ABSTRACT
The emergence of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus has become a clinical problem in many parts of the world. Several amino acid mutations in the azole target protein Cyp51Ap contribute to this resistance, with the most concerning being the environmentally derived TR34/L98H and TR46/Y121F/T289A mutations. Here, we performed passive surveillance to assess a sample of the A. fumigatus population in the United States for the presence of these mutations. We found 1.4% of those isolates to exhibit elevated MIC via broth microdilution, and five of those isolates harbored the TR34/L98H mutation.
KEYWORDS: Aspergillus fumigatus, TR34/L98H, TR46/Y121F/T289A, azole resistance, CYP51A mutation
TEXT
The primary etiologic agent of aspergillosis in the United States is Aspergillus fumigatus. While voriconazole is currently recommended by the Infectious Disease Society of America as the primary therapy for aspergillosis, the detection of azole resistance among isolates of A. fumigatus has been reported in many parts of the world (1–10). The most common mechanism of resistance is a mutation in CYP51A, the gene encoding the drug target protein. Numerous mutations with clinical relevance have been identified, with the most frequent being TR34/L98H and TR46/Y121F/T289A (11). These two mutations are of particular concern, as evidence suggests that they are environmentally derived through the extensive use of agricultural fungicides and occur in isolates from azole-naive patients (12, 13).
Previously, we evaluated 1,026 A. fumigatus isolates, collected from across the United States between 2011 and 2013, for resistance to azoles and found no isolates with either the TR34 or TR46 mutation (14). Since that time, isolates with TR34 mutation were reported from patients in Pennsylvania in 2010 and 2012, and isolates with TR46 were reported from patients in Arizona in 2008 and Michigan in 2014, indicating that isolates with this mechanism of drug resistance are present in the United States (9, 15). Routine susceptibility testing of molds is uncommon in U.S. hospital laboratories, so the extent of azole resistance of A. fumigatus in this country is unknown. Here, we report on current U.S. surveillance for azole-resistant A. fumigatus and an evaluation of CYP51A mutations in resistant isolates.
Calls for the submission of A. fumigatus isolates were issued through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website (https://www.cdc.gov/fungal/pdf/a-fumigatus-isolate-surveillance.pdf) as well as the American Society for Microbiology (ASM) listservs DivC and ClinMicroNet. A total of 1,356 isolates of A. fumigatus were collected from September 2015 to April 2017. Species were confirmed as described previously (14).
Thirty-one hospitals, clinics, and state public health laboratories contributed isolates from 35 states and Washington, DC (Fig. 1). Many isolates were submitted from states/areas which were not previously involved in the earlier surveillance, including New Jersey (n = 17), Delaware (n = 15), Pennsylvania (n = 110), Maryland (n = 35), Washington, DC (n = 2), Ohio (n = 44), Kentucky (n = 13), Alabama (n = 1), Mississippi (n = 2), Wisconsin (n = 23), Arkansas (n = 14), Louisiana (n = 3), North Dakota (n = 6), Colorado (n = 5), New Mexico (n = 1), Utah (n = 19), and Alaska (n = 2) (14). Most isolates were from respiratory cultures (69%), but additional sources included wounds, tissues (e.g., eyes, ears, nails, and brain), body fluids, spinal specimens, and unknown.
FIG 1.
States of origin of 1,356 A. fumigatus isolates collected through passive surveillance, 2015 to 2017.
Isolates were initially screened for elevated MICs to itraconazole and voriconazole using Etest strips, according to the manufacturer's instructions (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France), with minor modifications as previously described (14). Those isolates with elevated MICs to one or more of the antifungals tested via Etest (≥2 μg/ml for itraconazole and voriconazole) were evaluated using broth microdilution according to CLSI guidelines (16) using custom-made frozen RPMI microbroth panels without indicator dye (Trek Diagnostics, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Oakwood Village, OH). An azole-resistant (TR34 mutant) isolate and an azole-susceptible isolate were used as controls in all testing, and the MIC values for these isolates remained within a tight range of 1 to 2 dilutions over the course of the testing (2). Although no interpretive breakpoints exist for Aspergillus species and the azoles, epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) have been proposed, and these ECVs were used in susceptibility testing interpretation (17). The MICs that indicate a non-wild-type profile for itraconazole and voriconazole were ≥2 μg/ml.
The vast majority (96.8%) of isolates were susceptible to both azoles tested. The MICs for Etests ranged from 0.032 to 6 μg/ml for voriconazole and 0.064 to >32 μg/ml for itraconazole (Fig. 2). The MIC50, MIC90, and modal MIC for all isolates tested with Etest were 0.25 μg/ml, 0.5 μg/ml, and 0.25 μg/ml, respectively, for voriconazole and 0.75 μg/ml, 1.5 μg/ml, and 0.5 μg/ml, respectively, for itraconazole. Of the 1,356 isolates, 43 isolates exhibited elevated MICs when screened with Etest and were further tested using broth microdilution. Of these 43 isolates, 20 exhibited elevated MICs to one or both antifungals via broth microdilution.
FIG 2.

Susceptibility profiles for A. fumigatus isolates via Etest method. Dashed line represents the CLSI microdilution method ECV cutoff between wild type and non-wild type.
DNA sequence analysis of the CYP51A gene was performed for any isolate with elevated MICs confirmed via broth microdilution, as previously described (18). Sequencing revealed that 14 of 20 isolates contained an amino acid substitution in Cyp51A (Table 1). There were no novel mutations observed in these isolates; all have been previously described (14, 19). The most common substitution was I242V (n = 6), which was also the most common substitution found in previous surveillance (14). These isolates showed an MIC to voriconazole ranging from 0.06 to 2 μg/ml and an MIC to itraconazole ranging from 2 to >16 μg/ml, as measured by broth microdilution (Table 1). Five isolates contained the TR34/L98H mutation, either alone or in combination with additional mutations. Two of these isolates originated from Pennsylvania, two from Virginia, and one from California. These isolates had MICs to voriconazole ranging from 0.25 to 2 μg/ml and MICs to itraconazole ranging from 4 to >16 μg/ml, as measured by broth microdilution. The TR46 mutation was not identified in this collection of isolates.
TABLE 1.
MICs of A. fumigatus isolates and amino acid substitutions in Cyp51A
| Isolate no. | State of origina | Yr received | Amino acid substitution(s) in Cyp51A | MIC (μg/ml) tob: | 
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Itraconazole | Voriconazole | ||||
| 1415 | Georgia | 2015 | I242V | 2 | 1 | 
| 1417 | Georgia | 2015 | 2 | 0.5 | |
| 1484 | Indiana | 2015 | 2 | 0.5 | |
| 1549 | Georgia | 2015 | 2 | 0.5 | |
| 1554 | Georgia | 2015 | 2 | 1 | |
| 1709 | Maryland | 2015 | P216L | 2 | 0.06 | 
| 1878 | Indiana | 2016 | F46Y/M172V/N248T/D255E/E427K | 2 | 0.5 | 
| 1926 | California | 2016 | F46Y/M172V/N248T/D255E/E427K | 2 | 0.5 | 
| 1990 | Georgia | 2016 | 2 | 1 | |
| 2001 | Pennsylvania | 2016 | TR34/L98H | 4 | 2 | 
| 2105 | Georgia | 2016 | I242V | 2 | 1 | 
| 2211 | Georgia | 2016 | I242V | 2 | 0.5 | 
| 2241 | California | 2016 | I242V | 2 | 0.5 | 
| 2242 | California | 2016 | 2 | 1 | |
| 2254 | Virginia | 2016 | TR34/L98H/S297T/F495I | >16 | 1 | 
| 2288 | Georgia | 2016 | I242V | 2 | 1 | 
| 2305 | Virginia | 2016 | I242V | 2 | 1 | 
| 2714 | Pennsylvania | 2017 | TR34/L98H | 16 | 2 | 
| 2768 | Virginia | 2017 | TR34/L98H | 16 | 0.5 | 
| 2889 | California | 2017 | TR34/L98H/S297T/F495I | 8 | 0.25 | 
The state of origin is the home state of the patient and not necessarily the state of the laboratory which submitted the isolate.
MIC as measured by broth microdilution.
A limitation of this monitoring system is the voluntary submission of isolates resulting in nonuniform geographic distribution of submitting labs. In the current surveillance, few to no isolates from much of the Midwest and the Pacific Northwest regions of the country were received. We also received very few isolates from the southeastern United States outside Georgia (Fig. 1). Therefore, these surveillance data do not capture an accurate geographic picture of A. fumigatus isolates carrying the TR34 mutation, especially in underrepresented regions of the country or those with no submitted isolates. The number of resistant isolates reported here is likely a substantial underestimate of their true presence in the United States.
Environmentally acquired resistance to azole antifungals is not associated with a fitness cost to the organism (20). As a result, resistant isolates likely persist alongside wild-type isolates in the environment (the frequency with which this happens in the United States is unknown). We recently identified azole-resistant A. fumigatus containing the TR34 mutation in an experimental peanut field in Georgia that had been treated with azole fungicides (18). In the present study, Georgia contributed more clinical isolates to our survey than any other state, but we did not observe the TR34 mutation from any of these isolates. To our knowledge, no studies have been performed in Pennsylvania, Virginia, or California to determine if TR34 or TR46 could be identified in the environment.
In this report, 14 of 19 total confirmed azole-resistant isolates contained a CYP51A polymorphism (74%), although not all of these polymorphisms have been directly linked to azole resistance. However, there were additional isolates that exhibited elevated MICs via broth microdilution and did not contain such mutations (Table 1). This finding supports the idea that other resistance pathways exist for this organism and could be operative among these isolates (21). Additional molecular testing of these isolates is warranted.
This study was determined to be surveillance and not involving human subjects under 45 CFR 46.102(f) (22), and no institutional review board (IRB) review was required.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We extend our thanks to the staff of the Mycotic Diseases Branch at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We also thank members of each facility that contributed isolates to this study: Ellen Wirtz of Agnesian Healthcare, Kimberly Hanson of Associated Regional and University Pathologists, Inc. (ARUP), Robert Jerris of the Children's Hospital of Atlanta, Barbara Robinson-Dunn of William Beaumont Hospital, Dana Arnold of Children's Medical Center Dallas, Katie Ruger of Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Demi Norwood of Cook Children's Medical Center, Eileen Burd of Emory University Hospital, Elizabeth Franko of the Public Health Laboratory of Georgia, Kevin Alby of the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Judith Lovchik of the Indiana Department of Health, Ryan F. Relich of the Indiana University Health Pathology Laboratory, Patricia L. Kammeyer of Loyola University Medical Center, Nancy Wengenack of Mayo Clinic, Joslyn Pribble of the Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Jill Fischer and Ruth Rutledge of the Minnesota Department of Health, Christina Henderson of the National Institutes of Health, Sanchita Das of the NorthShore University HealthSystem, New York University Langone Medical Center, Kathy Judge and Amy Wilkerson of Sentara Healthcare, St. Luke's Hospital Massachusetts, Laurie Helm and Joy Vang of Sutter Health, Sonia Allen of University of the North Carolina Hospital, Judith Feagin of University Hospitals of Cleveland, Lynn Ellis and Mary Scoble of the Virginia Department of Health, Melinda Poulter of the University of Virginia School of Medicine, Kim Nichols and Jessica Thorne of Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Katherine Faulds, Sirgut Legesse, and Liza Meana of the Virginia Hospital Center, and J. Delgadi of Winchester Medical Center.
The findings and conclusions in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
REFERENCES
- 1.Verweij PE, Mellado E, Melchers WJ. 2007. Multiple-triazole-resistant aspergillosis. N Engl J Med 356:1481–1483. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc061720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 - 2.Lockhart SR, Frade JP, Etienne KA, Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Balajee SA. 2011. Azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus isolates from the ARTEMIS global surveillance study is primarily due to the TR/L98H mutation in the cyp51A gene. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:4465–4468. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00185-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 - 3.Kidd SE, Goeman E, Meis JF, Slavin MA, Verweij PE. 2015. Multi-triazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus infections in Australia. Mycoses 58:350–355. doi: 10.1111/myc.12324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 - 4.Chowdhary A, Kathuria S, Randhawa HS, Gaur SN, Klaassen CH, Meis JF. 2012. Isolation of multiple-triazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus strains carrying the TR/L98H mutations in the cyp51A gene in India. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:362–366. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 - 5.Seyedmousavi S, Hashemi SJ, Zibafar E, Zoll J, Hedayati MT, Mouton JW, Melchers WJ, Verweij PE. 2013. Azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus, Iran. Emerg Infect Dis 19:832–834. doi: 10.3201/eid1905.130075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 - 6.Ahmad S, Khan Z, Hagen F, Meis JF. 2014. Occurrence of triazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus with TR34/L98H mutations in outdoor and hospital environment in Kuwait. Environ Res 133:20–26. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 - 7.Chowdhary A, Sharma C, van den Boom M, Yntema JB, Hagen F, Verweij PE, Meis JF. 2014. Multi-azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus in the environment in Tanzania. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:2979–2983. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 - 8.Le Pape P, Lavergne RA, Morio F, Alvarez-Moreno C. 2016. Multiple fungicide-driven alterations in azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus, Colombia, 2015. Emerg Infect Dis 22:156–157. doi: 10.3201/eid2201.150978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 - 9.Wiederhold NP, Garcia Gil V, Gutierrez F, Lindner JR, Albataineh MT, McCarthy DI, Sanders C, Fan H, Fothergill AW, Sutton DA. 2015. First detection of TR34/L98H and TR46/Y121F/T289A Cyp51 mutations in Aspergillus fumigatus isolates in the United States. J Clin Microbiol 54:168–171. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02478-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 - 10.Walsh TJ, Anaissie EJ, Denning DW, Herbrecht R, Kontoyiannis DP, Marr KA, Morrison VA, Segal BH, Steinbach WJ, Stevens DA, van Burik JA, Wingard JR, Patterson TF, Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2008. Treatment of aspergillosis: clinical practice guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 46:327–360. doi: 10.1086/525258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 - 11.Verweij PE, Chowdhary A, Melchers WJ, Meis JF. 2016. Azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: can we retain the clinical use of mold-active antifungal azoles? Clin Infect Dis 62:362–368. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 - 12.Snelders E, Huis In 't Veld RA, Rijs AJ, Kema GH, Melchers WJ, Verweij PE. 2009. Possible environmental origin of resistance of Aspergillus fumigatus to medical triazoles. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:4053–4057. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00231-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 - 13.Verweij PE, Snelders E, Kema GH, Mellado E, Melchers WJ. 2009. Azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: a side-effect of environmental fungicide use? Lancet Infect Dis 9:789–795. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70265-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 - 14.Pham CD, Reiss E, Hagen F, Meis JF, Lockhart SR. 2014. Passive surveillance for azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus, United States, 2011–2013. Emerg Infect Dis 20:1498–1503. doi: 10.3201/eid2009.140142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 - 15.Vazquez JA, Manavathu EK. 2016. Molecular characterization of a voriconazole-resistant, posaconazole-susceptible Aspergillus fumigatus isolate in a lung transplant recipient in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:1129–1133. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01130-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 - 16.CLSI. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi; approved standard, 2nd ed. CLSI document M38-A2 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
 - 17.Espinel-Ingroff A, Diekema DJ, Fothergill A, Johnson E, Pelaez T, Pfaller MA, Rinaldi MG, Canton E, Turnidge J. 2010. Wild-type MIC distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for the triazoles and six Aspergillus spp. for the CLSI broth microdilution method (M38-A2 document). J Clin Microbiol 48:3251–3257. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00536-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 - 18.Hurst SF, Berkow EL, Stevenson KL, Litvintseva AP, Lockhart SR. 2017. Isolation of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus from the environment in the south-eastern USA. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:2443–2446. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 - 19.Howard SJ, Cerar D, Anderson MJ, Albarrag A, Fisher MC, Pasqualotto AC, Laverdiere M, Arendrup MC, Perlin DS, Denning DW. 2009. Frequency and evolution of Azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus associated with treatment failure. Emerg Infect Dis 15:1068–1076. doi: 10.3201/eid1507.090043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 - 20.Mavridou E, Meletiadis J, Jancura P, Abbas S, Arendrup MC, Melchers WJ, Heskes T, Mouton JW, Verweij PE. 2013. Composite survival index to compare virulence changes in azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus clinical isolates. PLoS One 8:e72280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 - 21.Moye-Rowley WS. 2015. Multiple mechanisms contribute to the development of clinically significant azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus. Front Microbiol 6:70. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 - 22.Code of Federal Regulations. 2009. Title 45. Public welfare. Department of Health and Human Services. Part 46. Protection of human subjects. Definition (f). 45 CFR 46.102(f). https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/index.html. [PubMed]
 

