Connect with us

Thrive

St. Pete advances Gas Plant proposal process

St. Petersburg has triggered a state law that requires public notice before disposing of property in a community redevelopment area.

Mark Parker

Published

on

The former Black community is home to Tropicana Field and a sea of surface parking lots. Photo by Mark Parker.

Mayor Ken Welch told the Catalyst in May that St. Petersburg would prioritize creating affordable senior housing around Tropicana Field. That is the sole focus of a redevelopment proposal submitted Oct. 8.

The Pinellas County Housing Authority (PCHA) hopes to construct an 80-unit facility for low-income seniors, particularly those who once lived in the Historic Gas Plant District, at 1659 3rd Ave. S. The site is currently a city-owned parking lot used for Tampa Bay Rays games. 

However, the city referenced a $6.8 billion plan, submitted Oct. 3 by Ark Ellison Horus, when announcing its intention to welcome additional proposals. Officials said Tuesday that they will open a 30-day window for “alternative or competing proposals” in mid-November, as required by state law when selling property in a community redevelopment area. 

“I intend to ensure that any redevelopment reflects the values and priorities of our entire community- honoring our history while creating pathways for inclusive progress and a thriving future for all in our city,” Welch said in a prepared statement. 

Many insiders believed the public notice was imminent after ARK Ellison Horus submitted its offer Oct. 3. The city’s announcement states that it is “in receipt of an unsolicited proposal to redevelop the approximately 86 acres of property in the Historic Gas Plant District.”

Florida Statute 163.380  requires the 30 day period for competing proposals if the City plans to dispose of some or all of a property, indicating administrators think enough of the Ark Ellison Horus proposal to begin that process. 

Council Chair Copley Gerdes previously said that Ark Ellison Horus “checked a lot of boxes.” He noted that the city “continues to attract great talent to a site that we know can be something very special.” 

PCHA’s team includes St. Petersburg-based Ascension Real Estate Partners and Storyn Studio for Architecture, a key member of the previous Rays and Hines development team. The group believes its proposal “represents a unique opportunity to transform a currently underutilized parcel into a community asset that addresses a pressing need for affordable senior housing in St. Petersburg, while honoring the city’s commitment to the Historic Gas Plant Community.” 

Welch has also prioritized building a new Woodson African American Museum of Florida. Black-owned Storyn Studio has continued to work with the institution’s leadership after the Rays exited an arduously negotiated stadium deal in March. 

Neil Brickfield, executive director of the PCHA, noted that Story Studio initially conceptualized the proposed project when part of the Rays and Hines development team. “They’re an awesome architect and firm, and it was a natural fit to join up with them,” he said. 

Brickfield said his group, which suggested a $1 purchase price to create “deeply affordable” senior housing at the .58-acre site, was already working on its proposal when Ark Ellison Horus broached a partnership with the Pinellas and St. Petersburg Housing Authorities. The agencies would oversee the “much bigger” project’s affordable housing. 

“We let them know right away that we had a potential conflict and that we intended to go ahead with this,” Brickfield added. “Nobody in those discussions thought that would preclude us from anything else. Everybody was aware of what’s going on, and we still intend to be involved in whatever the City of St. Petersburg decides.” 

Ark Ellison Horus said in a prepared statement Tuesday that the team “is aware of the proposal submitted by the Pinellas County Housing Authority and plans to thoroughly review it, to better understand what the plan entails.” 

The city could potentially select both proposals. Its announcement stated that interested parties could lease, purchase or develop “all or a portion of the Historic Gas Plant District property.” 

The city council recently agreed to discuss hiring the Urban Land Institute, the world’s oldest and largest network of land-use experts, to study the site. Councilmember Brandi Gabbard said the report would help determine if “it’s even right to go with a master plan developer.” 

“Honoring the promises made to our community, including the residents of the Historic Gas Plant District, has been a top priority of my administration, and we continue to explore ways to pursue impactful outcomes that reflect the needs and aspirations of our residents,” Welch said Tuesday. 

Brickfield believes his proposal will help accomplish those goals. He noted that PCHA’s mission is to provide quality affordable housing and improve the lives of residents, “and that’s what we intend to do.” 

The agency already houses approximately 2,500 low-income seniors, those earning less than 80% of the area median income. Brickfield thought the Gas Plant provided a “great opportunity to be in downtown St. Pete” and a “great way to fulfill the city’s desires.” 

“I think the vision of affordable housing that has a preference for Historic Gas Plant residents is a wonderful vision,” Brickfield continued. “And I think the Ark Ellison Horus vision is a fantastic vision for the City of St. Petersburg.” 

6 Comments

6 Comments

  1. Avatar

    Ryan Todd

    October 22, 2025at8:39 pm

    Our city government is too incompetent to execute a master plan. Best course of action is to adopt a form-based code for the site and ai room off the land parcel by parcel.

  2. Avatar

    John Donovan

    October 22, 2025at7:36 pm

    Kolter group has asked for 90 days which is reasonable. It would be municipal malpractice to not offer at least a 90 day window.

  3. Avatar

    HAL FREEDMAN

    October 22, 2025at5:37 pm

    Pete and Alan both make sense. Take your time on 86 acres of prime development land. Do it right this time. Sorry of it can’t be done before we have a new administration.

  4. Avatar

    Alan DeLisle

    October 22, 2025at11:56 am

    Let the farce begin again.

    Using the 30 day notice means Welch has already decided. Would you ever use a 30 day notice time period on one of the best development sites in the country. Of course not, unless you want to keep competition away. Who can put together a competitive proposal on the Trop in 30 days? No one. This deal is cooked. I remember the Welch administration saying they would never use the 30 notice process. How things change.

    Welch is once again chasing money and backing before the election. Be smart St Pete. Council and private sector please do a much better job this time. Don’t bow to perceived power.

    Proposers should at least have 90 days to be competitive and then you enhance city leverage in getting a better deal for the city. Losing leverage/picking a developer too early is why Welch lost everything in the last effort. It’s not about checking boxes, as Gerdes would say. It’s about resolving development agreement details to the city’s advantage throughout the process.

    Don’t make a decision until these details are worked out. A developer’s plan doesn’t mean much. So much for any value created by another city planning effort. A farce. Be strong St Pete.

    • Avatar

      Pete Boland

      October 22, 2025at3:26 pm

      Actually agree. Farce is a good word for a 30 day bid process.

      But as you know all too well, just because a deal is made, doesn’t mean a deal is done. KW may not be mayor 14 months from now and a new process could begin. We need to carve this thing up into smaller parcels & land bank some of it. A master development sounds too audacious and too risky at this juncture, especially if you’re losing pro sports.

      • Avatar

        Steve Sullivan

        October 24, 2025at5:15 pm

        Alan, how is Louisville doing?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

We appreciate your taking the time to share your perspective. Note: Catalyst and Cityverse are non-anonymous platforms. Please include your full first and full last name, as well as your email when commenting (your email address will not be published). Comments without these elements will not be published. Comments are held for moderation per our posting guidelines - please read them.

By posting a comment, I have read, understand and agree to the Posting Guidelines.


The St. Pete Catalyst

The Catalyst honors its name by aggregating & curating the sparks that propel the St Pete engine.  It is a modern news platform, powered by community sourced content and augmented with directed coverage.  Bring your news, your perspective and your spark to the St Pete Catalyst and take your seat at the table.

Email us: spark@stpetecatalyst.com

Subscribe for Free

Subscription Form

Privacy Policy | Copyright © 2025 St Pete Catalyst

Share with friend

Enter the details of the person you want to share this article with.