2
$\begingroup$

This is not a homework or a project question, just me trying to get acquainted to the subject: I am an MSc student who recently came across the Wiles defect numerical criterion (see, for example, Wiles defect of Hecke algebras via local-global arguments and Wiles defect for modules and criteria for freeness). As frequently mentioned, this is closely related to a technique Wiles developed in his proof of FLT, called patching. Following the abstract of the latter paper, the situation is this: We have a deformation ring $R$ associated to a modular representation $ \bar{\rho}:G_\mathbb{Q} \rightarrow GL_2(k)$ of the absolute Galois group $G_\mathbb{Q}$, which arises from a complete, Noetherian, local Hecke algebra $\mathbb{T}$ acting on $H^1 (X_0(N), \mathcal{O})_{\mathfrak{m}}$, the cohomology of a modular curve $X_0(N)$, with coeffs in a DVR $\mathcal{O}$ finite flat over $\mathbb{Z}_p$, localized at the maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}$, and with $\mathbb{T}/\mathfrak{m} = k$ a finite field. There is an action of the abs. Galois group on the cohomology, and it turns out $\bar{\rho}$ is isomorphic to a representation associated to the maximal ideal, which produces a surjection $R \rightarrow \mathbb{T}$, and the numerical criterion implies in favorable conditions that the cohomology is free as an $R$-module, and that the latter surjection is in fact a bijection of complete intersections.

The numerical invariant itself (as presented in the second paper) is defined as $\delta_A(M) = \operatorname{rank}(M[\mathfrak{p}_A])\operatorname{length}(\Phi_A)-\operatorname{length}(\Psi_A(M))$(as $\mathcal{O}$-modules), where $\mathfrak{p}_A=\operatorname{ker}(\lambda_A:A \rightarrow \mathcal{O}$,a surjection from a Noetherian local ring to a DVR), $M$ a finite $A$-module, $M[\mathfrak{p}_A]$ the $\mathfrak{p}_A$-torsion submodule of $M$, $\Phi_A = \mathfrak{p}_A/\mathfrak{p}^2_A$ and $\Psi_A(M)=\frac{M}{M[\mathfrak{p}_A]+M[A[\mathfrak{p}_A]]}$.

I've had good introductions to most areas needed to try and make sense of this, except modular representations, but I would be grateful if someone could clarify the following facts (Edited to reduce number of questions):

How do the Hecke algebra (generated by Hecke operators and diamond operators) and the Galois group act on the cohomology, and how does the surjection $R \rightarrow \mathbb{T}$ arise in this context, and why is it so important that this is actually a bijection?

I genuinely apologize for the long post, and please do not feel obliged to write long answers. If the post is irrelevant, please delete it.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ In general, it's better to ask just a single question in a post (e.g., see meta.mathoverflow.net/q/2666/6518 though it's not a rule). In your case, I'd recommend boiling your post down to one or maybe 2 closely related questions, and then based on responses you can ask separate questions on other parts later. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 10, 2023 at 0:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ ... and I would suggest that you look at text discussing Taylor-Wiles, where you should find some answers to the above (and many more interesting things. Like "Modular Forms and Fermat’s Last Theorem". Editors: Gary Cornell, Joseph H. Silverman, Glenn Stevens. Springer 97. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 10, 2023 at 9:13
  • $\begingroup$ @Kimball Thank you, edited accordingly $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 10, 2023 at 15:48
  • $\begingroup$ @ChrisWuthrich Thank you so much for the reference, I have just started reading it and it seems really helpful $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 10, 2023 at 15:49

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.