taylor swift fans

Around the world, Taylor Swift’s fan base skews female. (Credit: rblfmr on Shutterstock)

In a Nutshell

  • Taylor Swift is now politically polarizing. Democrats view her far more positively than Republicans, even after accounting for age, gender and other demographics.
  • A sharp Gen Z gender gap drives the divide. Young women admire Swift, while young men are significantly more negative. It’s a split that mirrors widening political differences among younger Americans.
  • Hostile sexism fuels Swift backlash. Negative views of Swift are strongly linked to beliefs that women have too much power or succeed at men’s expense, especially among Republican men.
  • Pop culture has become political identity. Swift’s reception shows how cultural tastes, once shared across parties, now function as partisan signals, shrinking common ground in American life.

Taylor Swift’s latest album, “The Life of a Showgirl,” generated a cultural whirlwind: chart-topping success, social media saturation and frenzied debate over her artistic evolution.

Nonetheless, despite this warm reception, opinions on Swift are deeply polarized by party. Democrats are far more likely to view her positively; Republicans are more likely to hold negative views. This partisan divide remains in place even after accounting for age, gender and other demographic differences.

We are political scientists who conduct research on public opinion. In our just-published study, “Mirrorball Politics,” we draw on national survey data to examine how Americans feel about Swift and what those feelings reveal about our politics. What we find is striking: Swift has become a cultural mirror, reflecting our society’s deepest social and political fault lines.

In other words, liking or disliking Swift has become yet another way Americans signal who they are politically. Young women love her, but young men don’t – and that gap matters.

This is part of a broader trend in which cultural preferences and political identity have collapsed into each other. The type of beer you drinkthe kind of car you drive, the stores you shop at and now the musical artists you admire have become markers of political belonging – and difference.

Popular entertainment used to be a common space where Americans, regardless of whether they were Republicans or Democrats, could come together and have some fun. Those shared spaces are shrinking – and with them the opportunity for connection across partisan divides.

The Swifties Gap

That’s why feelings toward Swift offer warning signs for the future of American politics.

One of the starkest divides we found is between young men and young women. Gen Z women – those born between 1997 and 2012 – admire Swift. Gen Z men, not so much. On a 100-point scale measuring attitudes toward Swift, young women averaged 55, while young men averaged 43 – a statistically significant difference that was not present among older Americans.

Taylor Swift at the 2013 American Music Awards
The scope of Taylor Swift’s success may have triggered a backlash among some Americans. (Kathy Hutchins/Shutterstock)

This gender gap mirrors the widening political divide among younger Americans that played a pivotal role in the 2024 presidential election. Although a modest gender gap has been a consistent, defining feature of American electoral politics since 1980, the gap among young Americans is huge.

Young women are markedly progressive in their politics. Young men, by contrast, are trending rightward.

Many young men express skepticism toward feminism, discomfort with shifts in gender norms and a growing attraction to more conservative cultural messaging.

Haters Gonna Hate

This yawning gender gap is also reflected in views regarding Swift.

The strongest predictor of negative views of the singer, aside from partisanship, is “hostile sexism.” This is defined as negative attitudes toward women and a sense that men should dominate.

Our study finds that individuals who believe that women’s achievements come at men’s expense, or that women have too much power, are far more likely to dislike Swift. This effect is especially strong among men and particularly among Republican men.

Swift’s enormous success, artistic autonomy and cultural influence appear to trigger anxieties about women’s power in public life. The backlash is not about her lyrics or her image. It’s about what she represents: a confident, self-directed woman at the center of American culture.

This dynamic reveals the broader challenges facing women in positions of authority, including in politics. Hostile sexism remains a force in American society and a formidable barrier for any woman aspiring to the presidency.

Swift As A Visible Symbol

Swift didn’t create these divisions – she is simply reflecting them back. But the intensity of the reaction to her success reveals how conflicted America remains about women’s power.

Our study also shows that people who scored high on hostile sexism were much more likely to hold negative views of Kamala Harris during the presidential election of 2024. This mirrors findings from earlier research showing that hostile sexism was one of the strongest reasons voters did not support Hillary Clinton in 2016.

That conflict is not abstract. It is shaping who we elect and whether women can lead without triggering backlash. As the United States marks its 250th anniversary as a democractic nation, we have yet to elect a woman as president, and women remain significantly underrepresented in high-level political positions.

Democracy depends on some measure of shared reality and common ground. When even pop stars become partisan litmus tests, that common ground keeps shrinking.


Laurel Elder, Professor of Political Science, Hartwick College.

Jeff Gulati, Professor of Sociology, Bentley University.

Mary-Kate Lizotte, Professor of Political Science, Augusta University.

Steven Greene, Professor of Political Science, North Carolina State University

The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

The Conversation

About The Conversation

The Conversation is a nonprofit news organization dedicated to unlocking the knowledge of academic experts for the public. The Conversation's team of 21 editors works with researchers to help them explain their work clearly and without jargon.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink

Editor-in-Chief

John Anderer

Associate Editor

Leave a Reply

2 Comments

  1. fsilber says:

    I used to hear the Top-40 hits on the radio when eating breakfast before school back around 1970. I don’t recall hearing any Taylor Swift songs, and all the headlines and magazine covers about her continue failing to bring back any memories of that. Likewise, with music videos on MTV in the 1980s playing at the pizza parlor while we ate — no matter how many headlines I see, I still don’t recall having seen any Taylor Swift music videos.

    How can I have an opinion about her as a singer when I have no idea what any of her songs sound like?

  2. IToldYou says:

    When entertainers started inserting their politics into their performances and professional identity, they isolate at least half of their potential reach. It’s bad for business. Ask Budweiser. Back in the day musicians and companies wanted everyone to listen and buy their product, but now they are just paid influencers for politicians. Not sorry for Swift, it’s her own fault.