Stonehenge

Stonehenge, The Prehistoric Megalithic Structure on Salisbury Plain. (Photo by Sonia Bonet on Shutterstock)

Microscopic Crystals Undercut The Idea That Glaciers Are Behind The Iconic Site

In A Nutshell

  • Scientists analyzed microscopic mineral grains in streams near Stonehenge to test whether glaciers once reached the site.
  • Out of 550 grains examined, only one matched the age signature of Welsh rocks.
  • If glaciers had carried Stonehenge’s stones, many more of those grains should be present.
  • The results make glacial transport very unlikely and point to human movement of the stones instead.

How did Stonehenge’s massive stones reach southern England? The answer to this age-old mystery may have been hiding in plain sight, scattered in the sand of nearby streams. Microscopic mineral crystals no wider than a human hair just revealed what thousands of tons of stone could not: glaciers almost certainly didn’t deliver Stonehenge’s building blocks. That means human transport is the most likely explanation.

Scientists examining sand from rivers around Stonehenge analyzed 550 zircon crystals, each smaller than a grain of table salt. These nearly indestructible minerals act as geological fingerprints, preserving evidence of where sediments originated millions of years ago. If ice sheets had scraped across Salisbury Plain (the chalk plateau Stonehenge is located on) during the Ice Age and deposited the monument’s famous bluestones from Wales, those telltale mineral signatures would be everywhere in local sediments. Out of those 550 tiny crystals, researchers found exactly one that matched Welsh rocks, providing strong evidence that glaciers didn’t reach the site.

The findings, published in Communications Earth & Environment by researchers Anthony Clarke and Christopher Kirkland from Curtin University, make it very difficult to argue for glacial transport. Stonehenge’s multi-ton stones from Wales and Scotland were most likely hauled there by people rather than by glaciers.

Stonehenge during sunset winter solstice
Stonehenge during the winter solstice sunset. (Chuta Kooanantkul/Shutterstock)

How Stonehenge Stones Were Transported: Geological Fingerprints

Zircon crystals are very small, yet they survive nearly everything nature throws at them. They persist through erosion, burial, chemical weathering, and recycling across millions of years. Each crystal contains uranium atoms that decay into lead at a predictable rate, creating an atomic clock that reveals when it originally formed.

Clarke and Kirkland collected sand from four streams draining Salisbury Plain, including the River Avon and River Wylye. After separating out the heavy minerals, they analyzed each zircon grain to determine its age. The results told an unexpected story: these crystals originally formed billions of years ago in ancient rocks from northern Britain. Crucially, the crystals don’t need glaciers to explain them. The study suggests they were recycled from older sediments that once covered parts of southern England, then washed into today’s streams.

This model demonstrates how the stones may have been transported at Stonehenge.
This model demonstrates how the stones may have been transported at Stonehenge. (Photo by A Perry on Unsplash)

Stonehenge Bluestone Origin: One Grain in 550

Stonehenge’s bluestones, volcanic rocks weighing between two and five tons each, came from Mynydd Preseli hills in Wales, about 230 kilometers away. These Welsh rocks formed around 464 million years ago, giving them a distinctive age signature. If glaciers had transported not just the massive bluestones but also countless smaller rock fragments across that distance, crystals with that 464-million-year-old signature should be common throughout Salisbury Plain’s stream sediments.

Yet only one was found. Out of 550 crystals analyzed, a single grain showed that diagnostic Welsh age. That’s less than two-tenths of one percent, far too rare to support glacial transport. The researchers note that even this lone grain was likely recycled from younger sedimentary rocks in southern England rather than arriving directly from Wales via ice.

Glaciers would have delivered these signature crystals alongside another mineral called apatite from the same source rocks. The team analyzed 250 apatite grains and found none with northern signatures. All pointed to local sources in the chalk under Salisbury Plain. If ice had scraped those northern rocks and carried them south, both types of crystals would be present. That is not the case.

Stonehenge Construction Evidence: Why Size Matters

Analyzing particles the width of a hair to determine the fate of stones weighing tons might seem backwards, but it’s precisely why this approach works. Glaciers crushing across landscapes pulverize bedrock into fine powder, or what geologists call glacial flour. This powder, carried by meltwater, can travel hundreds of kilometers beyond ice margins and sticks around in river systems long after glaciers retreat.

If ice sheets had scraped across Salisbury Plain, they would have left this microscopic calling card everywhere. Modern streams would be loaded with fine-grained crystals from northern Britain because zircon virtually never disappears once freed from parent rocks. Its near-total absence strongly suggests ice didn’t arrive, regardless of what happened to the larger stones.

Where the Crystals Actually Came From

Clarke and Kirkland compared their samples against crystal populations from sedimentary basins across Britain. The closest match came from ancient sands deposited around 60 million years ago in shallow seas that once covered southern England. These sediments once blanketed much of the region before being stripped away by erosion over the past 30 million years. As they wore down, durable zircon crystals were released and reworked into younger river systems: no ice required. The same crystal might erode from ancient rock, travel in rivers, get buried for millions of years, erode out again, and finally end up in a modern stream.

Human Achievement, Not Geological Accident

Thus, these findings strongly favor human agency in constructing Stonehenge. The glacial transport hypothesis required ice sheets to extend far south enough to deliver not just the bluestones from Wales but also the six-ton Altar Stone from Scotland, which is more than 700 kilometers away. Such extensive glaciation would have scattered distinctive mineral signatures throughout the landscape at all scales, from microscopic to megalithic.

During the Anglian Stage glaciation (roughly 480,000–420,000 years ago), reconstructions generally place the ice limit north of Salisbury Plain, and the plain itself lacks clear signs of being ice-covered. The microscopic evidence now makes it very difficult to argue that ice reached Stonehenge.

Neolithic communities had sophisticated organization and substantial labor capacity. Archaeological evidence documents their capabilities in quarrying, transporting, and erecting megaliths across Bronze Age Europe. Recent research traced the Altar Stone to northeast Scotland, requiring either an improbable glacial scenario or a remarkable feat of human engineering.

Thanks to this latest discovery, it’s becoming clear that Stonehenge is an example of astonishing human achievement, not a geological accident.


Paper Notes

Study Limitations

The research focused on detrital minerals in modern stream sediments, which represent a mixture of sources integrated over the catchment area. While the absence of diagnostic glacial signatures strongly suggests ice sheets never reached Salisbury Plain, the study cannot entirely rule out limited, localized glacial activity that left no detectable trace. The single 464-million-year-old zircon grain could theoretically represent glacially transported material, though the authors note recycling from younger sedimentary rocks provides a more parsimonious explanation. Apatite is less durable than zircon during sedimentary recycling, so its absence from northern source regions could reflect preferential destruction during transport rather than lack of glacial input. However, this would not explain the near-total absence of diagnostic zircon age peaks from potential glacial source regions.

Funding and Disclosures

This work was funded by the Timescales of Mineral Systems Group at Curtin University. Instruments in the John de Laeter Centre at Curtin University were supported by AuScope and the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy. The authors declare no competing interests. Stream sediment samples were collected from public ground following Environment Agency guidance and the Geological Society of London’s Code for Geological Fieldwork.

Publication Details

Authors: Anthony J. I. Clarke and Christopher L. Kirkland | Affiliation: Timescales of Mineral Systems Group, School of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia | Journal: Communications Earth & Environment |
Title: Detrital zircon–apatite fingerprinting challenges glacial transport of Stonehenge’s megaliths | Publication Date: Published online January 21, 2026
Volume/Issue: Volume 7, Article 54 | DOI: 10.1038/s43247-025-03105-3 | Article Type: Original Research Article | Supplementary Materials: Available online at DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.30690479

About StudyFinds Analysis

Called "brilliant," "fantastic," and "spot on" by scientists and researchers, our acclaimed StudyFinds Analysis articles are created using an exclusive AI-based model with complete human oversight by the StudyFinds Editorial Team. For these articles, we use an unparalleled LLM process across multiple systems to analyze entire journal papers, extract data, and create accurate, accessible content. Our writing and editing team proofreads and polishes each and every article before publishing. With recent studies showing that artificial intelligence can interpret scientific research as well as (or even better) than field experts and specialists, StudyFinds was among the earliest to adopt and test this technology before approving its widespread use on our site. We stand by our practice and continuously update our processes to ensure the very highest level of accuracy. Read our AI Policy (link below) for more information.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply

5 Comments

  1. Mac McGyver says:

    Where are the remnants, the offcuts, of the stones shaped for Stonehenge? Isn’t it likely that the stones were shaped and test fitted at the quarry of origin so there would be less weight to move? Have remnants been found at Stonehenge or were they hauled off and used for other structures over the millennia?

  2. Robert Falls says:

    Well, Fred and Barney moved them with the construction Dinos from work. Everyone knows this

  3. M says:

    This is laughable. I do not have a PHD and I already knew this. So much for the so called great minds.

  4. Dr. t says:

    this is such bullshit. the stones were moved by humans, and not a lot of them.
    for UNDENIABLE PROOF of this, look at the website of the now-deceased building contractor from Flint, MI who built his own mini-stonehenge BY HIMSELF. who fully explained the simple method he used to move the massive blocks into place and documented it. It is there for you to see, but this type behind this dumb article and expensive and pointless “research” will not look.
    Stonehenge is a bogus mystery, perpetuated by weak-minded academics who attempt to build their own reputations by inflating the “mystery of stonehenge.”

  5. IToldYou says:

    I’ve never heard people even consider it was built by glaciers. To me that’s absurd as it’s obviously designed and there are similar structures around the world. I would perhaps consider Neanderthals’ involvement though. More needs to be known. Next they’ll say aliens built the pyramids. Nope, it’s us, the amazing intelligent human.