992). He viewed his own research as an extension of Darwin’s project to discover and describe the ‘ideological order’ in human growth and development (1948, 36).](https://figures.academia-assets.com/119201692/figure_003.jpg)



















