Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1988 Oct 15;297(6654):958–960. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6654.958

Wholemeal versus wholegrain breads: proportion of whole or cracked grain and the glycaemic response.

D J Jenkins 1, V Wesson 1, T M Wolever 1, A L Jenkins 1, J Kalmusky 1, S Guidici 1, A Csima 1, R G Josse 1, G S Wong 1
PMCID: PMC1834634  PMID: 3142566

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE--To determine the effect on the glycaemic response to bread of the ratio of whole cereal grains to milled flour. DESIGN--Randomised assignment of groups of diabetic volunteers to test and control meals, taken after an overnight fast. Test foods were also analysed for in vitro digestion with human saliva. SETTING--Tertiary care centre. PATIENTS--Groups of six drawn from pool of 16 volunteers with diabetes mellitus (11 men, five women; mean age 64 (SE 3); 10 taking insulin, five taking oral agents, one controlled by diet; other characteristics comparable). INTERVENTIONS--All patients took standard white bread control meals on three occasions spanning the study and on different mornings took test meals containing varying ratios of whole cereal grains (barley or cracked wheat) to milled flour (75:25, 50:50, 0:100). All meals contained 50 g available carbohydrate and were eaten in 15 minutes. Capillary blood samples were taken for determination of glucose concentrations every 30 minutes for three hours. END POINT--Glycaemic index of foods (= increase in area under blood glucose concentration curve for test food divided by increase in area under curve for white bread control X 100). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS--Significant trend to lower glycaemic index with increasing proportion of whole cereal grains in test bread (p less than 0.05) and lower in vitro digestibility (p less than 0.001). Breads containing up to 75% whole grain were considered palatable. CONCLUSIONS--Breads containing a high proportion of whole cereal grains may be useful in reducing the postprandial blood glucose profile in diabetics because they are more slowly digested. These breads should be called "wholegrain" in distinction to "wholemeal" breads made from milled flour.

Full text

PDF
958

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brand J. C., Nicholson P. L., Thorburn A. W., Truswell A. S. Food processing and the glycemic index. Am J Clin Nutr. 1985 Dec;42(6):1192–1196. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/42.6.1192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Haber G. B., Heaton K. W., Murphy D., Burroughs L. F. Depletion and disruption of dietary fibre. Effects on satiety, plasma-glucose, and serum-insulin. Lancet. 1977 Oct 1;2(8040):679–682. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(77)90494-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jenkins D. J., Thorne M. J., Camelon K., Jenkins A., Rao A. V., Taylor R. H., Thompson L. U., Kalmusky J., Reichert R., Francis T. Effect of processing on digestibility and the blood glucose response: a study of lentils. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982 Dec;36(6):1093–1101. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/36.6.1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jenkins D. J., Wolever T. M., Jenkins A. L., Giordano C., Giudici S., Thompson L. U., Kalmusky J., Josse R. G., Wong G. S. Low glycemic response to traditionally processed wheat and rye products: bulgur and pumpernickel bread. Am J Clin Nutr. 1986 Apr;43(4):516–520. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/43.4.516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jenkins D. J., Wolever T. M., Jenkins A. L., Lee R., Wong G. S., Josse R. Glycemic response to wheat products: reduced response to pasta but no effect of fiber. Diabetes Care. 1983 Mar-Apr;6(2):155–159. doi: 10.2337/diacare.6.2.155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jenkins D. J., Wolever T. M., Jenkins A. L., Thorne M. J., Lee R., Kalmusky J., Reichert R., Wong G. S. The glycaemic index of foods tested in diabetic patients: a new basis for carbohydrate exchange favouring the use of legumes. Diabetologia. 1983 Apr;24(4):257–264. doi: 10.1007/BF00282710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jenkins D. J., Wolever T. M., Leeds A. R., Gassull M. A., Haisman P., Dilawari J., Goff D. V., Metz G. L., Alberti K. G. Dietary fibres, fibre analogues, and glucose tolerance: importance of viscosity. Br Med J. 1978 May 27;1(6124):1392–1394. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6124.1392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jenkins D. J., Wolever T. M., Taylor R. H., Barker H. M., Fielden H., Gassull M. A. Lack of effect of refining on the glycemic response to cereals. Diabetes Care. 1981 Sep-Oct;4(5):509–513. doi: 10.2337/diacare.4.5.509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. O'Dea K., Nestel P. J., Antonoff L. Physical factors influencing postprandial glucose and insulin responses to starch. Am J Clin Nutr. 1980 Apr;33(4):760–765. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/33.4.760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Parillo M., Giacco R., Riccardi G., Pacioni D., Rivellese A. Different glycaemic responses to pasta, bread, and potatoes in diabetic patients. Diabet Med. 1985 Sep;2(5):374–377. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1985.tb00655.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Torsdottir I., Alpsten M., Andersson D., Brummer R. J., Andersson H. Effect of different starchy foods in composite meals on gastric emptying rate and glucose metabolism. I. Comparisons between potatoes, rice and white beans. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr. 1984 Sep;38(5):329–338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wong S., O'Dea K. Importance of physical form rather than viscosity in determining the rate of starch hydrolysis in legumes. Am J Clin Nutr. 1983 Jan;37(1):66–70. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/37.1.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES