Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;7(4):e35598.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035598. Epub 2012 Apr 18.

Flea diversity as an element for persistence of plague bacteria in an East African plague focus

Affiliations

Flea diversity as an element for persistence of plague bacteria in an East African plague focus

Rebecca J Eisen et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

Plague is a flea-borne rodent-associated zoonotic disease that is caused by Yersinia pestis and characterized by long quiescent periods punctuated by rapidly spreading epidemics and epizootics. How plague bacteria persist during inter-epizootic periods is poorly understood, yet is important for predicting when and where epizootics are likely to occur and for designing interventions aimed at local elimination of the pathogen. Existing hypotheses of how Y. pestis is maintained within plague foci typically center on host abundance or diversity, but little attention has been paid to the importance of flea diversity in enzootic maintenance. Our study compares host and flea abundance and diversity along an elevation gradient that spans from low elevation sites outside of a plague focus in the West Nile region of Uganda (~725-1160 m) to higher elevation sites within the focus (~1380-1630 m). Based on a year of sampling, we showed that host abundance and diversity, as well as total flea abundance on hosts was similar between sites inside compared with outside the plague focus. By contrast, flea diversity was significantly higher inside the focus than outside. Our study highlights the importance of considering flea diversity in models of Y. pestis persistence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Location of study sites in relation to areas of elevated risk for plague (color gradient) .
Inset shows location of the area of interest within Uganda. Sites 1–6 are situated below 1300 m and sites 7–10 are above this elevation threshold.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic of sampling design for a single homestead within a village.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Flea infestations of key hosts and Y. pestis vector species among sampling sites.
Rattus rattus, Arvicanthis niloticus, Crocidura spp. and Mastomys spp. are indicated as Rr, An, Cr, and Ma, respectively. Numbers of hosts examined per site is given in parentheses.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Comparison of host and flea diversity among sampling sites.
Host diversity indices were similar between sites above (7–10) and below (1–6) the 1300 m elevation threshold. Flea diversity was significantly higher for sites above 1300 m than below; Wilcoxon rank sums test with chi square approximation χ = 6.55 d.f. = 1 P = 0.01).

References

    1. Link VB. A history of plague in the United States. Washington, DC: Public Health Service; 1955. 120 - PubMed
    1. Perry RD, Fetherston JD. Yersinia pestis - Etiologic agent of plague. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10(1):35. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tikhomirov E. Epidemiology and distribution of plague. In: Dennis DT, Gage KL, Gratz N, Poland JD, Tikhomirov E, editors. Plague Manual: Epidemiology, Distribution, Surveillance and Control. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1999. pp. 11–37.
    1. Campbell GL, Hughes JM. Plague in India - a New Warning from an Old Nemesis. Ann Internal Med. 1995;122:151–153. - PubMed
    1. Eisen RJ, Enscore RE, Biggerstaff BJ, Reynolds PJ, Ettestad P, et al. Human plague in the southwestern United States, 1957–2004: Spatial models of elevated risk of human exposure to Yersinia pestis. J Med Entomol. 2007;44:530–537. - PubMed

Publication types