1
$\begingroup$

Let $\mathbb{F}$ be a field and W be the Weyl algebra, as the algebra over $\mathbb{F}$ generated by $a,b$ with relation $ab-ba=1$.

The description of simple modules over the Weyl algebra over algebraically closed fields of characteristic $p$ is known, they have dimension $p$ over $\mathbb F$ and they are in one to one correspondence with pairs of matrices of the form

$$M_a:=\begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 & \cdots & \mu \\ 1 & 0 & 0 & \cdots & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & \cdots & 0 \\ \vdots & \ddots & \ddots & \ddots & \vdots \\ 0 & \cdots & 0 & 1 & 0 \end{bmatrix}, \quad M_b:=\begin{bmatrix} \lambda & p-1 & 0 & \cdots & 0 \\ 0 & \lambda & p-2 & \ddots & \vdots \\ 0 & 0 & \lambda & \ddots & 0 \\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \ddots & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & \cdots & 0 & \lambda \end{bmatrix}$$

for $\mu,\lambda \in \mathbb{F}$.

Let $\mathbb{F}=\mathbb{Z}_p$ be the field of $p$ elements and assume that $M$ is a module such that the action of $a$ and $b$ is invertible. Then, condition $ab-ba=1$ implies that $\dim_{\mathbb{F}}(M)$ is a multiple of $p$. So, assume that $\dim_{\mathbb{F}}(M)=p$. Is it true that if $M$ is simple then $M$ is given by a pair of matrices as above?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ For algebraically closed $\mathbb F$, the answer is yes, according to ferngaston.wordpress.com/2016/06/30/… . For $\mathbb F = \mathbb Z_p$, I suspect that is no, since I don't think the eigenvalues have to lie in $\mathbb Z_p$. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 14, 2024 at 20:55

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

The answer to your particular question is Yes.

First of all, whenever you have representation over $\mathbb F_p$ you have a representation over its algebraic closure. First claim that when you suppose $\dim M = p$ then it is simple over algebraic closure $\mathbb F$. The reason for that is that dimension $p$ is minimal possible so over algebraic closure it's impossible to have non-trivial submodule.

Next claim is that the eigenvalues of $M_b $ lie in $ \mathbb F_p $ in that case. The characteristic polynomial equals to $(x -\lambda)^p$. So $\lambda^p \in \mathbb F_p$ thus $\lambda \in \mathbb F_p$.

Fix the basis over algebraic closure $e_1, \dots, e_p$ for which $M_a$, $M_b$ has desired form. I claim that $e_i$ are in $\mathbb F_p$ (up to constant). First of all $e_1$ is unique (up to constant) eigenvector for $M_b$ with eigenvalue $\lambda$ from $\mathbb F_p$. So it could be chosen as $\mathbb F_p$ vector. Then $e_2, \dots, e_p$ are also $\mathbb F_p$ vectors, as they are of the form $M_a^k e_1$. Then $\mu$ also in $\mathbb F_p$. So the matrices in basis $e_1, \dots, e_p$ has desired form.

Although the converse, that all simple modules have dimension $p$, is not true because if one does not restrict dimension, $M_b$ could have more than one eigenvalue, all of them lying outside $\mathbb F_p$.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.