2
$\begingroup$

$\DeclareMathOperator\SO{SO}\DeclareMathOperator\Gr{Gr}$I came across a problem that could be formulated in term of Grassmannians, I would be very glad to have your opinion about it.

I have an irreducible representation of $G = \SO(k)$, $k\ge 3$ on some complex vector space $V$ of dimension $n\ge 4$. Assume this is a real representation i.e. there is $U$ real of dimension $n$ invariant by $G$ with $U \oplus \sqrt{-1}U = V$.

I would like to show that the following thing is not possibile.

There is a two dimensional real subspace $\Sigma\subseteq U$ and an $n-2$ dimensional real subspace $\tau$ of $U$ such that if we consider the induced action of $G$ on the Grassmannian $\Gr(2,U)$, $\Sigma\subseteq\tau$ and the $G$ orbit of $\Sigma$ in the Grassmannian $\Gr(2,U)$ is contained in the Plücker hyperplane section of spaces intersection $\tau$ non trivially.

I think I proved this for $\SO(3)$ and $\SO(4)$.

Said differently, can I have two not trivial $G$ invariant orthogonal (with respect to the invariant inner product ) subspaces of $\bigwedge\nolimits^2 U$ such that the image in $P(\bigwedge\nolimits^2 U)$ of both subspaces intersect the Grassmannian?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Welcome to MO! Because your user ID automatically appears below your question, it is usual not to (redundantly) sign questions, so I have edited that out. $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 12, 2023 at 16:38

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.