1
$\begingroup$

Let $X$ be a smooth projective curve over the complex numbers, and take $\Delta$ the diagonal divisor on $X\times X$. Using the adjunction formula, one computes $\Delta\cdot\Delta =2-2g$ for $g$ the genus of $X$.

Can one concretely construct a divisor $D$ linearly equivalent to $\Delta$ and intersecting $\Delta$ properly, making the calculation of $\Delta\cdot D$ as explicit as possible and avoiding the adjunction formula (and avoiding using the normal bundle)?

Example. For $X=\mathbf{P}^1$, one can fix a point $x\in X$. Call $c_0 = x\times X$ and $c_2 = X\times x$, and $c_0 +c_2$ is linearly equivalent to $\Delta$ and intersects $\Delta$ in $(x,x)+(x,x)$, counted with multiplicity, and so $\Delta\cdot\Delta =2$. Is there a Cartier divisor $D$ such that $D$ is linearly equivalent to $\Delta$ and one can check that $D\cdot\Delta = 2$ "by hand"?

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Since the self-intersection is negative as soon as $g>1$, the diagonal is rigid and you can't find such a divisor. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 28, 2023 at 13:56
  • $\begingroup$ @MarcoGolla What about when $g=0$ or $g=1$? Even for $X=\mathbf{P}^1$, I'd be interested in constructing an explicit $D$ that is itself a prime divisor if possible. Thanks for commenting $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 28, 2023 at 14:18
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ For $X=\mathbb{P^1}$, $X\times X$ is a quadric in $\mathbb{P^3}$, so take $D= X\times X\cap H$ for $H$ a general hyperplane. For $g=1$, you can translate $\Delta$ using the group law on $X$. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 28, 2023 at 14:45
  • $\begingroup$ @DonuArapura To better understand and give another example, if $X$ is defined over the algebraic closure of a finite field, can one move $\Delta$ using geometric Frobenius (at the cost of dividing by $q$ eventually), say? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 28, 2023 at 15:34
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ @MarcoGolla the OP did not specify that the Cartier divisor should be effective. @ Tim, somehow the moving lemma says that this is always possible, but I'm not sure you'll find a clean recipe that works for all curves, even of a given genus... $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 28, 2023 at 15:41

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

Here is a reasonably geometric way to move $\Delta_X$ to some other (non-effective) divisor.

Strategy. For $\mathbf P^1$, we know how to do this (see below for an alternative method). In general, take a sufficiently nice finite map $f \colon X \to \mathbf P^1$, and consider $g = f \times f \colon X \times X \to \mathbf P^1 \times \mathbf P^1$. Then $\Delta_X$ is a component of $D = g^{-1}(\Delta_{\mathbf P^1})$, and we know how to move $D$. If $D' = D - \Delta_X$ is the 'residual divisor', it remains to compute $\Delta_X \cdot D$ and $\Delta_X \cdot D'$.

Spoiler: if $d = \deg f$ and $R$ is the ramification divisor [Hart77, §IV.2], then $\Delta_X \cdot D = 2d$ and $\Delta_X \cdot D' = \deg R$, so $$\Delta_X^2 = \Delta_X \cdot D - \Delta_X \cdot D' = 2d - \deg R,$$ which gives the result by Riemann–Hurwitz!

Example. For $\mathbf P^1$, there are many methods to do this; see for instance Donu Arapura's comment. Another method is as follows: any non-identity matrix $A \in \operatorname{PGL}_2(k)$ gives a graph $\Gamma_A \subseteq \mathbf P^1 \times \mathbf P^1$ that is linearly equivalent to $\Delta_{\mathbf P^1}$. The intersections of $\Delta_{\mathbf P^1}$ with $\Gamma_A$ are given by the eigenvectors of $A$, so there are $2$ when counted with multiplicity. If you want it even more explicitly, you can take $A$ to be diagonal, so the intersection points are $([0:1],[0:1])$ and $([1:0],[1:0])$.

Remark. In the general case, we pick a suitable finite morphism $f \colon X \to \mathbf P^1$. For instance, we probably want $f$ to be separable (which is always possible; see e.g. this post). And it might even be desirable to have $f$ be tamely ramified, which is possible if $\operatorname{char} k \neq 2$ or $k \subseteq \bar{\mathbf F}_2$, but not in general [KLW23]. In fact, for $\operatorname{char} k \neq 2$, a sufficiently general $f$ has ramification index $2$ at each ramification point in $x$.

Let $g = f\times f$ and $D = g^{-1}(\Delta_{\mathbf P^1})$ as before, and set $D' = D - \Delta_X$. Note that the support of $D'$ is the closure of the locus $\{(x,y) \in X^2\ |\ x \neq y \text{ and } f(x) = f(y)\}$.

The first claim is that $D$ is geometrically reduced. After immediate passage to $\bar k$, by [Tag 0344] we have to show that $D$ is (R0) and (S1). The second is automatic as $D$ is a divisor in a smooth variety [Tag 00SB]. To see that $D$ is generically smooth, take an open $U \subseteq X$ such that $f|_U$ is étale (which exists as $f$ is separable). Then $D \cap (U \times U) = U \times_{\mathbf P^1} U$ is smooth since it is étale over $\mathbf P^1$. Since $D$ contains no horizontal or vertical divisors, $D \cap (U \times U)$ is dense in $D$.

Next we compute $\Delta_X \cdot D$ by moving $D$ to the linearly equivalent divisor $E = g^{-1}(\Gamma_A)$. If $d = \deg f$, then the projection formula [Hart77, Appendix A, §1, A4] gives $$\Delta_X \cdot D = \Delta_X \cdot E = (g_* \Delta_X) \cdot \Gamma_A = (d \Delta_{\mathbf P^1}) \cdot \Gamma_A = 2d.$$ In this case, the projection formula for divisors can actually be deduced from that for coherent sheaves [Hart77, Exc. II.5.1(d)], using the formula $D_1 \cdot D_2 = \operatorname{length}(\mathcal O_{D_1} \otimes \mathcal O_{D_2})$ and the fact that pushforward along the degree $d$ locally free morphism $\Delta_X \to \Delta_{\mathbf P^1}$ multiplies length by $d$. Or dispose of the projection formula altogether by using $D_1 \cdot D_2 = \deg(\mathcal O_S(D_2)|_{D_1})$, which is well-suited to the case where $D_2$ is pulled back from somewhere.

To finish the computation, it remains to compute $\Delta_X \cdot D'$. Clearly the intersection points of $\Delta_X$ with $D'$ are exactly the ramification points of $f$. But in fact, $\Delta_X \cdot D' = \deg R$ is the degree of the ramification divisor, defined as in [Hart77, §IV.2]. For instance, if $f$ has ramification index $2$ everywhere and $\operatorname{char} k \neq 2$, this says that $D'$ meets $D$ transversely, which is easily checked in local coordinates.

For an actual proof (in general) of $\Delta_X \cdot D' = \deg R$, we use the short exact sequence $$0 \to \mathcal O_{X \times X}(-\Delta_X)\big|_{D'} \to \mathcal O_D \to \mathcal O_{\Delta_X} \to 0$$ obtained locally from $$0 \to \mathcal O_V/(g) \stackrel f\to \mathcal O_V/(fg) \to \mathcal O_V/(f) \to 0$$ on an open subset $V \subseteq X \times X$ on which $\Delta_X$ is cut out by $f$ and $D'$ by $g$ (exactness on the left uses that $X \times X$ is locally factorial). We conclude that the ideal $\mathscr I \subseteq \mathcal O_D$ cutting out $\Delta_X$ is isomorphic to $\mathcal O_{X \times X}(-\Delta_X)|_{D'}$, so $$\deg R = \operatorname{length}\left(\mathscr I/\mathscr I^2\right) = \operatorname{length}\left(\mathcal O_{X \times X}(-\Delta_X)\big|_{D' \cap \Delta_X}\right),$$ which equals $\Delta_X \cdot D' = \operatorname{length}(\mathcal O_{D' \cap \Delta_X})$ since line bundles on zero-dimensional schemes are trivial. $\square$


References.

[Hart77] R. Hartshorne, Algebraic geometry. Graduate Texts in Mathematics 52. Springer-Verlag, 1977. ZBL0367.14001.

[KLW23] K. S. Kedlaya, D. Litt, J. Witaszek, Tamely ramified morphisms of curves and Belyi’s theorem in positive characteristic. Int. Math. Res. Not. 2023.4 (2023), p. 2803-2833. ZBL1509.14048.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.