
The movements involved in handwriting hold neurological meaning. (Credit: Karolina Grabowska from Pexels)
Rapidly becoming a lost art, handwriting engages the mind in ways typing simply can’t replicate.
In A Nutshell
- Handwriting activates more of the brain than typing. Writing by hand engages regions tied to memory, motor control, sensory feedback, and language processing. Typing activates fewer areas and produces what researchers call “more passive cognitive engagement.”
- People remember information better when they write it by hand. Multiple studies found that handwriting leads to stronger memory retention and faster recall than typing, likely because the slower, more effortful process forces deeper engagement with the material.
- The physical act of forming letters matters. Handwriting creates a direct link between movement and meaning, with each letter requiring a unique sequence of strokes. Typing uses the same finger motion for every character, weakening this motor-symbol connection.
- Handwriting may help keep the aging brain active. The cognitive demands of writing by hand could stimulate neuroplasticity, though researchers stop short of claiming it prevents decline. For older adults, regular handwriting offers.a low-cost way to engage multiple brain systems at once.
For anyone looking to keep their mind sharp with age, science offers an unexpectedly low-tech suggestion: pick up a pen.
A review of brain imaging studies found that handwriting activates a broader network of brain regions than typing, engaging areas tied to memory, sensory processing, and motor coordination. The findings carry particular weight for older adults, since the cognitive demands of handwriting may help stimulate neuroplasticity, the brain’s ability to form new connections and adapt over time.
The review, led by psychiatrist Giuseppe Marano at the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart in Rome, synthesized 30 studies using technologies like functional MRI and high-density EEG to compare brain activity during handwriting and typing. The pattern that emerged was consistent: writing by hand forces the brain to work harder, coordinating fine motor skills, processing tactile feedback from the pen and paper, and maintaining spatial awareness of each letter’s formation. Typing, by contrast, involves repetitive finger movements that require far less cognitive effort.
That difference in mental workload may matter for long-term brain health.
How Handwriting Engages More of the Brain
The brain’s plasticity fluctuates across the lifespan. In childhood, neural circuits are highly flexible, allowing for rapid learning and adaptation. In adulthood, the brain becomes more structurally stable, making the acquisition of new skills more difficult. But research has consistently shown that cognitively demanding activities can help maintain brain function and potentially slow age-related decline.
Handwriting appears to fit that description. The review, published in Life, notes that writing by hand engages the sensorimotor cortex for tactile feedback, the visual word form area for letter recognition, the superior parietal lobule for spatial processing, and language centers including Broca’s area. Typing activates fewer of these regions and produces what the researchers describe as “more passive cognitive engagement.”
One study using high-density EEG on 36 young adults found that handwriting triggered theta and alpha brain wave oscillations, patterns associated with learning and memory consolidation. These patterns were stronger during handwriting and much weaker during typing. Different parts of the brain activated during handwriting also communicated with each other through these brain waves, pointing to a level of neural integration that typing does not produce.
The researchers hypothesize that increased reliance on keyboards “may reduce activation in neural circuits involved in learning and memory consolidation.” Handwriting, which requires greater motor and cognitive engagement, “may confer long-term benefits for brain function preservation.”

The Link Between Writing by Hand and Better Memory
The connection between handwriting and memory has been documented across multiple studies in the review. People consistently remember information better when they write it by hand compared with when they type it.
A study by Longcamp and colleagues found that participants who wrote unfamiliar characters by hand demonstrated better memory retention and faster recall than those who typed the same characters. The researchers attributed this to the greater cognitive load involved in handwriting, which forced deeper processing of the information being encoded.
Another line of research examined students taking notes in classrooms. Those who wrote by hand retained conceptual material better than those who typed, even when the analysis controlled for typing speed. Typing tends to encourage near-verbatim transcription, a relatively passive process. Handwriting is too slow for that approach, requiring the writer to paraphrase and actively engage with the content.
For older adults concerned about memory, these findings point toward a simple activity that may help. Keeping a handwritten journal, writing letters to friends and family, or taking notes by hand during lectures or presentations may provide cognitive benefits that typing cannot replicate.
The review’s authors also see therapeutic potential. Handwriting’s engagement with sensorimotor, cognitive, and memory-related networks makes it a candidate for cognitive rehabilitation in individuals with neurological conditions such as stroke, traumatic brain injury, or neurodegenerative diseases. Digital technologies that simulate handwriting, such as stylus-based tablets, could provide similar benefits for patients with limited mobility while accommodating physical limitations.
Why Pen and Paper Activate the Brain Differently Than Keyboards
The physical nature of handwriting appears central to its cognitive effects. When writing with a pen, the brain receives concurrent motor and sensory feedback. The fingers feel the resistance of the pen against paper. Each letter requires a unique sequence of movements that directly corresponds to its shape. An “A” is formed through entirely different strokes than a “B.”
Typing weakens this connection between movement and meaning. Pressing a key is a uniform action regardless of which letter appears on screen. The same finger motion can produce any character, eliminating the motor learning that handwriting reinforces.
The review describes handwriting as establishing “a direct and exclusive relationship between the writer’s motor action and the resulting graphic output, involving a full-body and sensory experience.” This multisensory integration underlies the memory advantages observed across studies.
There is also an attentional component. Handwriting focuses attention on a single point in space, the pen tip meeting paper, and unfolds slowly enough to allow for deliberate thought. Typing divides attention between the keyboard and the screen while proceeding at a speed that may outpace reflection.
What This Means for Cognitive Health
The review stops short of prescribing specific handwriting activities for cognitive health. But its synthesis of existing evidence points toward several practical considerations.
For individuals looking to maintain cognitive function, incorporating regular handwriting into daily routines may offer benefits beyond what typing provides. This could take the form of journaling, writing grocery lists by hand rather than using smartphone apps, or drafting early versions of documents on paper before moving to a keyboard.
For caregivers of older adults experiencing early cognitive changes, handwriting exercises might serve as a low-cost supplement to other activities. The motor and cognitive demands of forming letters could help keep neural pathways active that might otherwise weaken with disuse.
The researchers acknowledge that typing offers advantages in speed and efficiency that handwriting cannot match. For many tasks, keyboards remain the practical choice. But in a society that has largely abandoned penmanship, the accumulated neuroscience evidence points to something valuable that may have been lost.
Putting pen to paper, it turns out, may be one of the simplest ways to keep the brain engaged.
Disclaimer: This article summarizes findings from a peer-reviewed scientific review and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice. The research discussed examines brain activation patterns during handwriting and typing but does not establish that handwriting prevents or treats cognitive decline. Individuals with concerns about memory or cognitive health should consult a qualified healthcare provider.
Paper Summary
Limitations
The review focused exclusively on adult participants, since the developing brain in children and adolescents does not reach its definitive state until around age 24. Conflicting findings across individual studies likely stem from differences in experimental design, participant populations, and imaging methodologies. Some studies examined native speakers of alphabetic languages like English or French, while others examined speakers of logographic languages like Japanese, which may engage different neural pathways. Technological familiarity also plays a role, meaning results could differ between experienced typists and novices. The distinction between traditional pen-and-paper handwriting and stylus-based writing on digital tablets was not consistently addressed across the studies reviewed, even though these methods differ in haptic feedback and motor execution.
Funding and Disclosures
The research received no external funding. All authors declared no conflicts of interest. The authors expressed gratitude to Fondazione Luigi Einaudi for supporting the dissemination of their findings.
Publication Details
The review was authored by Giuseppe Marano and colleagues at the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS and the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart in Rome, along with collaborators from Fondazione Luigi Einaudi, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, and other Italian institutions. The paper was published in Life (MDPI), Volume 15, Issue 3, Article 345, on February 22, 2025. The academic editor was Paolo Taurisano. DOI: 10.3390/life15030345.








Great article, and confirmation of an incredible aspect of written composition I’ve noticed and been intrigued by for some time (72 now). As I noted to a friend I shared this article with…
“Since the 70s and 80s I’ve been aware of the distinction between handwriting and typewriting, especially since that was one of my most creative writing periods, when I maintained a substantial journal and had several handwritten correspondences going on. I’ve been cognizant of all of the elements noted in the article, and can add one more. When handwriting I’m aware that the words on paper are the result of an internal conversation I’m having with myself, when I am both antagonist and protagonist of the topic. Both sides of that exchange are imbedded in the hard copy, a 3D dialogue (pro/con/results) that feels like wringing out a saturated sponge, expressing the mix absorbed from passing my brain and creativity over the mess lying about me. Metaphors aside, my spirit breathes differently, more deeply and completely, when I have a pen or pencil in hand – and I even use these mechanical means differently when in certain states of mind. Writing itself, and the ideas that drive me to capture the words, are two separate processes, with two separate epiphanies.”
In the 80s I explored composition more deeply by hand copying complete passages from some of my favorite books (Brothers Karamazov, 100 Years of Solitude, JL Borges). Almost immediately I could sense/feel the various strategies the different authors may have been experiencing as they composed, even to the point of considering options for specific words already on the page. It was as if I briefly and distantly entered each unique author’s active creative process.
I also just watched an interview with Borges where he said his preference for composing in English was because English is comprised of root languages from Germanic and Latin/Romance sources and traditions, so that not-quite-similar words (regal/kingly, or holy ghost/holy spirit) provide a subtlety of options for composition and meaning. For me, that gentle awareness is at the heart of the creative process that I’ve come to enjoy even more than actually completing a piece.
Thank you, Jim