@JKatzWMF: @nettrom_WMF will pull # of edits on mobile YoY in target languages

Can you clarify this part of the request? (We don't have time for an impact analysis; I wasn't sure if this was just added context?)

Even if we show a 20% increase, we will need to explain that it doesn't come from interventions, but that our experiments (such as iOS) are promising.

@kzimmerman @nettrom_WMF - no request here, just offering context for how the data will be used. I'll do the explaining.

In T214134#4900610, @kzimmerman wrote:

@JKatzWMF: @nettrom_WMF will pull # of edits on mobile YoY in target languages

Can you clarify this part of the request? (We don't have time for an impact analysis; I wasn't sure if this was just added context?)

Even if we show a 20% increase, we will need to explain that it doesn't come from interventions, but that our experiments (such as iOS) are promising.

I defined "mobile edits" as edits made through both the mobile site and the apps (since the request mentions iOS), and used the canonical list of mobile-heavy wikis. I removed edits by users with a bot flag. Comparing Oct–Dec 2017 with Oct–Dec 2018, I get the following:

2017: 242,858
2018: 340,950 (+40.4%)

Let me know if any changes are needed, and I'll adapt my queries and code and report back.

@nettrom_WMF @kzimmerman this is exactly what I needed. No more, no less and on time. Thanks!

The target in the annual plan was:
"Number of edits on mobile increases by 20% year-over-year in target languages. "

We should be aware that this is from the org-wide annual plan, not from the more specific Audiences annual plan which gives 10% as target instead - e.g. "Mobile web edit rate on target wikis: 10% increase", similarly for the other three related team goals. Also, "target wikis" are interpreted very differently there, see e.g. T210660 for the web team's version; I believe the apps teams may not be using the mobile-heavy segment for this either. Where did we document the decision to interpret "target wikis" in the org-wide annual plan as mobile-heavy wikis? This would also be useful input for T215976. (Back in July, there had been a sense that these are two different things - will also follow up on an email thread from back then.)