Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar;26(2):153-157.
doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052821. Epub 2016 Apr 5.

Phantom smoking among young adult bar patrons

Affiliations

Phantom smoking among young adult bar patrons

Jamie Guillory et al. Tob Control. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To explore the prevalence and sociodemographic makeup of smokers who do not self-identify as smokers (ie, phantom smokers) compared with self-identifying smokers in a sample of bar-going young adults aged 18-30 years to more accurately assess young adult prevalence of smoking and inform cessation message targeting.

Methods: Cross-sectional surveys of smokers (n=3089) were conducted in randomly selected bars/nightclubs in seven US cities. Logistic regression models assessed associations between phantom smoking (past 30-day smoking and denial of being a smoker), tobacco and alcohol use behaviours (eg, social smoking, nicotine dependence, smoking while drinking, past 30-day alcohol use) and demographics.

Results: Compared with smokers, phantom smokers were more likely to be college graduates (OR=1.43, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.98) and to identify themselves as social smokers (OR=1.60, 95% CI 1.27 to 2.12). Phantom smokers had lower odds of smoking while drinking (OR=0.28, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.32), being nicotine dependent (OR=0.36, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.76) and having quit for at least 1 day in the last year (OR=0.46, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.69) compared with smokers.

Conclusions: This research extends phantom smoking literature on college students to provide a broader picture of phantom smoking among young adults in high-risk contexts and of varying levels of educational attainment. Phantom smokers may be particularly sensitive to social pressures against smoking, suggesting the importance of identifying smoking as a behaviour (rather than identity) in cessation messaging to ensure that phantom smokers are reached.

Keywords: Denormalization; Priority/special populations; Surveillance and monitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kvaavik E, von Soest T, Pedersen W. Nondaily smoking: a population-based, longitudinal study of stability and predictors. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:123. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lantz PM. Smoking on the rise among young adults: implications for research and policy. Tob Control. 2003;12(Suppl 1):i60–70. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wortley PM, Husten CG, Trosclair A, et al. Nondaily smokers: a descriptive analysis. Nicotine Tob Res. 2003;5:755–9. - PubMed
    1. Bjartveit K, Tverdal A. Health consequences of smoking 1–4 cigarettes per day. Tob Control. 2005;14:315–20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pope CA, III, Burnett RT, Krewski D, et al. Cardiovascular mortality and exposure to airborne fine particulate matter and cigarette smoke: shape of the exposure-response relationship. Circulation. 2009;120:941–8. - PubMed

Publication types