Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 14;55(5):554-563.
doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agaa048.

Why Is Per Capita Consumption Underestimated in Alcohol Surveys? Results from 39 Surveys in 23 European Countries

Affiliations

Why Is Per Capita Consumption Underestimated in Alcohol Surveys? Results from 39 Surveys in 23 European Countries

Carolin Kilian et al. Alcohol Alcohol. .

Abstract

Aims: The aims of the article are (a) to estimate coverage rates (i.e. the proportion of 'real consumption' accounted for by a survey compared with more reliable aggregate consumption data) of the total, the recorded and the beverage-specific annual per capita consumption in 23 European countries, and (b) to investigate differences between regions, and other factors which might be associated with low coverage (prevalence of heavy episodic drinking [HED], survey methodology).

Methods: Survey data were derived from the Standardised European Alcohol Survey and Harmonising Alcohol-related Measures in European Surveys (number of surveys: 39, years of survey: 2008-2015, adults aged 20-64 years). Coverage rates were calculated at the aggregated level by dividing consumption estimates derived from the surveys by alcohol per capita estimates from a recent global modelling study. Fractional response regression models were used to examine the relative importance of the predictors.

Results: Large variation in coverage across European countries was observed (average total coverage: 36.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] [33.2; 39.8]), with lowest coverage found for spirits consumption (26.3, 95% CI [21.4; 31.3]). Regarding the second aim, the prevalence of HED was associated with wine- and spirits-specific coverage, explaining 10% in the respective variance. However, neither the consideration of regions nor survey methodology explained much of the variance in coverage estimates, regardless of the scenario.

Conclusion: The results reiterate that alcohol survey data should not be used to compare or estimate aggregate consumption levels, which may be better reflected by statistics on recorded or total per capita consumption.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Coverage rates for total alcohol consumption by country. Alcohol consumption coverage rates referring to total alcohol consumption are presented separately for the RARHA SEAS (red) and the RARHA HARMES surveys (orange), ordered by country. Most recent survey was used if multiple surveys were included in RARHA HARMES (Denmark 2013, Iceland 2013); coverage rates for England 2013 and Scotland 2013 were averaged (UK 2013). UK = United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; RARHA = Joint Action on Reducing Alcohol-Related Harm; SEAS = Standardised European Alcohol Survey; HARMES = Harmonising Alcohol-related Measures in European Surveys.

References

    1. Davis C, Thake J, Vilhena N (2010) Social desirability biases in self-reported alcohol consumption and harms. Addict Behav 35:302–11. - PubMed
    1. Dawson D. (1998) Volume of ethanol consumption: effects of different approaches to measurement. J Stud Alcohol 59:191–7. - PubMed
    1. Ekholm O. (2004) Influence of the recall period on self-reported alcohol intake. Eur J Clin Nutr 58:60–3. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601746. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ekholm O, Strandberg-Larsen K, Grønbæk M (2011) Influence of the recall period on a beverage-specific weekly drinking measure for alcohol intake. Eur J Clin Nutr 65:520–5. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2011.1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gmel G, Rehm J (2004) Measuring alcohol consumption. Contemp Drug Probl 31:467–540.