Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr 14;11(4):e0153497.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153497. eCollection 2016.

Association of Circulating Serum miR-34a and miR-122 with Dyslipidemia among Patients with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Affiliations

Association of Circulating Serum miR-34a and miR-122 with Dyslipidemia among Patients with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Noel C Salvoza et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) covers a spectrum of diseases from simple steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, with approximately 20% risk of progressing to fibrosis and cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to compare the relative expression levels of circulating miR-21, miR-34a, miR-122, miR-125b and miR-375 between healthy controls and NAFLD patients, and to assess the feasibility of microRNAs as potential biomarkers for NAFLD. A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate circulating serum miRNAs as potential diagnostic markers for NAFLD. Twenty-eight clinically diagnosed and histologically-confirmed NAFLD patients, as well as 36 healthy controls were enrolled in this study. The relative expression of serum microRNAs were calculated using the comparative cycle threshold with spiked-in C. elegans miR-39 as exogenous internal control. Serum levels of miR-34a and miR-122 were significantly higher in NAFLD patients than in healthy controls (P = <0.0001). Positive correlations were observed between serum miR-34a with very low density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C) and triglyceride levels. However, the expression levels of miR-34a and miR-122 did not correlate with the histological features of NAFLD. Interestingly, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that miR-34a and miR-122 are potential markers for discriminating NAFLD patients from healthy controls with an area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.781 and 0.858, respectively. Serum levels of miR-34a and miR-122 were found to be significantly higher among NAFLD patients, and were positively correlated with VLDL-C and triglyceride levels. Thus, circulating miR-34a and miR-122 can be used as potential biomarkers for discriminating NAFLD patients from healthy controls. Larger cohorts are required to validate the utility of miR-34a and miR-122 in monitoring liver injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Up-regulation of serum miR-34a and miR-122 in NAFLD patients.
Serum expression levels of miR-34a and miR-122 were measured in healthy controls and NAFLD patients. The relative expression levels were normalized to synthetic spike-in C. elegans miR-39. The P value was calculated according to Mann-Whitney U test. The horizontal lines indicate the medians.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Relative expression of serum miR-34a and miR-122 among healthy controls and NAFLD patients at various degree of liver steatosis.
The P values were calculated according to Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison post-test. In the boxplots, the vertical lines indicate the range and the horizontal boundaries of the boxes represent the first and third quartile. The lines inside the boxes denote the medians. * p>0.01–0.05; ** p = 0.001–0.01; *** p<0.001.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Relative expression of serum miR-34a and miR-122 among healthy controls and NAFLD patients according to stage of fibrosis and combined stages of fibrosis.
The P values were calculated according to Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison post-test. In the boxplots, the vertical lines indicate the range and the horizontal boundaries of the boxes represent the first and third quartile. The lines inside the boxes denote the medians. * p>0.01–0.05; ** p = 0.001–0.01; *** p<0.001.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Relative expression of serum miR-34a and miR-122 among healthy controls and NAFLD patients at various degree of inflammation.
The P values were calculated according to Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison post-test. In the boxplots, the vertical lines indicate the range and the horizontal boundaries of the boxes represent the first and third quartile. The lines inside the boxes denote the medians. * p>0.01–0.05; ** p = 0.001–0.01; *** p<0.001.
Fig 5
Fig 5. ROC curve analysis for serum miR-34a, miR-122 and ALT.
The AUC for serum miR-34a, miR-122 and ALT are 0.781, 0.858 and 0.832, respectively.

References

    1. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, Diehl AM, Brunt EM, Cusi K, et al. The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology and the American Gastroenterological Association. Am J Gastroenterol 2012. 107:811–826. 10.1038/ajg.2012.128 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sanyal AJ, Friedman SL, McCullough AJ, Dimick-Santos L. Findings and recommendations from an American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases US Food and Drug Administration Joint Workshop. Hepatology 2015. 61:1392–1405. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spengler EK, Loomba R. Recommendations for diagnosis, referral for liver biopsy and treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Mayo Clin Proc 2015. 90:1233–1246. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.06.013 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blachier M, Leleu H, Peck-Radosavljevic M, Valla DC, Roudot-Thoraval F. The burden of liver disease in Europe: A review of available epidemiological data. J Hepatol 2013. 58:593–608. 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.12.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anstee QM, Day CP. The genetics of NAFLD. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013. 10:645–655. 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.182 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms