Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jan 29, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 30, 2026 - Mar 27, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Adoption of asynchronous secure messaging in hospital-based ambulatory specialty clinics in Ontario, Canada: A convergent mixed-methods study

  • Vess Stamenova; 
  • Taylor Pratt; 
  • Hayden Estabrook; 
  • Lori Wasserman; 
  • Onil Bhattacharyya; 
  • Payal Agarwal; 
  • Geetha Mukerji

ABSTRACT

Background:

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly increased adoption of virtual care, including patient-to-provider secure messaging. However, this surge has heightened physician workload and burnout and has raised concerns about message appropriateness and liability among physicians.

Objective:

This study characterizes secure messaging use in Canadian hospital-based specialty care and explores the experiences of healthcare providers, administrative staff, and patients.

Methods:

We employed a convergent mixed-methods design, analyzing aggregated electronic health record (EHR) usage data and qualitative interview data. The study was conducted at Women’s College Hospital in Toronto, Canada, across four high-messaging specialty clinics: mental health, rheumatology, dermatology, and surgery. Quantitative data (Oct, 2019-Oct, 2022) detailing message volumes, response patterns, and timing. Semi-structured interviews explored messaging workflows, barriers, and facilitators. Data were analyzed separately, then converged to identify areas of convergence and divergence.

Results:

Message volumes surged post-pandemic, particularly in mental health. The monthly message rate per patient varied, with higher rates in mental health and rheumatology. Physicians reported negative experiences due to increased workload, lack of compensation, and inadequate integration into clinical workflows. High patient-to-physician ratios and limited nursing support for message triage were associated with a poor messaging experience. Patients and administrative staff valued messaging for its convenience, accessibility, and efficiency. A key finding was the poor engagement of all user groups in decisions regarding messaging implementation.

Conclusions:

The study highlights a disconnect between the high perceived value of secure messaging for patients and administrative staff and the negative experiences of physicians. Successful implementation requires thoughtful integration into care models, clear guidelines for patient use, and proper triage and "channel management" to guide patients to appropriate visit modalities. Future research should explore triaging algorithms as part of a digital front door, specialty-specific variations and the crucial role of nursing staff in message management.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Stamenova V, Pratt T, Estabrook H, Wasserman L, Bhattacharyya O, Agarwal P, Mukerji G

Adoption of asynchronous secure messaging in hospital-based ambulatory specialty clinics in Ontario, Canada: A convergent mixed-methods study

JMIR Preprints. 29/01/2026:92432

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.92432

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/92432

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.