Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Apr;4(4):e151.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040151.

Comparative analysis of alcohol control policies in 30 countries

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparative analysis of alcohol control policies in 30 countries

Donald A Brand et al. PLoS Med. 2007 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Alcohol consumption causes an estimated 4% of the global disease burden, prompting governments to impose regulations to mitigate the adverse effects of alcohol. To assist public health leaders and policymakers, the authors developed a composite indicator-the Alcohol Policy Index-to gauge the strength of a country's alcohol control policies.

Methods and findings: The Index generates a score based on policies from five regulatory domains-physical availability of alcohol, drinking context, alcohol prices, alcohol advertising, and operation of motor vehicles. The Index was applied to the 30 countries that compose the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between policy score and per capita alcohol consumption. Countries attained a median score of 42.4 of a possible 100 points, ranging from 14.5 (Luxembourg) to 67.3 (Norway). The analysis revealed a strong negative correlation between score and consumption (r = -0.57; p = 0.001): a 10-point increase in the score was associated with a one-liter decrease in absolute alcohol consumption per person per year (95% confidence interval, 0.4-1.5 l). A sensitivity analysis demonstrated the robustness of the Index by showing that countries' scores and ranks remained relatively stable in response to variations in methodological assumptions.

Conclusions: The strength of alcohol control policies, as estimated by the Alcohol Policy Index, varied widely among 30 countries located in Europe, Asia, North America, and Australia. The study revealed a clear inverse relationship between policy strength and alcohol consumption. The Index provides a straightforward tool for facilitating international comparisons. In addition, it can help policymakers review and strengthen existing regulations aimed at minimizing alcohol-related harm and estimate the likely impact of policy changes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Alcohol Policy Scores of the 30 Countries Included in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
Figure 2
Figure 2. Point Breakdown of Alcohol Policy Scores by Regulatory Domain
Bar lengths indicate points credited to countries for alcohol control policies in each of five regulatory domains (physical availability of alcohol, drinking context, alcohol prices, alcohol advertising, and motor vehicles). –, zero points in a given domain. Points do not always add up to overall scores due to rounding errors. Numbers in parentheses indicate the full point value of each domain. Median scores within each domain and the overall median appear beneath the bars.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Score versus Alcohol Consumption
Scatter plot shows the relationship between alcohol policy score and annual per capita alcohol consumption. The regression line has a slope of −0.10 (p = 0.001), signifying a decrease in consumption of 1 l absolute alcohol for each 10-point increase in the score (95% CI 0.4–1.5 l). Arcs show 95% confidence limits. See Discussion for comments about the three identified countries.

References

    1. Rodgers A, Ezzati M, Vander Hoorn S, Lopez AD, Lin RB, et al. Distribution of major health risks: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease study. PLoS Med. 2004;1:e27. doi: . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Room R, Babor T, Rehm J. Alcohol and public health. Lancet. 2005;365:519–30. - PubMed
    1. Babor T, Caetano R, Casswell S, Edwards G, Giesbrecht N, et al. Alcohol: No ordinary commodity: Research and public policy. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003. 290
    1. Bruun K, Edwards G, Lumio M, et al. Alcohol control policies in public health perspective. Helsinki: The Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies; 1975. 106
    1. World Health Organization. Alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems: Development of national policies and programmes; The Thirty-sixth World Health Assembly, Twelfth plenary meeting,; 1983 13 May.; 1983. Committee A, first report. Available: http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/en/WHA36.12.pdf. Accessed 16 June 2005.

Publication types

MeSH terms