Skip to main content

Questions tagged [fine-structure]

Individual levels of inner models, projecta, mastercodes, definability, Jensen's covering lemma.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
15 votes
1 answer
765 views

Working in $ZFC$, the statement "$0^\sharp$ exists" is often liberally taken to be one of many known equivalent statements. However, working in $Z_2$ or $ZFC^-$ (with collection, well-...
user116499's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
211 views

Let $J$ denote Jensen's modification of the constructible hierarchy. For an ordinal $\alpha$ and an $n\in\mathbb N^+$, let $\rho_n^{J_\alpha}$ denote the $\Sigma_n$-projectum of $J_\alpha$, the least $...
C7X's user avatar
  • 2,884
4 votes
1 answer
1k views

To simplify the notation, assume $V=L$. We have $\lvert V_{\omega_{1}} \rvert=\aleph_{\omega_{1}}$ and $\lvert H(\aleph_{1})\rvert=\aleph_{1}$, so in particular $V_{\omega_{1}} \models \exists x \...
Ândson josé's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
297 views

For $M$ an amenable structure and $X \subset M$, the $\Sigma_n$ Skolem hull of $X$ is a $\Sigma_n$-elementary submodel of $M$. That is, as presentend in Devlin, Constructibility, pp. 85-88, for $h_n$ ...
Johan's user avatar
  • 531
9 votes
2 answers
688 views

This question arises out of having Devlin's Constructibility [1] in my collection of books at home during the lockdown. Chapter IX of the book deals with Silver machines, which are presented as ...
Todd Eisworth's user avatar
6 votes
1 answer
411 views

Q: What exactly is a power admissible model? Background: Admissible models, introduced by Jon Barwise, form the building blocks of inner model theory. They are transitive models $\mathcal M = (M; \in)...
Stefan Mesken's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
290 views

Consider the following result (which is Lemma 2.8 in Mitchell and Steel's paper on Fine Structure and Iteration Trees): Lemma 2.8 Let $\pi \colon \mathcal{H} \to \mathcal{M}$ be generalized $r \...
Stefan Mesken's user avatar
7 votes
0 answers
364 views

$\mathsf{fReR}_0$ is the set-theoretical system whose axioms consist of: (1) Axiom of extensionality: $\forall z\in x\ (z\in y)\wedge\forall z\in y\ (z\in x)\rightarrow x=y$ (2) Axiom of empty set: $...
Sencodian's user avatar
  • 173
4 votes
2 answers
426 views

Let $\mathrm{R}_0,\cdots,\mathrm{R}_8$ be the following functions: $\mathrm{R}_0(x,y)=\{x,y\}$ $\mathrm{R}_1(x,y)=x-y$ $\mathrm{R}_2(x)=\bigcup x$ $\mathrm{R}_3(x,y)=x\times y$ $\mathrm{R}_4(x)=\...
Sencodian's user avatar
  • 173