(© dang - stock.adobe.com)
In A Nutshell
- As cells age, they deliberately shrink a major internal structure called the endoplasmic reticulum.
- This downsizing happens early in adulthood and shifts cells away from protein production toward fat metabolism.
- Long-lived animals remodel this structure sooner, not later.
- Blocking this process erases many lifespan benefits in lab models.
Aging cells stage a dramatic renovation project. Within the first three days of reaching adulthood, they start dismantling up to 70% of one of their most important internal structures. Scientists just discovered this isn’t a breakdown, it’s a survival tactic that might hold clues to living longer.
The target is the endoplasmic reticulum, a membrane network folded throughout every cell that acts as a combination factory floor and shipping department. It builds proteins, manufactures fats, and coordinates communication between different parts of the cell. Researchers at Vanderbilt University watched this structure shrink across the lifespans of worms, yeast, and in limited mouse brain samples. They saw a pattern: as animals age, their cells deliberately tear down large portions of this organelle and fundamentally change what’s left.
The findings, published in Nature Cell Biology, complicate assumptions about cellular aging. Animals engineered to live longer don’t preserve their endoplasmic reticulum, they accelerate its downsizing. And when scientists blocked this demolition process, they also blocked some of the lifespan benefits of anti-aging interventions. The cells aren’t falling apart. They’re adapting.
A Factory Retooling Itself
The endoplasmic reticulum comes in two basic forms. Rough ER looks like stacked sheets covered in ribosomes, molecular machines that churn out proteins. Smooth ER, meanwhile, forms tubular networks that handle fat production and talk to other parts of the cell. Young cells pack in the rough ER. They’re protein factories running at full capacity.
Eventually, however, everything changes.
The research team tracked fluorescent markers in roundworms throughout their lives. By the time worms hit middle age (about a week for these short-lived creatures), their rough ER had largely vanished. What remained were sparse networks of tubular ER. The transformation happened fast: most of the change occurred within the first three days of adulthood.
The same pattern appeared in aging yeast and in brain neurons from 18-month-old mice. When the team looked at databases cataloging which proteins increase or decrease with age, they found the molecular signature matched what they were seeing under the microscope: proteins involved in building and quality-checking other proteins declined sharply, while enzymes for fat metabolism held steady or increased.
The cells weren’t just shrinking their ER. They were changing its job description from protein manufacturing to fat management.
Cells Deliberately Eat Their Own Structures
What’s causing this transformation? Cells possess a self-cleaning system called autophagy (literally “self-eating”) where they package up damaged or unnecessary components and break them down for parts. A specialized version called ER-phagy specifically targets the endoplasmic reticulum.
When researchers blocked the genes controlling this process, the age-related ER remodeling stopped. Worms that couldn’t perform ER-phagy kept their endoplasmic reticulum at youthful levels even as they aged. Using fluorescent markers that survive digestion, the scientists watched ER material accumulating inside the cellular recycling centers of aging animals, confirming that cells actively route parts of their ER for demolition.
Interestingly, the study identified tissue-specific differences, at least in worms. Skin-like cells rely on one protein pathway, while intestinal cells use a completely different system tied to the cellular stress response. In other words, cells across different tissues coordinate this downsizing operation through multiple independent pathways, suggesting it serves an important function.
The Longevity Connection
If losing ER represented damage accumulation, animals that live longer should preserve their ER better. They don’t.
The team tested four different ways to extend lifespan in worms: reducing growth signals, removing reproductive tissues, and directly dialing down protein production. Every intervention triggered dramatic ER remodeling: but it happened in young adults, before normal worms showed any changes. Long-lived animals looked like they’d fast-forwarded through the usual aging process, at least when it came to their ER.
This pattern suggested ER downsizing might actively contribute to longevity rather than just accompanying it. To test this, researchers blocked ER-phagy in long-lived animals. In yeast, preventing ER-phagy completely eliminated the lifespan extension from an anti-aging drug. In worms, blocking the process in multiple tissues at once largely erased the longevity benefits of reduced growth signaling.
The cells need to remodel their ER to achieve the lifespan gains seen in these models.
Why Demolition Might Be Good
The findings point to a model where cells proactively adjust their infrastructure to match changing demands. Protein production declines broadly during aging, a change that’s been documented for years but often interpreted as dysfunction. Maybe it’s not. If cells are making fewer proteins, maintaining massive protein-production facilities becomes wasteful and potentially risky. Unused machinery can malfunction.
By dismantling excess capacity early, cells might prevent problems before they start. The shift toward fat metabolism could reflect changing energy needs or help manage the fat accumulation that typically increases with age. The tissue-specific control the researchers identified suggests cells tailor the response to local conditions: skin cells monitoring collagen production, intestinal cells responding to stress signals.
There are almost certainly trade-offs. The ER coordinates many cellular processes beyond protein production. It helps build the structures that clean up cellular debris, repairs damaged compartments, and regulates energy-producing mitochondria. Constraining it early could compromise these functions later, potentially contributing to late-life decline even while providing benefits upfront.
Still, in the short term, the strategy appears to work. Animals that remodel their ER early live longer.
What It Means for Us
The study focused on worms, yeast, and limited mouse tissue, so direct conclusions about human aging require caution. But the underlying biology appears highly conserved. Humans have the same autophagy genes, similar ER-phagy machinery, and equivalent cellular stress-response systems.
The findings also connect to human disease. Genetic mutations affecting ER shape cause neurodegenerative conditions like hereditary spastic paraplegia. Problems with ER function link to metabolic disorders. Understanding how cells naturally manage ER through aging might eventually suggest new approaches to these conditions.
More broadly, the work positions cellular architecture as an underappreciated lever in aging. Much research focuses on accumulating damage: broken proteins, mutated DNA, exhausted stem cells. This study highlights proactive remodeling: cells changing their structure and function in anticipation of shifting demands. That distinction matters for developing interventions. Fixing damage and optimizing adaptation require different strategies.
The massive downsizing operation happening inside aging cells turns out to be less about decay and more about renovation, like an attempt to match form to function as circumstances change. Whether we can harness this process to stay healthier longer remains an open question, but at least now we know to look.
Disclaimer: This article is for general information only. The research described was conducted in laboratory organisms, and its findings have not been shown to extend human lifespan or prevent disease.
Paper Notes
Limitations
The study relied primarily on model organisms (C. elegans, yeast, and limited mouse tissue), requiring caution when extrapolating to human aging. Mouse data came from relatively young animals (18 months) examining only brain neurons rather than diverse tissues or advanced ages. While protein databases suggested similar functional shifts in mammalian tissues, direct visualization of ER remodeling during mammalian aging remained limited. The mechanisms identified in worms require validation in mammalian systems. The study focused on normal aging and specific longevity interventions, leaving open whether ER-phagy plays similar roles in other contexts affecting lifespan. The research demonstrated ER-phagy necessity for certain longevity paradigms but did not establish whether enhancing ER-phagy alone extends lifespan sufficiently.
Funding and Disclosures
This work received support from multiple National Institutes of Health grants including NIA F31AG076290, NIGMS T32GM007347, NIGMS T32GM152286, NIGMS R35GM155303, NIGMS R35GM144112, NIA R00AG052666, and NIA R01AG073354. Additional funding came from the Glenn Foundation for Medical Research/American Federation for Aging Research. The authors declared no competing interests. Shared resources used in the study received support from additional NIH grants and institutional funds including the Washington University Center for Cellular Imaging, Vanderbilt Cell Imaging Shared Resource, and facilities at the University of California San Diego.
Publication Details
Authors: Eric K. F. Donahue, Nathaniel L. Hepowit, Elizabeth M. Ruark, Alexandra G. Mulligan, Brennen Keuchel, Nicholas D. Urban, Li Peng, Stedman Stephens, Derek J. Johnson, Natalie S. Wallace, Lauren P. Jackson, Mark H. Ellisman, Rafael Arrojo e Drigo, Andrew W. Folkmann, Matthias C. Truttmann, Jason A. MacGurn, and Kristopher Burkewitz | Journal: Nature Cell Biology | Title: ER remodelling is a feature of ageing and depends on ER-phagy | DOI: 10.1038/s41556-025-01860-1 | Affiliations: Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine; Department of Molecular & Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan; Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine; Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University; National Center for Microscopy and Imaging Research, University of California San Diego; Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine | Publication Date: Published online February 2, 2026; Received December 16, 2024; Accepted December 15, 2025







