2
$\begingroup$

Let $\mathcal{E}$ be a torsion free coherent sheaf on $\mathbb{P}_2$. Then sub-sheaves $\mathcal{E}_1$ and $\mathcal{E}_2$ of $\mathcal{E}$ are saturated if $\mathcal{E}/\mathcal{E}_i$ are torsion free for $i=1,2$. Then is $\mathcal{E}_1+\mathcal{E}_2$ also saturated ie $\frac{\mathcal{E}}{\mathcal{E}_1+\mathcal{E}_2}$ is torsion free? (we take $\mathcal{E}_i$ to be torsion free themselves for $i=1,2$.)

In further assumption if we are given $\mathcal{E}_1\cap \mathcal{E}_2 = 0$ then does it play a roll in the saturation of $\mathcal{E}_1+\mathcal{E}_2 \simeq \mathcal{E}_1 \oplus \mathcal{E}_2$?

I came across a similar claim in the following ref pg-39.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Welcome new contributor. That is not true without further hypotheses (that might be implicit in Lemma 2.51 of that article -- I am unfamiliar with "$(D,F)$-framable" sheaves). Let $\mathcal{E}$ be the locally free sheaf $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^2}\oplus \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^2}(1)$ on $\mathbb{P}^2$. Let $\mathcal{E}_1$ and $\mathcal{E}_2$ be the graphs of two morphisms from $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^2}$ to $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^2}(1)$. These are each saturated. However, the cokernel of the sum is torsion-free if and only if $\mathcal{E}_1$ equals $\mathcal{E}_2$. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 22 at 16:15
  • $\begingroup$ In that article, it appears that the author assumes that $\mathcal{E}$ is semistable with slope equal to the slopes of both $\mathcal{E}_1$ and $\mathcal{E}_2$. That excludes the example in my previous comment. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 22 at 16:21
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the comment! It does help knowing this is dependent on the semi-stability of $\mathcal{E}$ and the slopes being equal! it probably is implicit hypothesis! $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 22 at 16:24

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.