2

I have a Student class in my console application like this :

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;

namespace ConsoleApp1
{
    public class Student
    {
        public Student(Student student)
        {
            StudentId = student.StudentId;
            FullName = student.FullName;
        }

        public int StudentId { get; set; }
        public string FullName { get; set; }
        
    }
}

It has a copy constructor in its body and when I want to instantiate it in the Program class like this:

Student student = new Student();

I will have an error that

"There is no argument given that corresponds to the required formal parameter 'student' of 'Student.Student(Student)'"

When I can not instantiate my Student class how could I pass the argument of Student to its constructor ?

I want to instantiate my Student class but I've got the error on it that I described.

8
  • Have you looked at constructor overloading already? Commented May 12, 2024 at 18:28
  • 2
    You did not define a default constructor (one that gets no arguments), so new Student() cannot work. What do you expect the Student fields to hold in this case ? Commented May 12, 2024 at 18:31
  • 1
    In C#, classes do have an implicit default constructor, unless you define a constructor yourself (which you did), then you also have to define the default (parameterless) constructor explicitly. Commented May 12, 2024 at 18:32
  • 1
    You mean that I have to add another constructor to my Student class ? Commented May 12, 2024 at 18:32
  • Yes, a default one (without parameters). And you should probably set the fields to some meaninful default value in it. Commented May 12, 2024 at 18:32

3 Answers 3

3

You mention that you would like to use a copy constructor to create a new Student.

This requires you to have an existing Student instance to copy from.

Moreover - as long as you only have a copy constructor you will never be able to create such an instance (because the implicit default constructor will no longer be available).

The solution is to add a constructor - either a default one (without parameters), or one that requires e.g. an int and a String and initializes the fields of the new instance:

// Default constructor:
public Student()
{
   StudentId = -1;        // some default ID
   FullName = "SomeName"; // some default name
}

Or:

// Constructor with parameters:
public Student(int id, String name)
{
   StudentId = id;
   FullName = name;
}

(or even both).
Note that if you use the default constructor you should probably set the fields to proper values afterwards.

Only after creating an instance with such a constructor you can use your copy constructor:

// Create a default instance and then set the fields:
Student studentToCopyFrom = new Student();
studentToCopyFrom.StudentId  = 111;
studentToCopyFrom.FullName = "Joe";
// Or create an instance with arguments for the fields:
Student studentToCopyFrom = new Student(111, "Joe");

// Now create a new instance with the copy constructor:
Student student = new Student(studentToCopyFrom);
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

Comments

1

As soon as you wrote some kind of constructor - in your case the copy constructor, then the default constructor is deleted, And so when you do: Student student = new Student(); It has no empty constructor to refer to. Your solution is to simply create a default constructor that initializes the parameters with the default you choose

public Student()
    {
        StudentId = 0;//for example
        FullName = "Jhon Doe";//for example
    }

Comments

1

If you need a copy-constructor, use a record type, which already has one by default:

public record class Student(int StudentId, string FullName);

Usage example:

var student2 = student1 with { StudentId = 42 };

5 Comments

As far as I know a proper copy-constructor is one that accepts an exitsing instance to copy from (not the value for the fields). See here.
@wohlstad Yes, and records have an implicit one, so you could basically just do var student2 = student1 with {} to create a 1:1 copy (also there is no real benefit in doing that, if the type is immutable)
I see. Good to know. As for the benefit - the OP asked for it specifically, I assumed for educational purposes, and so I answered accordingly.
@wohlstad I figured the point that confused them was that they couldn't use the default constructor anymore, that's what I addressed in my comment. The info about records is just in addition to the other answers.
You might be right. I added an explicit note about that to my answer to clear up any confusion of the sort you mentioned.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.