-1
$\begingroup$

I am looking for related constructions in spectral theory / random matrix theory / dynamical systems where a triadic (three-vertex) geometric criterion acts as a sharp switch for an order–chaos transition.

The structural motif is as follows. Consider a dyad (i,j) together with a third “anchor” vertex a. Embed the three vertices into a low-dimensional coordinate (for example)

u_k = ( z_k / z_0 , cos θ_k , sin θ_k ) ∈ R^3

and define the dyadic barycentre

ū_ij = (u_i + u_j) / 2 .

The key triadic quantity is the barycentric deviation

b_{ij|a} = || u_a − ū_ij || .

A sharp transition is modelled by a tolerance threshold b_c, e.g.

S_{ij|a} = 1{ b_{ij|a} > b_c }

or, in a smoothed form,

S_{ij|a} = sigmoid( k ( b_{ij|a} − b_c ) ),

so that crossing the tolerance boundary triggers a qualitative change (interpreted as an order–chaos switch).

In my setting, this triadic switch amplifies a breakdown / diffusion mechanism (rather than pairwise stress alone), but my question is purely structural:

  1. Are there known results or standard constructions where a triadic geometric deviation (barycentric distance, triangle area, or related invariants) acts as a threshold for instability, dephasing, or a transition between ordered and chaotic regimes?

  2. In related literature, is it more natural to treat the threshold as context-dependent (varying with background state) rather than as a fixed global constant? If so, what frameworks capture this cleanly?

  3. Any pointers to analogous third-vertex switching mechanisms in spectral or random-matrix contexts (beyond purely pairwise couplings) would be appreciated.

For reference, the full formulation (including notation and the motivation for triadic switching) is available as a preprint:

Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17950100

I am not claiming any relation to the Riemann Hypothesis; this is a structural question about triadic thresholds and order–chaos switching.

New contributor
Gaasu forest Come here is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.
$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ You are basically advertising your preprint with what is LLM-generated text (unless of course you are generating Unicode input yourself, in which case I apologise for the presumption). Why are you bringing up the Riemann Hypothesis in any case? Seems like an unusually defensive move. If you have a research question that can be asked self-contained without linking to Zenodo then you might have a case to keep this open. Sorry to be blunt, but the number of people who now link to their Zenodo preprint and ask for people to do a literature search on prior art for them is increasing—and unwelcome. $\endgroup$ Commented 2 days ago

0

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.