Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct;27(e2):e136-e142.
doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053972. Epub 2017 Dec 16.

Negative affect, message reactance and perceived risk: how do pictorial cigarette pack warnings change quit intentions?

Affiliations

Negative affect, message reactance and perceived risk: how do pictorial cigarette pack warnings change quit intentions?

Marissa G Hall et al. Tob Control. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: Pictorial warnings on cigarette packs increase motivation to quit smoking. We sought to examine the potential mediating role of negative affect, message reactance (ie, an oppositional reaction to a message) and perceived risk in shaping quit intentions.

Methods: In 2014 and 2015, we randomly assigned 2149 adult US smokers to receive either pictorial warnings or text-only warnings applied to their cigarette packs for 4 weeks. Analyses used structural equation modelling with bootstrapped SEs to test our theorised mediational model.

Findings: Pictorial warnings increased negative affect, message reactance and quit intentions (all P<0.001), but not perceived risk (ie, perceived likelihood and severity of harms of smoking). Negative affect mediated the impact of pictorial warnings on quit intentions (mediated effect=0.16, P<0.001). Message reactance weakened the impact of pictorial warnings on quit intentions, although the effect was small (mediated effect=-0.04, P<0.001). Although pictorial warnings did not directly influence perceived risk, the model showed additional small mediation effects on quit intentions through negative affect and its positive association with perceived risk (mediated effect=0.02, P<0.001), as well as reactance and its negative association with perceived risk (mediated effect=-0.01, P<0.001).

Conclusions: Pictorial cigarette pack warnings increased quit intentions by increasing negative affect. Message reactance partially attenuated this increase in intentions. The opposing associations of negative affect and reactance on perceived risk may explain why pictorial warnings did not lead to observable changes in perceived risk.

Keywords: cessation; packaging and labelling; public policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: NTB and KMR have served as paid expert consultants in litigation against tobacco companies.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intervention warnings (left) and control warnings (right)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Structural equation model assessing the impact of pictorial warnings on quit intentions (n=2,149) Note. To simplify presentation, the figure omits factor loadings, non-significant pathways, and residuals. RMSEA=.038 [90% CI=.034, .041], CFI=.997, TLI=.997. *p<.05

References

    1. World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2013: Enforcing bans on tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2013.
    1. World Health Organization. Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. 2013
    1. Brewer NT, Hall MG, Noar SM, et al. Effect of pictorial cigarette pack warnings on changes in smoking behavior: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(7):905–912. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Noar SM, Hall MG, Francis DB, et al. Pictorial cigarette pack warnings: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Tob Control. 2016;25(3):341–354. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Noar SM, Francis DB, Bridges C, et al. The impact of strengthening cigarette pack warnings: Systematic review of longitudinal observational studies. Soc Sci Med. 2016;164:118–129. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types