4
$\begingroup$

Consider the triple-indexed sequence of integers defined by \begin{align} \label{coefficientsV} \nonumber f(\alpha,\beta,\gamma) &:=(2\alpha+8\beta+12\gamma-1)\cdot f(\alpha-1,\beta,\gamma) - 2(\alpha+1)\cdot f(\alpha+1,\beta-1,\gamma) \\ &\qquad \ \ \ \ \ - {\color{red}8}(\beta+1)\cdot f(\alpha,\beta+1,\gamma-1)- 12(\gamma+1)\cdot f(\alpha,\beta-2,\gamma+1), \end{align} where $\alpha, \beta, \gamma\geq0$. To list them as triangular arrays, choose $(\alpha,\beta,\gamma)$ such that $\alpha+2\beta+3\gamma=t$ for a given $t\geq0$.

To seed the recursion, we let $f(0, 0, 0):=1,$ and we let $f(\alpha,\beta,\gamma):=0$ if any of the arguments are negative. Here we list the ``first few'' values: \begin{align*} f(1,0,0)=1, \ f(0,1,0)=-2,\ f(0,0,1)=16, \ f(1,1,0)=-30, \ f(1,0,1)=448,\dots. \end{align*}

QUESTION. Is it possible to give some closed formula or a generating function representation of the above sequence?

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean by "set the condition $\alpha+2\beta+3\gamma=t$ for a given $t\geq0$"? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 17, 2024 at 19:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ But $\alpha+2\beta+3\gamma$ always is equal to something. Another thing is that LHS of your relation has only triples for which this guy equals $t-1$, thus it makes reasonable to consider the sequence of generating polynomials over such triangles. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 17, 2024 at 20:24
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I get $f(0,0,1)=6$ and $f(1,0,1)=168$, please check. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 18, 2024 at 19:56
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Seems to be $\ldots -8(\beta+1) \ldots$ instead of $\ldots -3(\beta+1)\ldots$. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 18, 2024 at 20:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You are absolutely right, we need $-8(\beta+1)$. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 19, 2024 at 0:49

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

I assume a typo as suggested in my comments, such that \begin{align} f(\alpha,\beta,\gamma) &=(2\alpha+8\beta+12\gamma-1) \, f(\alpha-1,\beta,\gamma) \\ {}&- 2(\alpha+1) \, f(\alpha+1,\beta-1,\gamma) \\ {}&- 8(\beta+1) \, f(\alpha,\beta+1,\gamma-1) \\ {}&- 12(\gamma+1) \, f(\alpha,\beta-2,\gamma+1). \end{align} In direction $\alpha$ the recursion can be summed. Noting that \begin{align} \frac{(\alpha+1)f(\alpha+1,\beta,\gamma)}{f(\alpha,\beta,\gamma)} \end{align} is a slow growing integer sequence for all $\alpha,\beta,\gamma\geq0$, Mathematica's FindSequenceFunction[] can be guided to find the closed form \begin{align}\label{eq:1}\tag{1} \frac{(\alpha+1)f(\alpha+1,\beta,\gamma)}{f(\alpha,\beta,\gamma)} =(1 + \alpha + 2\beta + 3\gamma) \, (1 + 2\alpha + 4\beta + 6\gamma) \, , \end{align} such that \begin{align}\label{eq:2a}\tag{2a} \frac{f(\alpha,\beta,\gamma)}{f(0,\beta,\gamma)} &= \prod_{\alpha'=0}^{\alpha-1} \frac{(1 + \alpha' + 2\beta + 3\gamma) \, (1 + 2\alpha' + 4\beta + 6\gamma)}{1+\alpha'} \\ \label{eq:2b}\tag{2b} &= \frac{\Gamma(1 + 2\alpha + 4\beta + 6\gamma)} {2^\alpha \, \Gamma(1+\alpha)\,\Gamma(1 + 4\beta + 6\gamma)}\\ \label{eq:2c}\tag{2c} &= \frac{(1 + 4\beta + 6\gamma)_{2\alpha}} {2^\alpha \, \alpha!}\,, \end{align} with Pochhammer symbol $(a)_n$.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ If one substitutes this in the original recurrence and denotes $g(b,c)=f(0,b,c)$, we get, I believe, $g(b,c)=-(4b+6c-2)(4b+6c-3)g(b-1,c)-8(b+1)g(b+1,c-1)-12(c+1)g(b-2,c+1)$ - perhaps Mathematica can do miracles for this recurrence once again? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 19, 2024 at 5:36
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, that's true, but MMA can not solve this recursion. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 19, 2024 at 5:39
  • $\begingroup$ Can you solve the original recursion in the direction of $\beta$ and $\gamma$ also? Perhaps knowing all of them would help somehow. Or is $\alpha$ somehow special? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 20, 2024 at 15:33
  • $\begingroup$ It does seem like $\alpha$ is more special among the others, I think. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 20, 2024 at 17:42

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.