2
$\begingroup$

The standard Gale-Ryser theorem is for the existence of a $(0,1)$-matrix given exact row sums $R = (r_1, \dots, r_K)$ and exact column sums $C = (c_1, \dots, c_M)$. What if we relax the column sums and want at most those $c_j$ instead of exactly those $c_j$. What are the then necessary and sufficient conditions. Are they the same (except for the total sum obviously, which disappears)?

I'm only familiar with Krause's algorithmic proof of the Gale-Ryser theorem and would like to work on that extension of Gale-Ryser without resorting to flows.

$\endgroup$

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.