Online Recruitment: Feasibility, Cost, and Representativeness in a Study of Postpartum Women
- PMID: 28274906
- PMCID: PMC5362693
- DOI: 10.2196/jmir.5745
Online Recruitment: Feasibility, Cost, and Representativeness in a Study of Postpartum Women
Abstract
Background: Online recruitment is feasible, low-cost, and can provide high-quality epidemiological data. However, little is known about the feasibility of recruiting postpartum women online, or sample representativeness.
Objective: The current study investigates the feasibility of recruiting a population of postpartum women online for health research and examines sample representativeness.
Methods: Two samples of postpartum women were compared: those recruited online as participants in a brief survey of new mothers (n=1083) and those recruited face-to-face as part of a nationally representative study (n=579). Sociodemographic, general health, and mental health characteristics were compared between the two samples.
Results: Obtaining a sample of postpartum women online for health research was highly efficient and low-cost. The online sample over-represented those who were younger (aged 25-29 years), were in a de facto relationship, had higher levels of education, spoke only English at home, and were first-time mothers. Members of the online sample were significantly more likely to have poor self-rated health and poor mental health than the nationally representative sample. Health differences remained after adjusting for sociodemographic differences.
Conclusions: Potential exists for feasible and low-cost e-epidemiological research with postpartum populations; however, researchers should consider the potential influence of sample nonrepresentativeness.
Keywords: Internet; feasibility; online; postpartum; recruitment; representativeness.
©Liana S Leach, Peter Butterworth, Carmel Poyser, Philip J Batterham, Louise M Farrer. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 08.03.2017.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
References
-
- Fenner Y, Garland SM, Moore EE, Jayasinghe Y, Fletcher A, Tabrizi SN, Gunasekaran B, Wark JD. Web-based recruiting for health research using a social networking site: an exploratory study. J Med Internet Res. 2012 Feb 01;14(1):e20. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1978. http://www.jmir.org/2012/1/e20/ v14i1e20 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Andreeva V, Galan P, Julia C, Castetbon K, Kesse-Guyot E, Hercberg S. Assessment of response consistency and respective participant profiles in the Internet-based NutriNet-Santé Cohort. Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Apr 01;179(7):910–6. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt431. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/24521560 kwt431 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Konstan JA, Rosser BR, Ross MW, Stanton J, Edwards WM. The story of subject naught: a cautionary but optimistic tale of Internet survey research. J Comput Mediat Commun. 2005;10(2):A–00. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00248.x. - DOI
-
- Hatch EE, Hahn KA, Wise LA, Mikkelsen EM, Kumar R, Fox MP, Brooks DR, Riis AH, Sorensen HT, Rothman KJ. Evaluation of selection bias in an Internet-based study of pregnancy planners. Epidemiology. 2016 Jan;27(1):98–104. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000400. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26484423 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
