-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 652
fix(add): add handling of merge option #797
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Hi @ematipico, I am pushing a sample refactoring EDIT: Fixed lint errors @ematipico |
|
Thank you for your pull request! The most important CI builds succeeded, we’ll review the pull request soon. |
|
@ematipico Have a review when free 😅. |
|
CLA bot is showing that I have not signed 🤔. Some issue here @ematipico |
|
@rishabh3112 It shows signed for me. All checks success. |
evenstensberg
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
|
Have applied suggestions @evenstensberg and left some comments for you :) |
evenstensberg
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These are the final changes requested before this is good to go, nice job!
evenstensberg
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Native modules first, those are those that are already shipped with node like fs, path etc, then the ones like autoprompt, followed up by @scoped/aye
|
Have moved local imports (example |
evenstensberg
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
last comments
evenstensberg
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm, thanks for your hard work in this 🥇
|
No problem, Thanks🎉🎉 |

BugFix #795
Closed #795
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
bugfix
Did you add tests for your changes?
N/A
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
N/A
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information