2
$\begingroup$

Let $F$ be a $p$-adic local field and $W$ be a 2n-dimensional symplectic space over $F$. Let $G_n$ be the isometry group of $W$ and $B_n$ be the Borel subgroup of $G_n$. Then the maximal torus $T_n$ of $B_n$ is isomorphic to $(GL_1)^n$. Let $\pi$ be an irreducible quotient of $Ind_{B_n(F)}^{G_n(F)} (\chi_1 \boxtimes \cdots \boxtimes \chi_n)$, the normalized induction of a character $\chi_1 \boxtimes \cdots \boxtimes \chi_n$ of $T_n$ to $G_n$.

Let $|\chi_i|=|\cdot|^{s_i}$ for some $s_i \in \mathbb{R}$. If $s_{i_0} \ge 1$ for some $i_0$ and other $s_i$' are in $-\frac{1}{2}<s_i<\frac{1}{2}$, it seems that author claims that $\pi$ is non-generic. But I don't know why it is. I just guess that there might be some general criterion for determining generality and it violates it.

I appreciate if you shed me a light on this!

Thank you very much in advance.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Not an expert in this and haven't thought for long, and maybe I am being stupid, but this sounds fishy. I thought that for generic $s_i$ ($(s_i)\in\mathbb{C}^n$ outside a union of affine hyperplanes), the parabolic induction is irreducible. Then, I am sure that the full parabolic induction has a Whittaker model. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 29, 2024 at 8:51
  • $\begingroup$ @Cheng-ChiangTsai, Thank you very much for the comment! It is important to note that there is an additional assumption regarding 𝜋, namely, that 𝜋 is a unitary representation. I speculate that unitarity imposes certain restrictions on the exponents, ensuring that they are not overly general. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 6, 2024 at 17:10

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.