You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Credit where credit is due, so +1 on the "creator" acknowledgement.
Didn't Pierre open up the possibility of adding others as admins on the sourceforge page? The URL looks more like a project page than a personal page, as stonebig's links are. We could then still use it for the downloads, per this sourceforge suggestion.
Yes, the current release has a few drawbacks (missing dependancies), that the next one should not have.
There will remains the point about Pycharm in (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/winpython/HJq88_JPWOI) that I won't try to understand on my pc, but may hide a problem (in Pycharm or in Winpython, I don't know)
Activity
jimpassmore commentedon Sep 23, 2014
Credit where credit is due, so +1 on the "creator" acknowledgement.
Didn't Pierre open up the possibility of adding others as admins on the sourceforge page? The URL looks more like a project page than a personal page, as stonebig's links are. We could then still use it for the downloads, per this sourceforge suggestion.
stonebig commentedon Sep 23, 2014
Jim, I don't guess how you find all those great plans.
I think we were not in good shape enough to take the offer of Pierre when he did it.
maybe after next release.
jimpassmore commentedon Sep 24, 2014
After next release sounds like a good plan. That way, we should have GitHub "stable" and can do one thing at a time.
stonebig commentedon Sep 24, 2014
Yes, the current release has a few drawbacks (missing dependancies), that the next one should not have.
There will remains the point about Pycharm in (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/winpython/HJq88_JPWOI) that I won't try to understand on my pc, but may hide a problem (in Pycharm or in Winpython, I don't know)