Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun;47(7):622-631.
doi: 10.1111/hepr.12781. Epub 2016 Sep 18.

Effect of resistance training on liver fat and visceral adiposity in adults with obesity: A randomized controlled trial

Affiliations

Effect of resistance training on liver fat and visceral adiposity in adults with obesity: A randomized controlled trial

Shelley E Keating et al. Hepatol Res. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Aim: Regular aerobic exercise reduces visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and liver fat, however, not all individuals are able to adopt and adhere to such programs. Progressive resistance training (PRT) may be an alternative therapy, but there is limited available evidence. We examined the efficacy of PRT as per current exercise guidelines, compared with sham exercise placebo on liver fat and VAT.

Methods: Twenty-nine inactive and overweight/obese (body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 ) adults (age 29-59) were randomized to receive 8 weeks of PRT (n = 15, 10 exercises per session, 8-12 repetitions, 2-3 sets per exercise at 80-85% of one-repetition maximum, 3 days per week) or a sham exercise placebo control (CON) (n = 14). Change in liver fat, VAT, and abdominal s.c. adipose tissue (SAT) were assessed by magnetic resonance spectroscopy and imaging).

Results: There were no significant group by time interactions for change in liver fat in PRT versus CON groups (-0.07 ± 0.31% vs. 0.55 ± 0.77%, respectively, P = 0.19), VAT (-175 ± 85 cm3 vs. 10 ± 64 cm3 , respectively, P = 0.11), or abdominal SAT (-436 ± 245 cm3 vs. 127.29 ± 182 cm3 , respectively, P = 0.10) despite a significant increase in muscle volume (55 ± 78 cm3 vs. -0.04 ± 8 cm3 , respectively, P = 0.03).

Conclusion: Traditional PRT is not effective for reducing liver fat in overweight/obese adults compared with placebo control. Although PRT has known metabolic benefits, an adequate volume of aerobic exercise should be promoted if liver fat is the therapeutic target.

Keywords: exercise; liver fat; obesity; resistance training; visceral adiposity.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources