Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Oct 18;7(23):2459-69.
doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i23.2459.

Contribution of the toxic advanced glycation end-products-receptor axis in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis-related hepatocellular carcinoma

Jun-Ichi Takino  1 , Kentaro Nagamine  1 , Takamitsu Hori  1 , Akiko Sakasai-Sakai  1 , Masayoshi Takeuchi  1
Affiliations
Review

Contribution of the toxic advanced glycation end-products-receptor axis in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis-related hepatocellular carcinoma

Jun-Ichi Takino et al. World J Hepatol. .

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. The main etiologies of HCC are hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus (HCV), and non-hepatitis B/non-hepatitis C HCC (NBNC-HCC) has also been identified as an etiological factor. Although the incidence of HCV-related HCC in Japan has decreased slightly in recent years, that of NBNC-HCC has increased. The onset mechanism of NBNC-HCC, which has various etiologies, remains unclear; however, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), a severe form of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, is known to be an important risk factor for NBNC-HCC. Among the different advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) formed by the Maillard reaction, glyceraldehyde-derived AGEs, the predominant components of toxic AGEs (TAGE), have been associated with NASH and NBNC-HCC, including NASH-related HCC. Furthermore, the expression of the receptor for AGEs (RAGE) has been correlated with the malignant progression of HCC. Therefore, TAGE induce oxidative stress by binding with RAGE may, in turn, lead to adverse effects, such as fibrosis and malignant transformation, in hepatic stellate cells and tumor cells during NASH or NASH-related HCC progression. The aim of this review was to examine the contribution of the TAGE-RAGE axis in NASH-related HCC.

Keywords: Advanced glycation end-products; Hepatic stellate cells; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; Receptor for advanced glycation end-products; Toxic advanced glycation end-products.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Alternative routes for the formation of advanced glycation end-products in vivo. Reducing sugars, such as glucose, fructose, and glyceraldehyde are known to react non-enzymatically with the amino groups of proteins to form reversible Schiff bases and Amadori product/Heyns products. These early glycation products undergo further complex reactions such as rearrangement, dehydration, and condensation to become irreversibly cross-linked, heterogeneous fluorescent derivatives, termed advanced glycation end-products (AGEs). Glu-AGEs: Glucose-derived AGEs; Fru-AGEs: Fructose-derived AGEs; Glycer-AGEs: Glyceraldehyde-derived AGEs; Glycol-AGEs: Glycolaldehyde-derived AGEs; MGO-AGEs: Methylglyoxal-derived AGEs; GO-AGEs: Glyoxal-derived AGEs; 3-DG-AGEs: 3-deoxyglucosone-derived AGEs; CML: Nε-(carboxymethyl)lysine; P-NH2: Free amino residue of a protein; AR: Aldose reductase; SDH: Sorbitol dehydrogenase; FK: Fructokinase; HFCS: High-fructose corn syrup; HbA1c: Hemoglobin A1c; TAGE: Toxic advanced glycation end-products.
Figure 2
Figure 2
In vivo production routes of glycer-advanced glycation end-products (toxic advanced glycation end-products). The chronic and excessive ingestion of sugar-sweetened beverages (HFCS/sucrose) increases the levels of the sugar metabolite, glyceraldehyde in the liver. The glycolytic intermediate glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate (G-3-P) is normally catabolized (glycolysis) by the enzyme glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). G-3-P accumulates intracellularly with a decline in GAPDH activity. The metabolism of G-3-P then shifts to another route, resulting in an increase in the amount of glyceraldehyde, which promotes the formation of glycer-advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) (TAGE). Fructose from the daily diet and polyol pathway is phosphorylated to fructose-1-phosphate (F-1-P) by fructokinase and is then catabolized to glyceraldehyde and dihydroxyacetone phosphate by aldolase B (fructolysis). The newly synthesized glyceraldehyde is then transported or leaks passively across the plasma membrane. Glyceraldehyde promotes the formation of TAGE both intracellularly and extracellularly. DHA-P: Dihydroxyacetone-phosphate; FK: Fructokinase; HFCS: High-fructose corn syrup; TAGE: Toxic advanced glycation end-products; TG: Triglyceride; Protein-NH2: Free amino residue of a protein.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Proposed model for the contribution of the toxic advanced glycation end-products-receptor axis in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis-related hepatocellular carcinoma. The interaction between TAGE and RAGE alters intracellular signaling in tumor cells and hepatic stellate cells, and induces angiogenesis, invasion, migration, proliferation, and fibrosis. This cooperation by the TAGE-RAGE axis may lead to the malignant progression of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). CML and sRAGE inversely correlate with the risk of HCC, and sRAGE, which plays the role of a decoy receptor of RAGE, prevents the malignant progression of HCC. The TAGE-RAGE axis may become a treatment target in NASH and NASH-related HCC. CML: Nε-(carboxymethyl)lysine; ECs: Endothelial cells; EMT: Epithelial mesenchymal transition; HSCs: Hepatic stellate cells; MCP-1: Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; RAGE: Receptor for advanced glycation end-products; sRAGE: Soluble receptor for advanced glycation end; TAGE: Toxic advanced glycation end-products; TGF-β1: Transforming growth factor-β1; VEGF: Vascular endothelial growth factor.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Yu AS, Keeffe EB. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Rev Gastroenterol Disord. 2003;3:8–24. - PubMed
    1. Bosch FX, Ribes J, Díaz M, Cléries R. Primary liver cancer: worldwide incidence and trends. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:S5–S16. - PubMed
    1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:2893–2917. - PubMed
    1. Bosetti C, Turati F, La Vecchia C. Hepatocellular carcinoma epidemiology. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;28:753–770. - PubMed
    1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:74–108. - PubMed