1
$\begingroup$

Let $R$ be a (possibly noncommutative) ring. Recall that an ideal $I \subseteq R$ is called idempotent if $I^2=I$, meaning that every element of $I$ can be written as a finite sum of products of elements from $I$.

Suppose that every two-sided maximal ideal $M \subseteq R$ is idempotent: that is, $M^2=M$ for all two-sided maximal ideals $M$.

Question:

  • Under this assumption, what can we say about the structure of the ring $R$ ?
  • In particular, does this condition imply that $R$ must be semisimple Artinian (for example, a finite product of simple rings)?
  • Are there interesting examples or counterexamples if $R$ is not assumed to be Artinian?

Any references, examples, or structural results would be appreciated.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Cross-posted on math.stackexchange $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 27 at 8:46
  • $\begingroup$ For commutative $R$, this holds iff every module of finite length is semisimple. (The proof of Th. 2.15 shows that it is in fact sufficient that every module of length 2 is semisimple.) $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 29 at 14:27

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

In a von Neumann regular ring, every two sided ideal is idempotent. This is a large class of rings. It contains many that are not semisimple Artinian.

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ However the condition of the OP is not enough to get von Neumann regular. See math.stackexchange.com/questions/1678681/… $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 26 at 18:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No, I'm aware of that. For example, there are rings with no maximal ideals at all, such as indiscrete valuation rings. These vacuously satisfy the hypothesis. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 26 at 18:54
  • $\begingroup$ Yes I know but I would like to find characterizations of rings where every two sided maximal ideal is idempotent. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 26 at 18:55
  • $\begingroup$ I guess I was only answering one of your questions. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 26 at 19:00
  • $\begingroup$ @DaveBenson I don't think what you wrote in your first comment is what you meant to write. But in a valuation ring whose value group has no minimum positive element, the unique maximal ideal is idempotent. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 27 at 18:12

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.