Automatically Remove AI Features From Windows 11

It seems like a fair assessment to state that the many ‘AI’ features that Microsoft added to Windows 11 are at least somewhat controversial. Unsurprisingly, this has led many to wonder about disabling or outright removing these features, with [zoicware]’s ‘Remove Windows AI’ project on GitHub trying to automate this process as much as reasonably possible.

All you need to use it is your Windows 11-afflicted system running at least 25H2 and the PowerShell script. The script is naturally run with Administrator privileges as it has to do some manipulating of the Windows Registry and prevent Windows Update from undoing many of the changes. There is also a GUI for those who prefer to just flick a few switches in a UI instead of running console commands.

Among the things that can be disabled automatically are the disabling of Copilot, Recall, AI Actions, and other integrations in applications like Edge, Paint, etc. The reinstallation of removed packages is inhibited by a custom package. For the ‘features’ that cannot be disabled automatically, there is a list of where to toggle those to ‘off’.

Naturally, since Windows 11 is a moving target, it can be rough to keep a script like this up to date, but it seems to be a good start at least for anyone who finds themselves stuck on Windows 11 with no love for Microsoft’s ‘AI’ adventures. For the other features, there are also Winaero Tweaker and Open-Shell, with the latter in particular bringing back the much more usable Windows 2000-style start menu, free of ads and other nonsense.

31 thoughts on “Automatically Remove AI Features From Windows 11

    1. When Microsoft wants to hard-push extremely unpopular features (which is nearly all of them) they like to tie it into the functionality of every single part of the OS so it’s impossible to disable without gimping the whole system. And then if you somehow manage to finesse it, there’s about 43 sneaky hidden processes which will silently undo your work when you aren’t looking. They practically invented “asshole marketing.”

  1. Another excellent bloatware removal: https://archlinux.org/

    Call me troll if you want, the way IT is going requires radical changes. Linux isn’t exactly radical, but MS and Apple took a path that only braindead can follow.
    We all have an excuse to run windows somewhere, and it’s usually a bad excuse (that has with productivity to do).
    Thus this kind of tools, an attempt at staying afloat while all technically nonsense drag you at the bottom.

    1. Recommending Arch to a Windows user is like recommending a .44 Magnum revolver as a starter gun to a 70 year old woman. Yes some may handle it, but most wont and you scare them away for the rest of their lifes.

      1. LOL, let me guess : “This is America !?!”
        Why would you give a gun to a 70 years old lady in the first place ? I guess pour carefully picked metaphore proves my point: windows is all about weponizing. AI is a weapon against the oriental threat (or whatever else like the recession), tracking is a weapon against ist own users – serves only the monopoly, closed source kernel is a weapon against hackers,…

        Computer is also a way to access the information, like a book but with additional features,…and a lot of bullshit today.

        Linux ist still not ideal, but that’s the best option one can get in 2025. I migrate entire administrations, companies, my family and friends to it since 10 years. So far, all I have to complain about is compatibility of edgy software. But users: the learn to love it, fast.

        As a general feedback: it doesn’t run on Linux? Then it’s probably not worth it. Wanna run Pro Engineer, a strange CNC driver, Fusion 360, do it offline!

        1. LOL, let me guess; you’re European?
          We have ladies here in their 70’s and even 80’s that own and actively use firearms. No normal person here in the US wets their panties over it. Why do you?

      2. Good. High bar of entry for computing, it’s a miracle in the hands of the few adept and a dehumanizing nightmarish monstrosity when it is democratized. People unfortunately have a cognitive bias that prevents them from ever noticing this very obvious phenomenon.

    2. The issue with Linux and other libre UNIX-like OS is they’re so extremist. You can either:

      - make them “computing for the illiterate” experience and it results in something Android-like where nothing can go wrong really, but at the same time it’s so dumbed down, even a toddler can do stuff.

      - turn them into PURE PRODUCTIVITY machines, free of any bullshit pushed on by Microsoft or Apple – but if it breaks, you’ll be really glad you read those textbooks by Tanenbaum and Nemeth.

      Unlike Windows, there’s simply no middle-ground for people who are not idiots, but are not computer scientists / software developers / hackers either. For example, on Windows my dad can understand how to pirate and then install drivers and software for that CAN adapter for his used car, so that he can program in a new keyfob. If something doesn’t work, it’s very likely he’ll be able to communicate the issue and get support on a forum (they’re not dead yet). Tell him to screw around with lsusb, dmesg, fstab or some other systemd bullshit and all I can say is “gl & hf”.

      Microsoft can be evil, but they certainly understood how to make computers accessible for average lusers while also keeping them open enough for geeks who know things but have not yet become full-on artistic nerds.

      Also, doing something as trivial as unplugging a plug-and-play USB device usually doesn’t cause NT kernel to crash and burn like it did with Linux kernel for about a year before it was properly fixed in 2023 (not 2003 but 2023) https://www.phoronix.com/news/Logitech-USB-Unplug-Linux-Crash

      1. From your source and the bug reports linked, it looks to me like the bugs related to the disconnects were fixed in 6-12 weeks from when they were reported, and not about a year. Seems like a pretty good turnaround to me for a free operating system.

      2. Yes they ‘understood’ as in past tense, they decided to go a new route, a route many of us can not follow anymore.
        And doing so sort of takes away the choice for many people, where before you had a group who said ‘linux is nice, but I like certain windows software and I’m used to windows’ you now are in a new situation where for many windows just isn’t tenable anymore.

        And now MS says the whole concept of the OS for users is going away and it will become a box of AI agents and you just tell it what you want and it does it for you… which is NOT what a great many of us want at all. Nor is there evidence it’s even feasible from observing AI agents so far.

        Perhaps it’s good though, it makes the choice even easier.

        1. they are only embedding this into the os so that normal people can fund their ai r&d while they desperately try to make ai turn a profit rather than just be a financial shell game.

      3. It’s always been like this. Imagine the difference in experience between technicians and lay folk as owning a car became less optional across much of the ‘first world’ in the 1960s. Of course, that doesn’t mean it’s ‘no big deal’, in fact we can see the disaster in parallel, as non-technicians spend more money on their cars for a less safe and reliable service, and car ownership becomes inextricably linked to the poverty that defines the bottom edge of the middle class.

      4. Have you ever seen those dementia simulator videos where the camera pans around and the whole layout of the grocery store is different? That’s what I imagine my parents’ experience is using Windows 11. Neither of them really know how to use computers, but can remember a sequence of actions needed to do what they want. So any time Microsoft sneakily changes something, I get to hear about it, as the family computer person. It is a frustrating experience.

        There are now two Control Panels, two right click menus, and items like “copy” and “paste” replaced with strange hieroglyphs. Nothing my parents even do on the computer is any different than the things they were doing 20 years ago, but for some reason somebody thinks they have to relearn those skills every couple years.

        1. windows has been renaming and moving things since i started using windows (95 was my entry point). moving the goal posts is how they can justify all their certification programs. after windows 7 i guess is where all the old guard had retired and been replaced with a bunch of young whipper snappers raised with smart phones in their pocket. rather than understanding all the nuances of the windows ui, instead they try to reinvent the wheel in their own image.

          i hate seeing phone iconography on my computers. i wouldn’t so much mind the new phone style control panel if they had bothered to make it as useful as the real control panel. you dont need simple interfaces when you have a keyboard and mouse, and plenty of screen space. phones simplify and hide functionality because of a lack of these things. it makes sense on a phone. on a computer is just a waste of decades of institutionalized muscle memory. let phones be phones and computers be computers.

      5. I think the extremist OS is the one which resembles an evil little sleepless gremlin that lives in the corner of your room and constantly attempts to sabotage and subvert your intentions every single moment you’re not actively watching it, gaslighting you and re-arranging the furniture while you’re away. And desperately trying to force Edge browser and Bing on you.

  2. I’ve made several friends really happy by revitalizing their old laptops for their children to do homework. Windows had become sluggish and unusable. Swapped the hard disk with a 10€ SSD and installed an older version of Linux Mint. They immediately were comfortable and familiar with the desktop and the apps. The laptops responded quickly and were given a new life which otherwise, like most people, would have trashed it and bought another Windows laptop.

  3. I would pay good money for a Windows that is simply an OS and just does that well. something that works with drivers, it lets the programs and games run and lets me modify its behavior as i need them.

    Instead of this bloated billboard filled with non-optional adware of which most of it doesn’t actually serve any purpose beyond making a line on some random chart to go up as part of some self-fulfilling prophecy to sell to shareholders.

  4. Peter Girnus 🦅
    @gothburz
    Last quarter I rolled out Microsoft Copilot to 4,000 employees.

    $30 per seat per month.

    $1.4 million annually.

    I called it “digital transformation.”

    The board loved that phrase.

    They approved it in eleven minutes.

    No one asked what it would actually do.

    Including me.

    I told everyone it would “10x productivity.”

    That’s not a real number.

    But it sounds like one.

    HR asked how we’d measure the 10x.

    I said we’d “leverage analytics dashboards.”

    They stopped asking.

    Three months later I checked the usage reports.

    47 people had opened it.

    12 had used it more than once.

    One of them was me.

    I used it to summarize an email I could have read in 30 seconds.

    It took 45 seconds.

    Plus the time it took to fix the hallucinations.

    But I called it a “pilot success.”

    Success means the pilot didn’t visibly fail.

    The CFO asked about ROI.

    I showed him a graph.

    The graph went up and to the right.

    It measured “AI enablement.”

    I made that metric up.

    He nodded approvingly.

    We’re “AI-enabled” now.

    I don’t know what that means.

    But it’s in our investor deck.

    A senior developer asked why we didn’t use Claude or ChatGPT.

    I said we needed “enterprise-grade security.”

    He asked what that meant.

    I said “compliance.”

    He asked which compliance.

    I said “all of them.”

    He looked skeptical.

    I scheduled him for a “career development conversation.”

    He stopped asking questions.

    Microsoft sent a case study team.

    They wanted to feature us as a success story.

    I told them we “saved 40,000 hours.”

    I calculated that number by multiplying employees by a number I made up.

    They didn’t verify it.

    They never do.

    Now we’re on Microsoft’s website.

    “Global enterprise achieves 40,000 hours of productivity gains with Copilot.”

    The CEO shared it on LinkedIn.

    He got 3,000 likes.

    He’s never used Copilot.

    None of the executives have.

    We have an exemption.

    “Strategic focus requires minimal digital distraction.”

    I wrote that policy.

    The licenses renew next month.

    I’m requesting an expansion.

    5,000 more seats.

    We haven’t used the first 4,000.

    But this time we’ll “drive adoption.”

    Adoption means mandatory training.

    Training means a 45-minute webinar no one watches.

    But completion will be tracked.

    Completion is a metric.

    Metrics go in dashboards.

    Dashboards go in board presentations.

    Board presentations get me promoted.

    I’ll be SVP by Q3.

    I still don’t know what Copilot does.

    But I know what it’s for.

    It’s for showing we’re “investing in AI.”

    Investment means spending.

    Spending means commitment.

    Commitment means we’re serious about the future.

    The future is whatever I say it is.

    As long as the graph goes up and to the right.

    Original twit: https://x.com/gothburz/status/1999124665801880032

    1. I have copilot by default enabled on all M$ products we use. Insofar it is hit and miss, often times I have to disable it so that it would stop screwing up what I am typing (code). It has its own whimsical ideas what I mean when I type, so it is of rather limited use. I do appreciate auto-lookup for the rarely used commands, but beyond that it is a bother.

      I am pretty sure all of my so-called “managers” use it to auto-write emails, I can spot standard phrases, but beyond that I am not even sure managers are needed to start with – if copilot can write emails, than what is the role of the managers?

      I am also pretty sure AI will figure this out and re-route critical tasks around managers’ emails. Because that’s how critical tasks usually work, without useless people bothering actual workers doing actual work that needs to be done.

      Job security-shmecurity, AI has different ideas. For this part alone I am glad it is around.

  5. I removed windows from my PC some 15 years ago.
    And there are some annoyances. For example when I want to buy an industrial (1.5kW or so) servo motor with motor drive, it nearly impossible to find Linux software to adjust the control loops.

    But apart from such specialized things. Linux Mint works pretty smoothly for the last 8+ years while windoze may creep back in it’s own hole and rot over there.

  6. Now all we need is an AI that recognizes when an AI feature is added to Windows. It would: recognize the new feature. Make a plan to remove the feature. Organize the drone strikes. Run the script to remove the new feature.

    1. This might be satirical, but I honestly believe there is a real future in antagonistic counter-AI. It probably will be a huge business someday soon. Enormous amounts of global compute are going to be dedicated to ruthless AI agents which exist simply to thwart and slow down and frustrate other malicious AI agents, the latter trying to scam and attack the owners of the former at such rates and volume that there’s no way even a group of very good human agents could fight it.

    1. There used to be a good package of scripts for de-shittifying Windows 10. It was simply called “DESTROY WINDOWS 10.” I appreciated that name. It’s way way out of date now unfortunately.

Leave a Reply

Please be kind and respectful to help make the comments section excellent. (Comment Policy)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.