Skip to content

Conversation

@mgoin
Copy link
Member

@mgoin mgoin commented Aug 29, 2025

Purpose

It seems the Blackwell Test is failing on main since #23929, so skipping if the symbol isn't found for now

Log: https://buildkite.com/vllm/ci/builds/28870/steps/canvas?sid=0198f6b1-3529-46d8-9896-06aac42648d6

FAILED tests/kernels/quantization/test_silu_nvfp4_quant_fusion.py::test_quantize_to_fp4[cuda:0-42-shape0-dtype0] - AttributeError: '_OpNamespace' '_C' object has no attribute 'silu_and_mul_nvfp4_quant'

Test Plan

Test Result


Essential Elements of an Effective PR Description Checklist
  • The purpose of the PR, such as "Fix some issue (link existing issues this PR will resolve)".
  • The test plan, such as providing test command.
  • The test results, such as pasting the results comparison before and after, or e2e results
  • (Optional) The necessary documentation update, such as updating supported_models.md and examples for a new model.
  • (Optional) Release notes update. If your change is user facing, please update the release notes draft in the Google Doc.

Signed-off-by: mgoin <mgoin64@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a pragmatic fix for a CI failure in the nvfp4 SILU test. By checking for the existence of the silu_and_mul_nvfp4_quant operator before running the test, it ensures that the test suite doesn't fail in environments where this custom operator isn't compiled. My review includes a suggestion to update the test skip reason to accurately reflect this new condition, which will improve maintainability.

@mgoin mgoin added the ci-failure Issue about an unexpected test failure in CI label Aug 29, 2025
@DarkLight1337
Copy link
Member

DarkLight1337 commented Aug 30, 2025

@mgoin mgoin added the ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed label Aug 30, 2025
@njhill
Copy link
Member

njhill commented Sep 2, 2025

It appears this wasn't fixed by #23973 and it's still impacting CI. So we should probably merge this?

Copy link
Member

@yewentao256 yewentao256 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should land this first, still PR failing like #23289

@yewentao256 yewentao256 merged commit e66ed3e into vllm-project:main Sep 2, 2025
17 checks passed
@njhill njhill deleted the patch-mxfp4-silu branch September 2, 2025 17:31
elvischenv added a commit to elvischenv/vllm that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2025
This reverts commit e66ed3e.

Signed-off-by: elvischenv <219235043+elvischenv@users.noreply.github.com>
eicherseiji pushed a commit to eicherseiji/vllm that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2025
Signed-off-by: mgoin <mgoin64@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Wentao Ye <44945378+yewentao256@users.noreply.github.com>
FeiDaLI pushed a commit to FeiDaLI/vllm that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2025
Signed-off-by: mgoin <mgoin64@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Wentao Ye <44945378+yewentao256@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci-failure Issue about an unexpected test failure in CI ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants