2
$\begingroup$

Suppose $S$ is a surface and the Mapping Class Group, $Mod(S)$, of $S$, is the group of self-homeomorphisms of $S$, up to isotopy. This group acts on a graph called "curve graph", denote by $\mathcal{C}(S)$. The construction of this graph can be found in "A primer on mapping class groups" by Benson Farb and Dan Margalit.

I was studying the paper by Masur and Minsky: Geometry of the complex of curves I: Hyperbolicity, where they proved that curve graph is hyperbolic in the sense of Gromov. In the introduction of the paper they have written and I quote: "it is plain that $Mod(S)$ acts isometrically on $\mathcal{C}(S)$, with compact quotient."

I was finding difficulty to understand that why there will be compact quotient, and what is the fundamental domain.

Thanks in advance.

$\endgroup$
9
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This follows from the “change of coordinates principle” described in Farb-Margalit’s primer. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 9, 2024 at 11:04
  • $\begingroup$ the change of coordinate principle says that between two distinct, non-separating curves there is a homeomorphism sending one to other. does that mean there is only one orbit? $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 9, 2024 at 11:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That’s just one example of the change of coordinates principle. Go back and read that chapter of the primer. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 9, 2024 at 11:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ (a good test of your understanding of it is that the cocompactness of the action becomes obvious, though it is a bit annoying to write down a fundamental domain) $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 9, 2024 at 11:55
  • $\begingroup$ A meaningful question would be about cardinality of the simplex set of the curve complex modulo the mapping class group (or, better, the pants complex), generalizing the Catalan numbers. I do not know an answer to this one but it might be in the literature. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 9, 2024 at 15:58

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

As Andy says, that the action is co-compact follows from the "change of coordinates principle". Finding a fundamental domain for $S_2$ (the compact, connected, oriented, boundary-less surface of genus two) is a nice exercise. The problem of finding a fundamental domain for $S_g$ quickly succumbs to "combinatorial explosion".

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.